Both Apple and Android saw increasing instances of detected vulnerabilities.
A 138% increase in critical Android vulnerabilities was discovered in 2022, while Apple iOS accounted for 80% of the zero-day vulnerabilities actively exploited in the wild.
Improper cloud storage configurations in mobile apps are a leading attack surface. ±2% of all iOS and ±10% of all Android mobile apps accessed insecure cloud instances.
The Zimperium 2023 Global Mobile Threat Report examines the trends that shaped the mobile security landscape over the last year and analyzes research from Zimperium’s zLabs team, as well as third-party industry data, partner insights, and observations from leading industry experts.
2,000
malware samples detected by Zimperium each week last year that had not been identified by the industry
80%
of phishing attacks targeted mobile devices, or were designed to function on both mobile devices and desktops
51%
increase in the total number of unique mobile malware samples detected by Zimperium year-over-year
43%
of all compromised devices were fully exploited, not jailbroken or rooted – an increase of 187% YOY
80%
of the zero day mobile vulnerabilities actively being exploited in the past year were for iOS
14%
of mobile apps using cloud storage were vulnerable due to unsecured configurations
138%
year-over-year increase in critical Android vulnerabilities discovered
6 – 10
times users are more likely to fall for an SMS phishing attack than an email-based attack
The rapid growth in Mobile Devices and app usage has created an ever-growing attack surface and risks in organizations. According to last year’s report, 60% of endpoints accessing company assets were mobile devices. Mobile-powered firms must strengthen mobile security procedures to secure employee’s personal data and critical organizational information.” Improper configurations and minimal user awareness of phishing and smishing create devices prone to high-security risks. Zimperium, a mobile security platform for mobile devices and apps, has released its highly anticipated Global Mobile Threat Report 2023.
As per the Global threat report of 2023 is that 43% of all compromised devices were fully exploited, an increase of 187% year-over-year. Phishing attacks on mobile devices are becoming more prevalent. 80% of phishing sites are designed to run on both desktop and mobile platforms. Meanwhile, SMS phishing or smishing attacks are six to ten times more likely to be successful than email-based attacks. From their anti-phishing technology, they have found an average of four malicious/phishing links clicked from every device EMEA and North America have the greatest percentage of infected devices, with EMEA at 35% and North America at 25%, respectively. Both Apple and Android saw increasing instances of detected vulnerabilities. A 138% increase in critical Android vulnerabilities was discovered in 2022, while Apple iOS accounted for 80% of the zero-day vulnerabilities actively exploited in the wild. Improper cloud storage configurations in mobile apps are a leading attack surface. ±2% of all iOS and ±10% of all Android mobile apps accessed insecure cloud instances. In order to succeed, businesses need to adopt a mobile-first security strategy, in which risk is continuously prioritized and assessed as close to the user and device as feasible, and where the vulnerability posture is baselined and assessed regularly so that operations may take place in a known state with full visibility. They need to take prompt action in the areas of risk identification and mitigation, including the use of zero trust and conditional access workflows, XDR, and autonomous third-party integrations, as well as the assessment and maintenance of knowledge regarding global privacy rules. “This should be a wake-up call for enterprises to increase focus and investment in mobile security tools and practices.”
New Research Reveals 187% Increase in Sophisticated Attacks Against Mobile Devices
The rapid growth in Mobile Devices and app usage has created an ever-growing attack surface and risks in organizations. According to last year’s report, 60% of endpoints accessing company assets were mobile devices.
Demonstrators hold signs while picketing during the continuing strike by the Writers Guild of America (WGA) in Los Angeles, California, on May 26, 2023. Frederic J. Brown/AFP via Getty Images
Alissa Wilkinson covers film and culture for Vox. Alissa is a member of the New York Film Critics Circle and the National Society of Film Critics.
Editor’s note, June 30, 10:57 pm ET: On June 30, the day the SAG-AFTRA contract was set to expire, the guild announced that the negotiation had been extended to July 12. On June 23, the DGA voted to approve its contract with AMPTP; 41 percent of the guild’s membership voted, and 87 percent of voters ratified. WGA remains on strike.
Editor’s note, June 6, 10:30 am ET: On June 3, DGA leadership announced it had reached a tentative contract agreement, which has not yet been ratified by the guild’s membership. On June 5, two days ahead of the start of bargaining, SAG-AFTRA membership voted by an overwhelming 97.91 percent margin to authorize a strike, a move designed to give them leverage at the bargaining table. WGA remains on strike.
Our original story, published on June 2, follows.
The Hollywood writers strike marked its one-month anniversary on Friday, with no signs of slowing down. While other guilds in the industry are still on the job — except when they’re blocked by picket lines — the writers may soon get company on those picket lines.
Two other major entertainment guilds, the Directors Guild of America (DGA) and Screen Actors Guild (SAG-AFTRA), also entered the summer with looming contract expiration dates. Both groups’ agreements with AMPTP, the trade association that represents the industry’s film and TV production companies, end on June 30. A lot could happen between now and then, but the situation is looking dicey.
