The idea that Trump hatched a plan to destroy evidence dramatically increases the seriousness of the case against him, threatening to amplify his infamy in the history books. And if proven at trial next year, it could very well derail his ambitions to return to the White House in 2025.
Donald Trump Finally Has His Richard Nixon Moment
TRICKY
It’s not the crime; it’s the coverup.
Published Jul. 31, 2023 4:50AM EDT
Jose Pagliery
And yet, these new charges may do just that.
While the superseding indictment may not seem any more serious than the original charges, they could substantially aid special prosecutor Jack Smith in getting a conviction—both in the public’s eye and in an actual courtroom.
- And with this new evidence, that Trump directed assistants to wipe a computer server that would show security footage at his South Florida club—evidence that Trump not only knew he was doing something wrong, but also that he tried to conceal the whole affair—Smith may have the smoking gun. Just like Nixon’s accusers did when they found out the president wouldn’t turn over White House tapes—and that there was an 18-minute gap in the audio. . .
- But the parallels between Nixon and Trump could veer sharply in different directions, presidential scholars said—it’s all up to American voters next year.
Nixon faced a Republican Party that couldn’t stomach being led by a humiliated and disgraced politician. Today’s GOP has so far remained loyal to Trump, no matter the embarrassment.
“I think Trump sees it’s in his best interest to keep fighting, because his only way out at this point is to win an election and pardon himself—or get the Department of Justice to shut this down,” Edelson said.
And that leads to what former journalist Luke Nichter, now a presidential historian at Chapman University, calls the real takeaway here.
- “With Trump’s base, you could impeach him 10 times. That’s the lesson of Nixon and Watergate: It pays to be partisan.
- It doesn’t matter what the evidence is, you stand by your leader. Since Watergate, that’s what parties have done.”
\> DAILY BEAST
No comments:
Post a Comment