NOTE: "...Jack Lynch, chief operating officer for EducationSuperHighway, said
in an interview that the FCC is not checking to see if every unit in an
apartment building has adequate broadband service. Instead, he said, it
considers an entire building served if service is adequate in one
location, which Lynch said could miss people who have poor service and
underestimate how many people in a state do not have high-speed
connections.
✓ As a result, the map may not illuminate “digital
redlining,” in which broadband companies have failed to create strong
service in poorer areas, EducationSuperHighway’s director of government
affairs and policy, Scott Quinn, said at a conference last week
organized by NewDeal, a group of progressive state and local officials.
“Low-income
and public housing buildings may have wiring that goes to the leasing
office or to the common area, or a convenience store on the first
floor,” he said. “But that doesn't mean that the units in that building
actually have that same speed.”
"In several states around the country, officials say they are finding
major problems with a crucial, new federal map meant to show the
adequacy of internet service at the household level.
The Federal Communications Commission map, released last month,
is critical in determining how the Biden administration will distribute
billions of dollars in federal broadband funding from last year’s
infrastructure law around the country. But state and local officials say
they’re seeing discrepancies that have them concerned the money will
not go to the places where it’s most needed to give Americans improved
access to high-speed internet.
With a deadline looming in just
over a month for states to find inaccuracies in the map that could
affect how much of the money they’ll get, some heads of state broadband
offices and local officials are saying the federal government should
offer more time to find and report problems.
Each state in the
nation is guaranteed to receive at least $100 million from the $42.5
billion Broadband Equity, Access, and Deployment program in the
Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act to build or improve broadband
networks in areas that lack service.
The concern among state and
local officials is that the National Telecommunications and Information
Administration will use the FCC’s map to decide by June 30 how to spread
around the rest of the money, which is the bulk of what’s available.
The agency will determine how much each state will get based on the
extent to which they have poor internet access.
State and local
officials acknowledge that the latest map more accurately shows what
parts of the country have, or do not have, adequate service compared to a
previous version. But still, state broadband directors and others see
significant flaws.
In Vermont, for instance, Robert Fish, deputy
director of the state’s broadband office, said in an interview that
nearly 22%, or nearly a fourth of the locations in the state, aren’t
even on a draft of the FCC’s map, meaning they would not be counted if
they have poor service.
Another 11% of locations in the state on the FCC map do not have recognizable addresses, he said.
“We're
very concerned,” Fish said. “The way the map is set up right now, and
the way the program is set up right now in terms of allocations, runs
the risk of leaving Vermont residents behind. And it's not just Vermont
residents, it’s residents everywhere.”
“There needs to be more time to get this right,” Fish added. “This is a generational opportunity.”
In
Washington state, broadband director Mark Vasconi said he’s still
working with cities and counties to figure out how accurate the FCC map
is. But already, he said, researchers he is working with have found a
major problem that makes him question the map’s accuracy.
Sixty
percent of residences and businesses in one town on tribal land do not
appear on the FCC’s map. And since the locations are likely to not have
adequate service, not including them could underestimate how much money
the state needs.
An FCC spokeswoman told Route Fifty that the
agency is committed to fixing as many inaccuracies “as possible” before
NTIA decides how much each state will get.
But to do that, the
spokeswoman said the FCC and the NTIA are encouraging states and
territories to raise problems with the map “as soon as possible and no
later than January 13, 2023 to give them the best opportunity for those
challenges to be included in the version of the map that NTIA will use
for its allocations.”
NTIA spokesman Charles Meisch stressed the
Jan. 13 date isn’t a hard deadline. But he also said that in order to
fix any problems before NTIA decides how to spread the money around, it
would be best to report any inaccuracies by the date, just a little over
a month away.
While Vermont has already filed a challenge with
the FCC to fix the problems it has found, Fish said the magnitude of how
wrong the map is in his state has him concerned about whether other
states and localities will have enough time to find all the inaccuracies
that exist within the next month, particularly with the holidays
approaching.
Washington’s Vasconi said he doesn’t want to “throw rocks” at the FCC.
“This
map is, I think, a really honest attempt to increase the accuracy,” he
said. But because of the discrepancies he’s seen, including the missing
homes and businesses on tribal land, “we don't know how incorrect it is,
right?”
“I think it's pretty clear from some of our initial examinations, it's pretty wrong,” Vasconi added.
Fish
said NTIA should send states the minimum $100 million they are
guaranteed. But the rest of the money should not be divvied up until
it’s clear the problems with the map are fixed.
Vasconi agreed,
saying that with more time to identify shortcomings, the map will become
more accurate. “If you get the map wrong, and you use this version of
the map, you're gonna be basing funding decisions and funding
allocations on what is the least accurate of these maps because the maps
will subsequently be getting better,” he said. “Slow it down to get it
right.”
While the broadband dollars will go to states to decide
how to distribute, county and city officials are also concerned about
the tight timeline. State broadband offices are relying on local
governments to help identify problems with the map. But if they’re
unable to flag potential inaccuracies in the next month, it could affect
how much their states get and pass on to them.
Palm Beach
County, Florida Commissioner Gregg Weiss, a member of the National
Association of Counties’ Broadband Task Force, said the group has
discussed asking the FCC to push back the deadline, and could decide to
make the request at a meeting next week.
“There is concern over
how much time we have and that’s especially true with our more rural
counties that have even less resources, and the ability to be able to
review the data and respond effectively and accordingly,” Weiss said.
Gerard
Lederer, a broadband consultant who works with the National League of
Cities and other local governments, stressed that local officials,
particularly in cities, are grateful to the Biden administration for
providing the funding. But he said they are also worried about the
timeline. “I think a lot of local government officials would like there
to be more time, given state broadband offices are saying that they
don't have enough time,” he said.
Sen. Shelley Moore Capito, a
West Virginia Republican and a co-founder of the Senate Broadband
Caucus, has also raised doubts about the map.
“After careful
review, I have some concerns about how these maps represent West
Virginia’s coverage,” she said in a video shared on social media, urging
people in her state to check the quality of broadband service the FCC
says they have and file their own challenge if it’s wrong.
Criticism of the maps extends beyond just what street addresses and geographic areas are and aren’t served. . .
“Low-income and public housing buildings may have wiring that goes to
the leasing office or to the common area, or a convenience store on the
first floor,” he said. “But that doesn't mean that the units in that
building actually have that same speed.”
“What we're seeing is
that a lot of these buildings in high poverty areas are being marked as
served and we know for a fact that they're not,” Quinn added.
A
national nonprofit, which advocates for increasing broadband access,
EducationSuperHighway founded the No Home Left Offline Coalition, whose
members include the National League of Cities, the National Association
of Counties and African American Mayors Association.
In addition,
Vermont’s Fish complained that the map judges whether or not a home or a
business has adequate service based on what broadband companies
advertise as the available speed in an area. In addition, under the
FCC’s procedure, the burden is on those filing a challenge to prove
their internet speeds are not adequate, he said.
Fish called it a “half-baked” approach to assessing service.
For
example, he said the map shows some rural parts of Vermont have
adequate broadband because companies advertise high enough speeds
through wireless service. But that may not be what customers actually
experience in those areas due to terrain and other factors.
“If
you cut down all the trees and maybe blow the top off the mountain,”
broadband speeds could be as advertised, Fish said. “It's just not
grounded in reality,” he added. “It's grounded in the advertising of
these companies that have a big motive to show that they have coverage.”