All of that means that come July 1, the studios may be facing a double or even triple strike, in effect shutting Hollywood down completely.
The DGA rarely strikes — the last time was in 1987 — and its leadership has not called for a strike authorization vote. But its relations with the AMPTP have been trickier than usual. Negotiations began on May 10, with demands that in part mirror the WGA’s concerns. The main sticking point is wage and residual increases that keep in step with rising costs of living. In particular, lower residuals for shows on streaming services, where the lion’s share of entertainment now lives, have wreaked havoc for many people in the industry, drastically reducing compensation and making it increasingly difficult to just pay the bills.
A rally at 30 Rock in New York. Michael M. Santiago/Getty Images
In the past, the DGA has sometimes managed to make an agreement with AMPTP ahead of the start of bargaining, effectively setting a pattern for the WGA and SAG-AFTRA to follow in their own demands. Last November, the DGA sent a “pre-negotiation” offer to the AMPTP, seeking resolution ahead of bargaining. The AMPTP reportedly rejected the DGA’s proposal, meaning both parties came to the bargaining table without an arrangement.
The situation seemed to intensify due to an unforced error. On May 23, Warner Bros. Discovery launched Max, its newly rebranded streaming platform, which had previously been named HBO Max. Eagle-eyed observers noticed that in listed credits, the platform lumped writers, directors, producers, and so on into one category labeled “creators.” Aside from the queasy implications that the greatest works of cinema and television were just “content,” the choice on the company’s part ran afoul of hard-fought contract regulations regarding credits for artists.
It was a weird choice, and one that set blood boiling in Hollywood. The presidents of the WGA and the DGA issued a rare joint statement, with DGA president Lesli Linka Glatter noting, “The devaluation of the individual contributions of artists is a disturbing trend and the DGA will not stand for it. We intend on taking the strongest possible actions, in solidarity with the WGA, to ensure every artist receives the individual credit they deserve.”
By the end of the day, Warner Bros. Discovery announced that it would modify how credits were listed on the platform in compliance with its preexisting contract agreement with the unions. Yet the strong language indicated that the DGA was ready to play hardball.
Meanwhile, members of SAG-AFTRA have been vocally supportive of the WGA. This is no shock, since on top of the same issue of residuals and wages, the union — which includes, in addition to film and TV actors, people who work in radio, singers, voice actors, influencers, models, and other media professionals — is concerned about the existential threat posed by AI and other technologies. Even before the WGA’s strike began, SAG-AFTRA issued statements regarding how the use of AI could eliminate or greatly reduce work for its members.
Members of SAG-AFTRA have shown up on picket lines to support the writers, and the star power posed by some of its most prominent members helps bring attention to the WGA’s strike. It’s also an effort to remind the studios that when their own negotiations begin, they’re ready for a fight. Underlining that implicit statement, the leadership of SAG-AFTRA unanimously agreed to ask its membership for a strike authorization vote, which concludes this coming Monday, June 5. That’s a move designed to signal solidarity to the AMPTP ahead of negotiations.
Demonstrators at the WGA strike on May 26 in LA. Frederic J. Brown/AFP via Getty Images
It’s clear that all of Hollywood’s unions — not just the three with expiring contracts — are working together to show solidarity. Both IATSE, which represents Hollywood’s “below-the-line” workers (everyone from grips to craft services to first aid to electricians), and the Teamsters (who drive trucks, wrangle animals, manage locations, and a lot more) are authorized by their leadership to refuse to cross picket lines, and have made that choice throughout the writers strike. DGA and SAG members have frequently refused as well.
The DGA’s negotiations are set to end on June 7, the same day SAG-AFTRA’s negotiations begin. Knowing this, on May 31, the leaders of the Teamsters, IATSE, WGA, and SAG-AFTRA issued a joint statement supporting the DGA in their negotiations, declaring that “as eyes around the world again turn towards the negotiation table, we send a clear message to the AMPTP: Our solidarity is not to be underestimated.”
When writers go on strike, some of the industry can still operate, provided their workers are willing to cross picket lines. (Due to available personnel, the WGA also can’t picket every production, and thus chooses strategically.) But if the DGA or SAG-AFTRA walks off the job — or both — then productions will shut down across the board. Hollywood would grind to a halt.
Here’s what’s most significant about all of this: All three unions have never gone on strike at the same time, in the history of Hollywood. The fact that this scenario is possible, even likely, emphasizes how extraordinary this moment is in the entertainment business. Technology has always been a major driver in labor negotiations. But the major companies’ use of streaming services, and their demonstrated interest in cutting out humans through the use of tech, poses an existential threat to everyone who makes the TV, movies, and other scripted entertainment that brings in billions of dollars every year. The question, at this juncture, is whether there’s a future for Hollywood at all — or whether entertainment will be swallowed whole by the tech industry. For Hollywood’s artists and craftspeople, that’s a fate worth fighting against.