Friday, June 09, 2023

Ozone High Pollution Advisory issued for Friday, June 09

Phoenix, AZ Air Quality Index 

Friday Forecast:

Alert: Ozone High Pollution Advisory in effect for Friday. Health Impacts >


An Ozone High Pollution Advisory has been issued for tomorrow in Phoenix. This HPA is not related to the Mulch Fire in Mesa.

We are in a short transitional period between two disturbances making their way through the southwestern U.S. Expect lighter winds and slightly higher temperatures over the next three days. Forecasted cloud cover will help to limit ozone growth today and on Saturday. Tomorrow however, timing of incoming cloud cover is just outside of the afternoon period where we see the most ozone growth throughout the day.

By Sunday, another system will move through the area, bringing with it stronger southwesterly winds, slightly lower temperatures, and occasional cloud cover. These indices will help to keep ozone out of the USG AQI category, and is expected to remain within the Moderate AQI.

PM10 (dust) will be mainly locally driven over the next few days, with the normal morning signatures we see at our most active sites. Levels will remain in the Moderate AQI until the weekend, dropping into the Good AQI as local activity diminishes...
- B. Droppleman
ADEQ Meteorologist







[Note: Data unavailable from source ~0000-0600 MST.]





Realtime Air Quality Data
Realtime Location: N/A
Issue Date: N/A


Current Air Quality Index

No DataData Not
Available


Action Day Alert:
There are currently no High Pollution Advisory alerts for Phoenix, AZ

Realtime AQI - Pollutant Details
Type: N/A
Index: N/A
AQI Value: N/A
No Data

Last Update: 
N/A


0-50Good
51-100Moderate
101-150Unhealthy for Sensitive Groups
151-200Unhealthy
201-300Very Unhealthy
301-500Hazardous


Air Quality Forecast
Forecast Location: Phoenix, AZ
Forecast Agency: Arizona Department of Environmental Quality
Two Day Forecast
Day One ForecastDay Two Forecast
Date: 06/09/2023
Type: Ozone
Index: Moderate
AQI Value: 87

Moderate
Date: 06/10/2023
Type: Ozone
Index: Unhealthy for Sensitive Groups
AQI Value: 101

Unhealthy for Sensitive Groups
Last Update: Thu, 08 Jun 2023 11:45:10 MST


Computation of the AQI requires an air pollutant concentration over a specified averaging period, obtained from an air monitor or model. Taken together, concentration and time represent the dose of the air pollutant. Health effects corresponding to a given dose are established by epidemiological research.[4] Air pollutants vary in potency, and the function used to convert from air pollutant concentration to AQI varies by pollutant. Its air quality index values are typically grouped into ranges. Each range is assigned a descriptor, a color code, and a standardized public health advisory.

The AQI can increase due to an increase of air emissions. For example, during rush hour traffic or when there is an upwind forest fire or from a lack of dilution of air pollutants. Stagnant air, often caused by an anticyclonetemperature inversion, or low wind speeds lets air pollution remain in a local area, leading to high concentrations of pollutants, chemical reactions between air contaminants and hazy conditions.[5] 

United States[edit]

United States Air Quality Index
AQILevel of health concernColor
0 to 50GoodGreen
51 to 100ModerateYellow
101 to 150Unhealthy for sensitive groupsOrange
151–200UnhealthyRed
201–300Very unhealthyPurple
301–500HazardousMaroon
PM2.5 24-Hour AQI Loop, Courtesy US EPA

The United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has developed an Air Quality Index that is used to report air quality. This AQI is divided into six categories indicating increasing levels of health concern. An AQI value over 300 represents hazardous air quality and below 50 the air quality is good.[10]

The AQI is based on the five "criteria" pollutants regulated under the Clean Air Act: ground-level ozone, particulate matter, carbon monoxide, sulfur dioxide, and nitrogen dioxide. The EPA has established National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for each of these pollutants in order to protect public health. An AQI value of 100 generally corresponds to the level of the NAAQS for the pollutant.[10] The Clean Air Act (USA) (1990) requires the EPA to review its National Ambient Air Quality Standards every five years to reflect evolving health effects information. The Air Quality Index is adjusted periodically to reflect these changes.

