30 September 2021

Bob Dylan - Blowin' in the Wind (Audio)

Lizzo: The Black history of twerking -- and how it taught me self-love |...

Mohamed El-Erian: Inequality Creates Next Big Risk

China unveiled a new version PL-15 the most powerful air-to-air missile ...

Powell, Lagarde, Kuroda, Bailey Seek to Allay Inflation Concerns

U.S. Initial Jobless Claims Rise by 11k to 362,000

"Skin-In-The-Game": When Glaring Conflicts-of-Interest Are So Obvious It's Time To Step Aside

It's about time that someone - anyone - asked. It's never too soon, but why so late at this breaking-point in time for approval of a Climate Action Plan that hinges on one vote?
Let's get right to Nitty Gritty: It’s not illegal for Senator Manchin to own millions of dollars of coal stock – indeed, it illustrates the old saw that the real scandal in Washington is what’s legal – but it certainly raises questions about his impartiality on climate policy.
> Should any lawmaker with such a sizable financial conflict of interest wield decisive influence over what the US government does about a life-and-death issue like the climate emergency? Shouldn’t there be public discussion about whether that lawmaker should recuse himself from such deliberations
Do you have Skin in the Game?. The Mission Newsletter, 4/19/18 | by Mission  | Mission.org | Medium
 
The story: "Joe Manchin has never been this famous. People around the world now know that the West Virginia Democrat is the essential 50th vote in the US Senate that president Joe Biden needs to pass his agenda into law. That includes Biden’s climate agenda. Which doesn’t bode well for defusing the climate emergency, given Manchin’s longstanding opposition to ambitious climate action.
It turns out that the Senator wielding this awesome power – America’s climate decider-in-chief, one might call him – has a massive climate conflict of interest. Joe Manchin, investigative journalism has revealed, is a modern-day coal baron.

The pivotal Democratic senator owns millions of dollars in coal stocks. Shouldn’t he recuse himself from US climate talks?

Joe Manchin, America’s climate decider-in-chief, is a coal baron

Joe Manchin (left) poses with Labor Secretary Marty Walsh in August, during a tour of a coal mine in Dallas, West Virginia.
Joe Manchin (left) poses with Labor Secretary Marty Walsh in August, during a tour of a coal mine in Dallas, West Virginia. Photograph: AP
Supported by
guardian.org
About this content

Last modified on Thu 30 Sep 2021 06.02 EDT

". . .Financial records detailed by reporter Alex Kotch for the Center for Media and Democracy and published in the Guardian show that Manchin makes roughly half a million dollars a year in dividends from millions of dollars of coal company stock he owns.
> The stock is held in Enersystems, Inc, a company Manchin started in 1988 and later gave to his son, Joseph, to run.
> Scientists estimate that 90% of today’s coal reserves must be left in the ground.
> No new coal-fired power plants should be built.
> Existing plants should quickly shift to solar and wind, augmented by reducing electricity demand with better energy efficiency in buildings and machinery (which also saves money and produces more jobs).
> This is not a vision that gladdens a coal baron’s heart. The idea of eliminating fossil fuels is “very, very disturbing”, Manchin said in July when specifics of Biden’s climate agenda surfaced. > Behind the scenes, Manchin reportedly has objected to Biden’s plan to penalize electric utilities that don’t quit coal as fast as science dictates.
> . . .Apparently keen to delay a vote on the bill – but not on the bipartisan infrastructure bill containing billions in subsidies for climate harming programs like making hydrogen from methane – Manchin asked on CNN, “What is the urgency?” of passing the larger bill. Like ExxonMobil, the senator appears to have jettisoned outright climate denial in favor of its more presentable, but no less lethal, cousin: climate delay. . .
 

In the realm of law, a judge who had anything like this level of financial conflict in a case would have to recuse and let a different judge handle the proceedings.

The legal profession’s code of ethics dictates this approach not only because a judge’s financial interest would tempt them to rule in their own favor. It’s also because the two parties litigating the case and the broader public could not have faith that justice had been done by a judge with such a conflict.

