19 March 2018

Background,Comments, Outlays Re: Item 5-e [Toxic Waste] Mesa City Council Meeting Mon 19 March 2018

^^^ HEADS UP ^^^Without the question raised at the Thu 16 March 2018 Study Session about Item 5e by District 1 Councilmember Mark Freeman, your MesaZona blogger may have taken less notice of this pending Ordinance - it made sense to pay more attention when a city official was in-place and ready to explain Freeman's inquiry on an item in District 6 with an immediate response on camera.
The City is investing over $150 million to construct the Signal Butte Water Treatment Plant, which will add an additional 24 million gallons per day (MGD) of pumping capacity to the area by Summer 2018.
In addition, a $200 million expansion of the existing Greenfield Water Reclamation Plant will also enhance wastewater capacity in the area by 14 MGD, bringing the total plant capacity to 30 MGD.
_________________________________________________________________________
Blogger Note: Please see farther on in this post for related content, including a report from the Arizona Center for Investigative Reporting
_________________________________________________________________________
Readers might want to take note that water is a precious resource here in the desert and the East Valley.
On top of the $150,000,000 for SBWTP and the $200,000,000 for the GWTP, take a look>
As you can see in the infographic to the right, the taxpayer burden for costs in the City of Mesa's FY17/18 Wastewater Treatment Bond Projects in this fiscal year's budget amount to $45,3000,000 23.9%.
Together with the costs of water at $80,9000,000 (42.5%) they consume 2/3 or 66.3% of the entire Budget Pie.
Wastewater costs more than 2X as much as the total amount spent on Parks and 5x as much as money spent on Electric.
________________________________________________________________________
Abundant Water and Waste Water Capacity The City of Mesa maintains a substantial water and wastewater infrastructure network in the Zone, and is continuing to expand to accommodate for future industry growth.
The City is investing over $150 million to construct the Signal Butte Water Treatment Plant, which will add an additional 24 million gallons per day (MGD) of pumping capacity to the area by Summer 2018.
In addition, a $200 million expansion of the existing Greenfield Water Reclamation Plant will also enhance wastewater capacity in the area by 14 MGD, bringing the total plant capacity to 30 MGD.
http://www.mesaaz.gov/business/economic-development/business-districts-maps/mesa-gateway-area/pecos-advanced-manufacturing-zone

Major Employers
  • Bridgestone Americas – R&D facility conducting research and developing manufacturing process to produce rubber from the Guayule plant
  • CMC Steel – Micro steel mill producing rebar from recycled steel
  • CRM Rubber – Producer and supplier of crumb rubber to the asphalt industry. Largest crumb rubber producer in the western U.S.
  • FUJIFILM – Manufacturer of chemicals for the semiconductor industry
  • Matheson TriGas – Producer and supplier of industrial gasses used in manufacturing industries such as steel, fabrication, medical, water treatment, semiconductors, chemicals and food freezing
  • Metso – Provider of industrial equipment repair and field services for the mining, aggregates, and process industries
  • Mitsubishi Gas Chemical – manufacturer of chemicals for the semiconductor industry
  • TRW Vehicle Safety Systems – Manufacturer of airbag components
The two companies that are mentioned in response to Councilmember Freeman's question are included in the map image here:
PAMZ Mesa Map
________________________________________________________________________
The response included why the city put the ordinance on the agenda: actions about monitoring, measuring and reporting toxic emissions taken by ADEQ (see link below)
Here's the 10:42 video of that 'study session' uploaded to YouTube by Mesa Channel 11 - other than very few members of the public in attendance in the Lower Chambers, only 19 viewers have bothered to watch:
Please take the time to watch the comment made by Mark Freeman and the ready response provided by a city official - two manufacturing operations were cited as sources of possible contaminants discharged into the city's wastewater treatment pipeline - both the Signal Butte Water Treatment Plant and the Greenfield Water Treatment Plant, in the southeast and northeast quadrants of Mesa are in close proximity to former military bases where the discharge of contaminants have been issues for remediation. ADEQ the Arizona Department of Environmental Quality, has the responsibility for both clean air and water.
Note the location of the two companies mentioned in Freeman's follow-up discussion in this map provided by the City's Office of Economic Development.
The industrial manufacturing facilities are located by the red locator pints clustered in the bottom right where you can see areas of former irrigated agricultural lands close to the former Williams Air Base.
In 1989 the former airbase was slated for clean-up of contaminated hazardous wastes. (See more information below)
It's NOT a non-issue then or now.