Computing the AQI[edit]

The air quality index is a piecewise linear function of the pollutant concentration. At the boundary between AQI categories, there is a discontinuous jump of one AQI unit. To convert from concentration to AQI this equation is used:[41]

(If multiple pollutants are measured, the calculated AQI is the highest value calculated from the above equation applied for each pollutant.)

where:

 = the (Air Quality) index,
 = the pollutant concentration,
= the concentration breakpoint that is ≤ ,
= the concentration breakpoint that is ≥ ,
= the index breakpoint corresponding to ,
= the index breakpoint corresponding to .

The EPA's table of breakpoints is:[42][43][44]

O3 (ppb)O3 (ppb)PM2.5 (μg/m3)PM10 (μg/m3)CO (ppm)SO2 (ppb)NO2 (ppb)AQIAQI
Clow – Chigh (avg)Ilow – IhighCategory
0–54
(8-hr)
0.0–12.0
(24-hr)
0–54
(24-hr)
0.0–4.4
(8-hr)
0–35
(1-hr)
0–53
(1-hr)
0–50Good
55–70
(8-hr)
12.1–35.4
(24-hr)
55–154
(24-hr)
4.5–9.4
(8-hr)
36–75
(1-hr)
54–100
(1-hr)
51–100Moderate
71–85
(8-hr)
125–164
(1-hr)
35.5–55.4
(24-hr)
155–254
(24-hr)
9.5–12.4
(8-hr)
76–185
(1-hr)
101–360
(1-hr)
101–150Unhealthy for sensitive groups
86–105
(8-hr)
165–204
(1-hr)
55.5–150.4
(24-hr)
255–354
(24-hr)
12.5–15.4
(8-hr)
186–304
(1-hr)
361–649
(1-hr)
151–200Unhealthy
106–200
(8-hr)
205–404
(1-hr)
150.5–250.4
(24-hr)
355–424
(24-hr)
15.5–30.4
(8-hr)
305–604
(24-hr)
650–1249
(1-hr)
201–300Very unhealthy
405–504
(1-hr)
250.5–350.4
(24-hr)
425–504
(24-hr)
30.5–40.4
(8-hr)
605–804
(24-hr)
1250–1649
(1-hr)
301–400Hazardous
505–604
(1-hr)
350.5–500.4
(24-hr)
505–604
(24-hr)
40.5–50.4
(8-hr)
805–1004
(24-hr)
1650–2049
(1-hr)
401–500

Suppose a monitor records a 24-hour average fine particle (PM2.5) concentration of 26.4 micrograms per cubic meter. The equation above results in an AQI of:

which rounds to index value of 81, corresponding to air quality in the "Moderate" range.[45] To convert an air pollutant concentration to an AQI, EPA has developed a calculator.[46]

If multiple pollutants are measured at a monitoring site, then the largest or "dominant" AQI value is reported for the location. The ozone AQI between 100 and 300 is computed by selecting the larger of the AQI calculated with a 1-hour ozone value and the AQI computed with the 8-hour ozone value.

Eight-hour ozone averages do not define AQI values greater than 300; AQI values of 301 or greater are calculated with 1-hour ozone concentrations. 1-hour SO2 values do not define higher AQI values greater than 200. AQI values of 201 or greater are calculated with 24-hour SO2 concentrations.

Real-time monitoring data from continuous monitors are typically available as 1-hour averages. However, computation of the AQI for some pollutants requires averaging over multiple hours of data. (For example, calculation of the ozone AQI requires computation of an 8-hour average and computation of the PM2.5 or PM10 AQI requires a 24-hour average.) To accurately reflect the current air quality, the multi-hour average used for the AQI computation should be centered on the current time, but as concentrations of future hours are unknown and are difficult to estimate accurately, EPA uses surrogate concentrations to estimate these multi-hour averages. For reporting the PM2.5, PM10 and ozone air quality indices, this surrogate concentration is called the NowCast. The Nowcast is a particular type of weighted average that provides more weight to the most recent air quality data when air pollution levels are changing.[47][48] There is a free email subscription service for New York inhabitants – AirNYC.[49] Subscribers get notifications about the changes in the AQI values for the selected location (e.g. home address), based on air quality conditions.