Why shouldn’t a similar standard apply to the American public’s faith in government policy, especially when what’s at stake is, you know, the future of life on earth?

(Manchin could still vote for the budget bill; he just couldn’t touch its climate provisions.)

Joe Manchin is surrounded by a gaggle of reporters whenever he steps outside his Senate office, and he frequently appears on the agenda-setting Sunday morning TV shows. With votes on the budget bill fast approaching and the Glasgow summit starting 31 October, it’s high time that journalists press America’s climate decider-in-chief about his glaring conflict of interest – and why he shouldn’t step aside from US climate deliberations."

This story is published as part of Covering Climate Now, a global collaboration of news outlets strengthening coverage of the climate story. Mark Hertsgaard is Covering Climate Now’s executive director

SPECIAL FEATURE TODAY: Back Home On The Arizona Fringe

You might just enjoy it all: https://blogforarizona.net/ 

Latest Posts

2909, 2021

What is Paul Gosar Smoking or Drinking or Inhaling This Week

By |

Following Arizona politics, it is sometimes hard to keep up with the wild, preposterous, and downright crazy statements and acts of some of the Grand Canyon states most "colorful" fringe

2909, 2021

Corporate Democrats Should Not Be Rewarded For Their Bad Faith Obstruction

By |

Permanent musical accompaniment, A Matter of Trust, by Billy Joel (1986). Amanda Marcotte is exactly right: Centrist Dems broke a promise on infrastructure. They should not get their "bipartisan" victory

2909, 2021

Sinema Sells out to Big Pharma as Retirees are Abandoned to Pay High Prescription Prices

By |

This past week Senator Sinema threatened to derail President Biden's legislative agenda for lowering prescription drug prices meanwhile taking more than $750,000 in donations from the pharmaceutical and medical device

2909, 2021

Arizona’s Legislative Traitors to Democracy Name Themselves

By |

To the People of Arizona: A group of Arizona "lawmakers" have outed themselves as the enemies of democracy in an open letter packed with lies, misinformation, and insurrection. They call

2909, 2021

CrowdPAC To Fund A Primary Challenger To Kyrsten Sinema Launched

By |

Yeah, that's a thumbs down to you, princess! Update to Sen. Kyrsten Sinema Is Facing A Vote Of ‘No Confidence’. They elected her to office, now she treats them with

2909, 2021

The ‘Terrible Two’ Are Obstructing The Biden Agenda, To What End?

By |

Greg Sargent and Paul Waldman of the Washington Post make the point that I have been making for months, Memo to centrists: Progressives aren’t your problem. Manchin and Sinema are.:

Smacking-Some-Butts! Making Disgusting Sexual Advances at A Charity Events (Allegatiions made by Trashelle Odom, the wife of Idaho construction executive John Odom)

Political Action Campaigns - particularly those of the Trump variety - too often take titillating twists and turns that frequently grab headlines of the unwanted kind... Bottom Line they want their campaign donation refunded.

Trump donor: Corey Lewandowski made unwanted sexual advances

The longtime Trump aide harassed her at a charity event, a major Republican Party contributor alleges.

President Donald Trump watches as Corey Lewandowski, his former campaign manager, speaks at a rally.
 
The story from Politico late last night: "POLITICO                         

“On the evening of September 26 in Las Vegas, Nevada, I attended a dinner to support a charity and spend time with wonderful friends,” Odom said in a statement to POLITICO. “He repeatedly touched me inappropriately, said vile and disgusting things to me, stalked me, and made me feel violated and fearful,” she said, referring to Lewandowski.

"I am coming forward because he needs to be held accountable,” Odom continued. “I am blessed to have a loving husband and family behind me. I want other women to know that you can be heard, too, and together we can stop terrible things like this from happening.”

Trashelle Odom, the wife of Idaho construction executive John Odom, alleges that Lewandowski repeatedly touched her, including on her leg and buttocks, and spoke to her in sexually graphic terms. Odom said that Lewandowski “stalked” her throughout the evening. . .