________________________________________________________________________
After receiving an email asking for stakeholder input from the Arizona Department of Environmental Quality, your MesaZona blogger uploaded this post > https://mesazona.blogspot.com/2018/03/clean-healthy-air-your-feedback.html
Request for Stakeholder Input
ADEQ seeks your input on one or both of the following topics:
  • Appropriate Reporting Threshold: Rule 327 requires facilities that emit over 2.5 tons per year facility wide to report all emissions, which could be interpreted as requiring reporting for all emission units, no matter how small the emission rate. 
  • For example, a permitted source could be found to be violating Rule 327 if they failed to account for an emission source that emitted less than 0.1 lbs over the previous year.  At what point should ADEQ consider emission units to be de minimis?
  • Appropriate Accuracy Threshold: For emissions that are reported, Rule 327 does not specify an appropriate accuracy level.  
  • For example, should a source be expected to report 50 tons per year or 50.07 tons per year or 50.074 tons per year?  At what point should ADEQ consider the result of an emission calculation accurate?
Please address your comments to:
Michael Burton, Environmental Science Specialist III,
Burton.Michael@azdeq.gov 602-771-4562 
________________________________________________________________________
However, there's more background to be aware of from earlier research investigating pollution topics on toxic chemical releases from July 14, 1989
[see below]
(Groundwater contains VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS (VOCS) and nitrates. Soils contain various VOCS from past disposal practices. Accidental ingestion of contaminated soil and groundwater is a potential health hazard.)
File #: 18-0266   
Type: Ordinance Status: Agenda Ready
In control: City Council
On agenda: 3/19/2018
Title: Amending Title 8, Chapter 4, Section 15 “Prohibited Substances and Discharge Limitations” of the Mesa City Code, a part of the Sanitary Sewer Regulations, to include a provision regarding establishment of wastewater discharge pollutant mass limitations for industrial users. (Citywide)
Attachments: 1. Council Report, 2. Ordinance

COUNCIL REPORT:
_________________________________________________________________________
Conditions at proposal (July 14, 1989):
Williams Air Force Base (WAFB) covers 4,127 acres approximately 30 miles southeast of Phoenix, Arizona, in Maricopa County, near Chandler. The base is surrounded by irrigated farmland or desert. Since the base was constructed in 1941, it has served as a training facility, primarily pilot training. Industrial activities at WAFB have included heavy maintenance of aircraft and ground equipment in support of pilot training. WAFB is participating in the Installation Restoration Program (IRP), established in 1978. Under this program, the Department of Defense seeks to identify, investigate, and clean up contamination from hazardous materials.
As part of IRP, the Air Force has identified a number of potentially contaminated areas, including Fire Protection Training Area No. 2, which covers approximately 8.5 acres near the southern boundary of the base. Prior to 1948, the area was used as a parking apron. From 1948 until the late 1960s, it was an unlined pit where large quantities of the flammable liquid waste generated at WAFB were burned as part of fire training. Any flammable materials remaining infiltrated the soil or evaporated. These materials included waste fuels, oils, lubricants, cleaning solvents, and some paint stripper. Starting in 1983, a concrete liner was installed under the burn pits; however, overflow is still allowed to seep into the ground.  More... 
Superfund Site Report: WILLIAMS AIR FORCE BASE

Source: http://scorecard.goodguide.com/env-releases/land/site.tcl?epa_id=AZ7570028582
__________________________________________________________________________
RELATED CONTENT:
Feb 6, 2018 - ... these sectors are complying with their permit limits and conditions. Working with authorized states, EPA's focus on facilities in these industrial sectors, driven by water pollution data, will build compliance with Clean Water Act discharge permits and cut illegal pollution discharges, that impact water quality

2.8 million Arizonans live within vulnerable zones from toxic chemical leaks
[Editor’s Note: This is part of an ongoing series of stories in which the ABC15 Investigators and the Arizona Center for Investigative Reporting collaborated to explore how Arizona regulates the storage and transportation of hazardous chemicals across the state.]
By Brandon Quester, AZCIR | Lauren Gilger and Maria Tomasch, ABC15 
PHOENIX – More than 2.8 million Arizona residents — or 44 percent of the state’s population — live within areas that are most vulnerable to a catastrophic accidental release of gaseous, and sometimes explosive hazardous chemicals.
The toxic agents, which the Environmental Protection Agency deems extremely hazardous, include chemicals such as anhydrous ammonia, chlorine and hydrofluoric acid. They are stored in more than 100 facilities that dot the Arizona landscape . . .
The radius of these danger zones can reach up to 22 miles from the center of the incident. They include clouds of toxic gases or explosions from flammable materials in the worst possible accident scenarios at Arizona facilities designated by the EPA as a serious risk to residential populations.
The “worst-case” scenarios are part of  the EPA’s Risk Management Plan (RMP) law, which requires facilities storing large amounts of hazardous materials to file the plans for emergency planning and risk assessment purposes. The companies include water treatment plants, grocery store distribution centers and commonly known businesses such as Target, Wal-Mart and Shamrock Farms.
The EPA is tasked with collecting and maintaining these records, but a patchwork of state and federal regulations make it unclear whether the plans are effective in protecting surrounding communities,
READ MORE > https://azcir.org/az-risk-management-plans-epa/






 

No comments:

No comment