News
Daily coverage of the global space industry with an emphasis on business and political news
✓ FIRST THIS: MISSION NS 23 ...AN "ANOMALY" Blue Origin’s New Shepard-23 (NS-23) uncrewed payload mission encountered an issue when the booster failed, which caused a fire and a subsequent ground impact. The capsule escape system successfully separated the capsule from the booster thou, and no injuries were reported. The company is currently examining what caused the anomaly.
.jpg)
Among the NS-23 payloads are tens of thousands of postcards from Blue Origin’s nonprofit, Club for the Future, whose Postcards to Space program gives people across the world access to space on New Shepard. The Club’s mission is to inspire future generations to pursue careers in STEM for the benefit of Earth.
Congress asks for more transparency into New Shepard failure investigation 
The New Shepard capsule fired its launch abort motor to get away from its booster after a malfunction about a minute after liftoff on an uncrewed mission Sept. 12. Credit: New Shepard webcast
PARIS — Leaders of the House space subcommittee have asked the Federal Aviation Administration for more details on its investigation into a Blue Origin New Shepard launch accident.
In a Sept. 15 letter to Billy Nolen, acting administrator of the FAA, Reps. Don Beyer (D-Va.) and Brian Babin (R-Texas) sought more details into the FAA’s ongoing investigation into the Sept. 12 failure of the New Shepard vehicle on an uncrewed suborbital flight designated NS-23.
They wrote that their interest, not usually seen in other commercial launch failures, stems from the fact that New Shepard also carries people. “On a different day with a different mission, this vehicle’s anomaly could have put human lives in danger,” they wrote. The particular vehicle involved in the failure had only been used for uncrewed flights; a different New Shepard vehicle has flown Blue Origin’s crewed flights since July 2021.
Beyer and Babin, the chair and ranking member, respectively, of the House Science Committee’s space subcommittee, mentioned their responsibility of providing oversight of the FAA’s commercial space transportation office and commercial launch and reentry in general for their desire for more information into the investigation, including, ultimately the root cause and steps to correct the problem that caused it They also asked for a briefing of subcommittee staff within 10 days.
.jpg)
The letter was not the first time Beyer commented on the accident. “Today’s booster failure of NS-23 is a compelling reminder of the risks of spaceflight,” Beyer said in a statement hours after the incident. “As commercial human spaceflight is now a reality, the subcommittee’s work on the safety of commercial human spaceflight is more important than ever.”
Neither the FAA nor Blue Origin have provided more details about the incident, when an apparent problem with the vehicle’s booster triggered the launch escape motor of the capsule, taking it safely away from the booster. The capsule, carrying three dozen payloads that included a number of NASA-sponsored experiments, landed safely under parachutes several minutes later. Blue Origin said the booster was destroyed.
The FAA confirmed Sept. 12 that it was leading the investigation into the accident. That work would have gone to the National Transportation Safety Board, under terms of an agreement the agencies signed Sept. 9, had anyone been killed or seriously injured, or if debris that could have caused death or serious injury fell outside the launch site.
A Blue Origin executive, Jarrett Jones, said at World Satellite Business Week Sept. 13 that it was still “super early” into the investigation. He played down speculation that the failure was linked to an issue with the booster’s BE-3 engine. “It’s a little premature to assume that it was something related to the engine.”
RELATED CONTENT Videos
News
Daily coverage of the global space industry with an emphasis on business and political news.
No comments:
Post a Comment