David Chesnoff, a Las Vegas attorney representing Lewandowski, did not directly address the allegations. “Accusations and rumors appear to be morphing by the minute and we will not dignify them with a further response,” he said.

Lewandowski, who did not respond to multiple requests for comment, has positioned himself as one of Trump’s closest and most loyal advisers — a role he has leveraged to gain access to top Republican donors and claim influence over the direction of the Republican Party. He was Trump’s first presidential campaign manager in 2016, advised him during the presidency and now is part of the circle of aides advising the former president. His duties included steering a pro-Trump super PAC until Wednesday, when Trump spokesperson Taylor Budowich tweeted after the publication of this article that "Trump World" had severed its association with Lewandowski.. ."

Planet Earth Observations: Decades of Drought on Surface-Waters

Space may be the final frontier
Enlarge / Natural color images from March 1999, April 2005, May 2011, and April 2021 by Landsat satellites chronicle the shrinking Lake Powell reservoir and Lower Colorado River.
New NASA satellite to continue half a century of changing Earth  observations | Ars Technica
 

New NASA satellite to continue half a century of changing Earth observations

"Landsat has provided a critical reference for assessing long-term changes."

Hold "A Delta rocket launched the small Earth Resources Technology Satellite in July 1972 with a simple mission: to capture multi-spectral imagery of the planet and assess changes over time.
Data from the polar-orbiting satellite proved so useful that NASA and the US Geological Survey renamed the vehicle Landsat 1 in 1975, and the organizations have since launched a succession of increasingly sophisticated "Landsat" satellites to continue observations. As a result, we now have a nearly half-century-long record of changes to the planet's surface—from farms and forests to glaciers and urban areas.
While the data from the Landsat missions has proved invaluable, it has also been somewhat depressing. The satellites have amassed an impartial record of tropical deforestation in the Amazon, verifying the claims of environmental protection organizations. They have also cataloged increasing water scarcity in the Western United States and chronicled ice losses across the vast majority of Earth's glaciers.

"Landsat has provided a critical reference for assessing long-term changes to Earth's land environment due to both natural and human forcing," scientists concluded in the journal Remote Sensing of Environment, in 2020. . ."

____________________________________________________________________________

RELATED CONTENT 2021

First-ever water cuts declared for Colorado River in historic drought

Lake Mead, Arizona – Nevada
Watch

Lake Mead, Arizona – Nevada - YouTube

Uploaded by: Google Earth, Apr 25, 2019
5.24K Views · 31 Likes
Earth Timelapse is a global, zoomable time-lapse video of the entire planet, from 1984 to now. Explore this location at: https://g.co/earthtimelapse/#v=36.07...

 

 

____________________________________________________________________________

Biz & IT —

How Google built a 52-terapixel time-lapse portrait of Earth

30-meter-per-pixel video of entire planet.

A frame of Timelapse's view of the growth of Las Vegas, Nevada.
A frame of Timelapse's view of the growth of Las Vegas, Nevada.

>> The report continues ". . .Over 40 years of NASA satellite data has been "ingested into Earth engine," said Sargent. "That's been married to Google's compute infrastructure, so you can detect deforestation or find land use changes."

 

Sargent and the Earth Engine team used 909 terabytes of data from the Landsat 4, 5, and 7 satellites—with each of the million images weighing in at more than 100 megapixels.

Landsat's polar orbit allows each satellite to take a full set of images of the Earth's surface every 16 days. But not all of those images are keepers due to weather and other factors. "It's not as easy as just lining up the pixels," Sargent said. "Most of the challenges involved dealing with the atmosphere—if it's cloudy, you're not seeing anything. And if it's hazy, you have to look through it. So we had to build mosaics that excluded cloudy images and then correct for haze." . .

Time Machine ingests very high-resolution videos and converts them into multiple overlapping multi-resolution video tiles delivered as a stream, using a manipulation of HTML5's video tag in a way similar to how Google uses HTML image tags to pan and zoom in Google Maps.