Public availability of the AQI

A global air quality map

Real time monitoring data and forecasts of air quality that are color-coded in terms of the air quality index are available from EPA's AirNow web site.[50] 

Other organizations provide monitoring for members of sensitive groups such as asthmatics, children and adults over the age of 65.[51] 

  • Historical air monitoring data including AQI charts and maps are available at EPA's AirData website.[52] 
  • Detailed map about current AQI level and its two-day forecast is available from Aerostate web site.[53]

History of the AQI[edit]

The AQI made its debut in 1968, when the National Air Pollution Control Administration undertook an initiative to develop an air quality index and to apply the methodology to Metropolitan Statistical Areas. The impetus was to draw public attention to the issue of air pollution and indirectly push responsible local public officials to take action to control sources of pollution and enhance air quality within their jurisdictions.

Jack Fensterstock, the head of the National Inventory of Air Pollution Emissions and Control Branch, was tasked to lead the development of the methodology and to compile the air quality and emissions data necessary to test and calibrate resultant indices.[54]

The initial iteration of the air quality index used standardized ambient pollutant concentrations to yield individual pollutant indices. These indices were then weighted and summed to form a single total air quality index. The overall methodology could use concentrations that are taken from ambient monitoring data or are predicted by means of a diffusion model. The concentrations were then converted into a standard statistical distribution with a preset mean and standard deviation. The resultant individual pollutant indices are assumed to be equally weighted, although values other than unity can be used. Likewise, the index can incorporate any number of pollutants although it was only used to combine SOx, CO, and TSP because of a lack of available data for other pollutants.

While the methodology was designed to be robust, the practical application for all metropolitan areas proved to be inconsistent due to the paucity of ambient air quality monitoring data, lack of agreement on weighting factors, and non-uniformity of air quality standards across geographical and political boundaries. Despite these issues, the publication of lists ranking metropolitan areas achieved the public policy objectives and led to the future development of improved indices and their routine application.

 
AQ logo
 
Orange underline web

The Arizona Department of Environmental Quality has issued an Ozone High Pollution Advisory for Friday, June 09.

> "High Pollution Advisory" or "HPA" means the highest concentration of pollution may exceed the federal health standard. 

Active children, adults and people with lung disease such as asthma should reduce prolonged or heavy outdoor exertion.

Thursday, June 08, 2023

Washington-Based Think Tank Institute for Study of War: “The Ukrainian #counteroffensive has begun. Activity throughout #Ukraine is consistent with a variety of indicators that Ukrainian counteroffensive operations are underway across the theater,”

 ISW said that it had “observed a general uptick in military activity across the entire front line, not all of it part of the Ukrainian counter-offensive effort 
  • Ukrainian officials continue to deny or decline confirmation that their long-awaited campaign to retake territory occupied by Russian forces is under way.

Ukraine counteroffensive against Russia under way: 

think tank

Washington, DC-based Institute for the Study of War says Ukraine counteroffensive unlikely to unfold as ‘single grand operation’.

Ukrainian servicemen of the 3rd Assault Brigade move at their position on the front line in Bakhmut direction, Donetsk region, Ukraine, in this screengrab obtained from a social media video released on June 6, 2023. 3rd Assault Brigade/Ukrainian Armed Forces Press Service via REUTERS ATTENTION EDITORS - THIS IMAGE HAS BEEN SUPPLIED BY A THIRD PARTY. MANDATORY CREDIT. NO RESALES. NO ARCHIVES. REUTERS WAS NOT ABLE TO INDEPENDENTLY VERIFY THE LOCATION OF THE VIDEOS OR WHEN THE VIDEOS WERE FILMED.

Ukrainian servicemen of the 3rd Assault Brigade on the front line the Bakhmut area, Donetsk region, Ukraine, in this video screengrab released on June 6, 2023 [3rd Assault Brigade/Ukrainian Armed Forces Press Service via Reuters]

"Kyiv’s counteroffensive against Russian forces has started, a Washington, DC-based think tank monitoring the war in Ukraine has said, though Ukrainian officials continue to deny or decline confirmation that their long-awaited campaign to retake territory occupied by Russian forces is under way.

