Amistad Project Releases Report on Mark Zuckerberg’s ‘Dark Money’ in 2020 Elections
The Amistad Project of the Thomas More Society released a report Wednesday documenting the effect of donations by Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg to private-public partnerships that turned out the vote in key Democratic counties in 2020.
The report, titled “The Legitimacy and Effect of Private Funding in Federal and State Election Processes,” alleges that when Zuckerberg gave money to government institutions to assist with elections during the coronavirus pandemic, the donations were targeted at Democrat-heavy areas in swing states with the specific purpose of tilting the election to Joe Biden.
The report, according to Amistad Project director Phil Kline, documented the use of “more than one half of a billion dollars, more than the federal government expended [$400 million] in the CARES Act, to fund the election during the COVID crisis.
“This, effectively, is a shadow government running our elections,” he added. “A half a billion dollars into the hands of state and local officials who, in turn, allowed those private organizations, and private interests, to have access to sensitive and private information of American citizens that was of value to political parties, and monetized for interests on the left.”
Kline said that Zuckerberg’s money had encouraged states to violate their own laws, and act contrary to federal law, in turning out specific groups of voters and suppressing turnout among other groups of voters, violating the Constitution . . .
The lawsuit, based on a report authored by the organization, will claim that Zuckerberg used $500 million of “dark money” to unlawfully tip the scales in battleground states that Democrat Joe Biden won by narrow margins, said Mark Serrano, a Trump 2020 campaign adviser who runs a communications firm that handles media relations for the Amistad Project. The lawsuit is expected to be filed by today in the District Court for the District of Columbia and will cover alleged election irregularities that took place in Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, Michigan, Arizona, and Georgia.
NEW lawsuit will be filed against Zuckerberg dark money that enabled the fraud in key states.@PhillDKline@ThomasMoreSocpic.twitter.com/yuTN2ilufb
— TheSharpEdge (@TheSharpEdge1) December 16, 2020
According to Serrano, the legal complaint takes aim at “the ecosystem” that caused “fraud on a massive level to take place” during the 2020 contest. He accused Zuckerberg of using his vast financial resources and influence to undermine the presidential election in the months leading up to, and continuing after, November 3.
A billionaire, Mark Zuckerberg, was allowed in the counting room because he funded it, and the American people were kicked out.
The lawsuit announcement coincided with the release of a report by the Amistad Project which outlines how Zuckerberg allegedly used private funding to “improperly” influence the election outcome.
BIG TECH.💻🚨"Funded by HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS of dollars from FACEBOOK founder Mark Zuckerberg & other high-tech interests, activist orgs. created a two-tiered election system..."This is "contrary to both federal law & state election plans" according to SCATHING new report.🔻 pic.twitter.com/jDGmeqgd3g
— Kyle Becker (@kylenabecker) December 16, 2020
Joe Biden was declared president-elect by the Electoral College on Monday, but US President Donald Trump and his allies continue to argue that the Democrats’ victory is illegitimate due to large-scale fraud. "
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Want some more ?? 
". . .According to the Amistad Project, a research report shows that “the December 8 ‘safe harbor’ deadline for appointing presidential Electors does not apply to states where flagrant violations of state election laws affected the outcome of the popular vote. In fact, the only Constitutionally-set date in the election process is the assumption of office by the President on January 20.
. . .The research paper cited by Amistad examined the history of the Electoral College deadlines. These dates are “not only elements of a 72-year old federal statute with zero Constitutional basis, but are also actively preventing the states from fulfilling their constitutional—and ethical—obligation to hold free and fair elections,” the group said in the release.
“Experts believe that the primary basis for these dates was to provide enough time to affect the presidential transition of power, a concern which is fully obsolete in the age of internet and air travel,” their news release added.
. . .“Through rigorous investigations supporting our litigation, we demonstrate that state and local officials brazenly violated election laws in several swing states in order to advance a partisan political agenda,” stated Phill Kline, the head of the Amistad Project. “As a result, it is impossible for those states to determine their presidential Electors in line with the arbitrary deadline set forth via federal statute in 1948, and thus, the only deadline that matters is January 20, 2021.”
Their news release posited that the Constitution places the plenary authority in designating electors to legislatures. As a result, the elected representatives should “judge the relevant facts and appoint an appropriate slate of Electors, subject only to the sole deadline set forth in the U.S. Constitution.”
After the Electoral College votes, members of the House and Senate will read the votes during the Joint Session of Congress on Jan. 6, 2021. Inauguration Day is Jan. 20, 2021.
The group’s claim came after Trump lawyers Rudy Giuliani and Jenna Ellis lobbied the state legislatures in Georgia, Arizona, Michigan, and Pennsylvania to assert their power to call up electors
No comments:
Post a Comment