Previous Time Machine projects had handled videos with billions of pixels of resolution. But Time-Lapse Earth pushed the envelope for Time Machine because of the size of the data. The 30-meter-per-pixel video was generated from 29 Mercator-projected mosaics created by Earth Engine, and each frame had 1.78 trillion pixels.

 

 

 

29 September 2021

About Dave Limp + A Look at The Future: Ambient Intelligence and It's Happening Fast! [Dieter Bohn writing in The Verge]

Every time Amazon announces a new kind of gadget, there’s an inevitable and often justified backlash of concern that it’s further eroding our privacy. Although the company has done lots of work to secure its devices and provide clear and strong protections, the backlash is unavoidable given the nature of the products.

Amazon’s ambient intelligence platform, it’s no longer a joke. The computer is both in the cloud and on the device, and the actual computing happens here, there, and everywhere — and as a consumer, it’s becoming increasingly difficult to locate. . .it’s a messy melange of inputs, outputs, machine learning, and hunches (literally, Amazon calls its technology for predicting your commands “hunches”). Limp says that as many as one out of four actions taken by Alexa devices today are proactive — they’re done by Alexa based on what it has learned about your desires instead of in response to a specific command.

Amazon’s race to create the disappearing computer

Ambient computing is here; now what?

Amazon Unveils New Alexa-Driven Devices

"For his last column in 2017, Walt Mossberg predicted that technology would fade into the background, and so-called “ambient computing” would become ubiquitous. Four years later, we are well on our way — but what exactly that term means for how computers will work and how we’ll live is still very much up in the air.

Many companies are working on some vision of ambient computing, but there’s nobody working harder to try to make the idea of ambient computing happen right now than Amazon’s head of hardware, Dave Limp.

How he’s building that future today is a case study in how Big Tech confounds our preconceived notions of how progress works. We expected AI to look like HAL 9000. Instead, it looks a lot more like a Hammacher Schlemmer catalog.

At Amazon’s yearly lollapalooza of gadget announcements, the company typically announces literally dozens of new Alexa-connected devices. Releasing so many different devices at such a heady clip makes a certain kind of sense: if computers are meant to be all around us, Amazon needs to produce as many different kinds of computers as possible.

This year, among the flood, Limp presented three devices that are paradigmatic of his vision for what he calls “ambient intelligence.”

Subbing out the word “computer” for “intelligence” is a tell that he’s trying to change consumers’ thinking about how our digital lives will work in the future.

Today, however, these three devices are limited to pushing the boundaries of — and our comfort levels with — what we expect out of smart homes. Critically, all three take part in a new kind of computing platform that is unlike what we’re used to seeing from Big Tech. It’s diffuse, dispersed, and sometimes difficult to comprehend. . ."

READ MORE: https://www.theverge.com/22696187/amazon-alexa-ambient-disappearing-computer-limp-interview 

In This Stream

View all 26 stories

 

$999 Amazon Astro: Don't Be Fooled (It isn't a Robot - It's A Camera-on-Wheels)...Part of a Trend of Surveillance Everywhere

 Home Sweet Home oh sure... and take  a close word-for-word look at this report by James Vincent today - and, of course, take the time to read in-between-the-lines

Don’t be fooled — Amazon’s Astro isn’t a home robot, it’s a camera on wheels

New, 27 comments

Whether you like it or not, let’s be clear about what Amazon is selling

 
James Vincent: "Yesterday, Amazon announced its “home robot” — a wheeled device named Astro that has a display, an array of sensors, and a camera that periscopes out the top of its body like a mast. In advertisements for Astro, Amazon presents the device as an engineering breakthrough and the realization of a long-held sci-fi dream: to build a robot that can help around the house.
This is rubbish, of course. What Astro is — for better or worse — is a camera on wheels.
 (Oh, and it absolutely cannot get a beer for you — a recurring meme when companies try to hype home robots).