“The Ukrainian #counteroffensive has begun. Activity throughout #Ukraine is consistent with a variety of indicators that Ukrainian counteroffensive operations are underway across the theater,” the Institute for the Study of War (ISW) said in a series of tweets late on Thursday.

Ukrainian officials have confirmed that their forces are on the offensive in the Bakhmut region – where they have reportedly gained territory – and the ISW said that it had “observed a general uptick in military activity across the entire front line, not all of it part of the Ukrainian counter-offensive effort”.

  • The ISW said the counteroffensive “won’t likely unfold as a single grand operation”.

“It will likely consist of many undertakings at numerous locations of varying size and intensity over many weeks.”

With Ukrainian officials signaling that the start of the counteroffensive will not be officially announced, other experts have also concluded that the campaign has begun amid reports of fighting intensifying in areas along the more-than-1,000-kilometer (620-mile) front line from Kherson on the Black Sea to Ukraine’s border with Russia.

NBC News, citing a senior officer and a soldier near the front lines, also said the offensive had started, while The Washington Post, citing “four individuals” in the armed forces, reported the same information on Thursday.

Asked about those reports, a spokesperson for the General Staff of the Armed Forces of Ukraine told the Reuters news agency: “We have no such information.”

In his nightly address on Thursday, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy hailed what he described as “results” in heavy fighting in the Donetsk region in eastern Ukraine.

“I am in constant communication with our military. The commanders of Khortytsia, Tavria, [and] all those involved in the hottest areas. Donetsk region – very tough battles,” he said.

“But there is a result, and I am grateful to everyone who ensures this result! Bakhmut – well done. Step by step. I thank each of our warriors!”

Zelenskyy referenced other battlefield areas but said that now was not the time to discuss them.

“The entire east, the situation in the south, the situation after the Russians blew up the dam of the native Kakhovka – we see every detail. But it’s not time to talk about it today.”

In a podcast on Wednesday, Michael Kofman of the Center for Naval Analyses, a US research group, said fighting had taken a “more qualitative turn” with Ukrainian forces appearing to mount offensive operations near the eastern town of Velyka Novosilka and other points in the southern part of the Donetsk region, as well as on its border with the Zaporizhia region.

“These attacks, I don’t believe [them] to be the main offensive effort, but they mark what I think is the beginning of the Ukrainian offensive,” he said.

Al Jazeera’s Jonah Hull, reporting from Kyiv, said that Ukraine has made it clear it will not give “a running commentary on what is going on” as it appears to not “want to give up the element of surprise”.

  • “What is or what may be going on now, well, military analysts have given their view, and their view is that Ukraine is engaged in a series of probing attacks, so-called shaping operations ahead of the counteroffensive,” Hull said.

“Probing Russian weaknesses, looking for vulnerabilities and, at the same time, essentially keeping Russia guessing,” he said.

  • Russia said its forces had fought a two-hour battle with Ukrainian troops in the early hours of Thursday in the Zaporizhia region.
  • Russian Defence Minister Sergei Shoigu said the Ukrainian offensive involved 1,500 soldiers and 150 armoured vehicles.

“The enemy was stopped and retreated after heavy losses,” he said.

Ukrainian Deputy Defence Minister Hanna Maliar said only that Russia was conducting “defensive actions” near the town of Orikhiv in the Zaporizhia region.

According to the ISW, the initial phase of Ukraine’s counteroffensive operations will likely be the most costly and difficult in terms of lives lost and equipment destroyed as troops and armor attempt to penetrate Russia’s defensive positions.

“Militaries have long identified the penetration phase of a mechanized offensive as the most dangerous and costly. The success or failure of this phase may not be apparent for some time,” the ISW said.

>

Imperialst Rhetoric, Tom Horn to Defuse Tensions, Gold Tops $5,000 in Demand Frenzy, . . .Japan Bond Crash

         Stephen Maturen/Getty Images Trump, Democrats Hurtle Toward Shutdown After Minnesota Killing A fatal shooting by Border Patrol agen...