Religious Freedom: The Next Mormon Frontier

Promoting Religious Freedom in a Secular Age: Fundamental Principles, Practical Priorities, and Fairness for All
Elder Lance B. Wickman
General Counsel, The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints
2016 Religious Freedom Annual Review, July 7–8, 2016

While emphasizing that religious freedom is a fundamental right of paramount importance, Elder Lance B. Wickman, general counsel for The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, told an audience at BYU that "as citizens of this nation, we have a duty to work with our fellow countrymen to find workable solutions to vexing problems—including clashes of rights and fundamentally competing interests."

Introduction                                                                   
"This is an important conference. We need to meet together with the common purpose of preserving religious freedom and then discuss and debate both first principles and hard practical choices. We need to be better informed. . . "



Link to complete transcript >> http://www.mormonnewsroom.org/article/promoting-religious-freedom-secular-age-fundamental-principles-practical-priorities-fairness-for-all

Mesa Chamber of Commerce Plays Politics > Can Anyone Name That Game??

Blogger Insert: An educational non-profit corporation making political endorsements???
MESA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE NEWS RELEASE
28 July 2016
The Mesa Chamber of Commerce Board of Directors is pleased to announce its endorsements for the 2016 primary election. The Board endorses candidates in the US Senate, AZ Congressional District 5, State Legislature, County Board of Supervisors, and Mesa City Council. The endorsed candidates’ positions on issues most accurately reflect the opinions of the Mesa business community.

Insert > Blogger's Note:

• Find out who's on the Board of Directors here 
• Non-Profit/Educational Registration with AZ Corporation here  dba MESA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE BUSINESS IN EDUCATION FOUNDATION, I
• Link to 2015 Annual Report >> here

The Chamber’s Good Government Committee interviewed or surveyed candidates in contested primary races in late June. The Committee deliberated and made recommendations to the Mesa Chamber Board of Directors.

Renee Castillo

“After an extensive interview process with the Mesa Chamber’s Good Government Committee, we are confident that the candidates who are being endorsed embody the needs of the business community and City of Mesa as a whole,” said Renee Castillo, Chair of the Chamber’s Government Affairs Council and Good Government Committee.

“We appreciate the volunteers from our Good Government Committee and Board members who have a passion for the political process and feel strongly about having pro-business candidates represent the interests of chamber members,” said Sally Harrison, Chamber President & CEO.   “We are pleased that so many people were willing to put in the time to participate ensuring the Chamber’s process would be fair and meaningful."
The Mesa Chamber of Commerce is also appreciative of the participation of the candidates.  Our committee and board members value the opportunity to learn more about candidates and understand their positions, opinions and approaches to the complex problems we face as a community. It’s always difficult to make choices between qualified individuals, and we have made every effort to make our decisions fairly and in a manner that is consistent with the business priorities of the Mesa Chamber of Commerce. 
The following are the endorsements approved by the Mesa Chamber of Commerce Board of Directors.  The Chamber may issue additional endorsements in the upcoming general elections. 

Mesa Chamber of Commerce
40 North Center Street #104
Mesa, AZ 85201www.MesaChamber.org

Contact:

Sally Harrison, President & CEO, Mesa Chamber of Commerce

     

sharrison@mesachamber.org,

Phone: 480.969.1307, ext. 26

 

[Shown in the image to the left from the cover of Compass Mag with Mesa Mayor John Giles and Steve Banta, who was forced to resign as CEO of Valley Metro]

 

 

 

 US Senate
John McCain

Congressional District #5
Andy Biggs

Maricopa County Supervisor District #2
Steve Chucri

Legislative District #18 Senate
Jeff Dial

Legislative District #25 Senate
Bob Worsley

Legislative District #26 Senate
David Lucier

Legislative District #16 House
Doug Coleman
Adam Stevens

Legislative District #25 House
Rusty Bowers
Ross Groen

Legislative District #26 House
Celeste Plumlee

Mesa City Council District #1
Mark Freeman

Mesa City Council District #2
Shelly Allen

Mesa City Council District #3 Jerry Lewis

Here's A Smart Well-Informed Candidate for the Mesa City Council: Jeremy Whittaker