Easier to Cheat or What??? | FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE | Environmental Quality Omnibus Bill Takes Effect Streamlining and Eliminating Unnecessary Regulations

Hmmm something suspicious

News Release

Environmental Quality Omnibus Bill Takes Effect Streamlining and Eliminating Unnecessary Regulations

House Bill 2580 achieves highest number of deregulatory, clean-up and technical corrections in Department history

PHOENIX (Sept. 29, 2021) – Arizona Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ) officials today thank Governor Doug Ducey for signing House Bill 2580 (HB 2580) into law. Sponsored by Representative Gail Griffin, this legislation reduces unnecessary regulations, while continuing to promote environmentally responsible economic growth in Arizona.

In response to Governor Ducey’s Executive Order 2015-01, HB 2580 is part of ADEQ’s continuous evaluation of existing statutes and rules to identify and remove, simplify or correct duplicative, contradictory and ambiguous regulatory hurdles. HB 2580 successfully repeals 15 pieces of statute, amends an additional five statutes, and enables ADEQ to streamline three sections of rule from the Arizona Administrative Code, offering tangible benefits to both Arizona taxpayers and industry.

“This is the latest in a series of omnibus bills I have sponsored to make it easier to do business with ADEQ without reducing ADEQ’s ability to protect public health and the environment,” said Representative Gail Griffin.

“ADEQ is committed to achieving positive mission outcomes through efficient, effective government at the speed of business,” said ADEQ Director Misael Cabrera. “Streamlined regulations eliminate waste from our processes and increase our capacity to work with our customers to do more mission-critical work for Arizonans and our unique environment."

Details:

The latest in a series of bills enacted to improve the ADEQ regulatory structure, HB 2580 accomplishes the following:

Eliminates statutes:

  • Repeals a duplicative requirement to adopt a process related to Water Quality Assurance Revolving Fund (WQARF) boundaries. (A.R.S. §49-289.01(C))
  • Repeals requirements for state-owned hazardous waste facilities that were adopted in 1980 since there are no such sites, no intention of creating any, and to eliminate conflict with a mandate that state statute not be more stringent than federal law. (A.R.S. §49-902 – §49-905)
  • Repeals a one-time requirement to conduct a hazardous air pollutants study and issue a report, which was satisfied in 1995. (A.R.S. §49-426.08)
  • Repeals the diesel roadside testing pilot program and its corresponding civil penalties, which were determined as unfeasible in 2002 . (A.R.S. §49-542.06 and §49-542.07)
  • Repeals the requirement for the Department to write rules related to changing air quality attainment area designations, since the federal Clean Air Act already mandates the process. (A.R.S. §49-405(B)(2))
  • Repeals the annual requirement for consumers of newsprint to certify the amount of recycled newsprint purchased the previous year, since it no longer provides environmental benefit. When this statute was enacted in 1990, landfilled newsprint made up a significant portion of the nation’s waste stream. Since then, newsprint in the waste stream has decreased by 85 percent. (A.R.S. §49-834)

Modifies statutes:

  • Aligns air quality public hearing notice timeframes with federal and state regulations. (A.R.S. §49-425)
  • Makes the development of criteria governing disbursement of solid waste planning and assistance funds to county, city or town management agencies discretionary instead of mandatory, since funds have never been appropriated for this purpose. (A.R.S. §49-724)
  • Removes a requirement to include a summary of Pollution Prevention Report reviews in an annual report that, due to a statutory change in 2003, the agency is no longer required to produce. (A.R.S. §49-964(C))
  • Removes a requirement for the Joint Legislative Budget Committee (JLBC) to review Vehicle Emissions Inspection Program Contracts, since the requirement for JLBC to review the initial contract was repealed in 2011 and JLBC has not unfavorably reviewed any contract amendment for over a decade. (A.R.S. §49-545(G))
  • Removes the requirement for ADEQ to develop a response to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Clean Power Plan (CPP), including coordination with and reporting to a defunct legislative committee, since EPA did not adopt the CPP. (A.R.S. §49-459)
  • Allows ADEQ to convene WQARF Community Advisory Board meetings at any time in response to a public or municipal request or site condition changes, instead of on a mandated quarterly basis. (A.R.S. §49-289.03(F)(2))

View ADEQ’s 2021 Legislative Summary > 

 AZDEQ Logo QUESTIONS?
Contact Us