It came as no surprise at all to some residents of Mesa that the Mesa Chamber of Commerce recently endorsed in a press release dated July 27, 2016 three candidates campaigning for election to the Mesa City Council - Jeremy Whittaker was not one of them.
Their action - on behalf of the business community they say they represent - to do this is questionable to say the least.
Your MesaZona blogger is posting excerpts from an article by a candidate [other than the one endorsed for District 3] who expresses his stand on an issue that will decided by voters in the current municipal election.

Voters can decide their choice based on data presented -
Why I do not support the 23% tax increase
Source: http://www.jeremywhittaker.com/direct/23-tax-increase/
The current City Council voted to raise Mesa sales tax by 23%.  This must be approved by voters and will be on the November ballot.  There are primarily three reasons why I do not support raising the Mesa sales tax from 1.75% to 2.15%.  When a government entity whether it be city, county, state, or federal says they want to raise our current tax rate by 23% everyone should be paying attention.  The first reason is a lot more simpler than the other two.  We should not be bundling public safety and education when asking voters to approve a 23% tax increase.  Secondly multiple studies show we are in a higher education bubble.  When this bubble bursts one has to ask if the city of Mesa has built in protections against the higher education occupants of these buildings that we’re all subsidizing with our tax dollars.  The last reason I do not support this 23% tax increase a little more difficult and will take some time to explain.  In summary we have a special interest group buying our city council candidates.  They buy them because they can then use them, once elected, to raise taxes rather than address the insolvent public safety pension system.  This needs to be fixed at a state level.  They buy them because instead of dealing with the reality that they bankrupt the system they would rather raise taxes and force our city into more debt through unfunded liabilities.  I believe we need to face this issue head on.  But we cannot do this without first addressing that the leaders of the system have purchased our council candidates.
I will prefix this by stating that our public safety personnel are critical to a well-functioning city but the problem is their leadership has failed them. Unfortunately, the money is gone and nobody wants to talk about it. As we’ve come too familiar with in politics we just try to patch the issue.  The problem is with the PSPRS (Public Safety Personnel Retirement System) management. We as tax payers in Mesa and every other municipality have already funded the retirement system through taxation. So much so that in the early 2000’s it was almost 130% funded. The pension was gambled away and all of the assets were put at risk. Now to date it is somewhere around 50.13% funded and that is assuming a 7.5% annualized return, which is also not realistic given central banks imposing negative interest rates around the world.  Some estimates have said this system is as much as $49 billion in the red.
We should ask, why are none of the politicians and leaders of PSPRS watching out for the beat cop and firefighter who risk their lives every day to protect us?  Our leadership has bankrupt their pension and if elected I would demand we investigate and file a lawsuit against those who have a fiduciary responsibility to watch out for our public safety workers. These men and women risk their lives every day.  The last thing they should have to worry about is if their pension is going to be there when they’re done serving our community.

In this chart you can see this system used to be fully funded in 2003.  Now in 2015 it’s 48% funded.  This is almost $6.6 billion dollars in the red.

Keep in mind this is assuming the system can return 7.5% a year.  Since 2002 it has barely cracked 5%
This loss of capital by the pension management has created a huge unfunded liability for the city, as the city is on the hook to refund these lost funds. This also becomes apparent when you look at the skyrocketing cost of hiring a new public safety official. This simple chart shows the drastic increase in cost for a public safety worker over the last 10 years. The majority of this is due to the pressure of the pension system in which the funds were gambled away by the leadership.  

I should be clear, this is not the fault of the men and women who defend our city every day.  This is the result of reckless gambling by the leadership of this system. The Arizona State legislature needs to fix this before it is too late.  

Did the state legislature make this problem worse?

As bad as this situation is the state legislature this year passed SB1428 which allows for new public safety workers to opt out of the pension system and into a 401K like program or tier.  This relinquishes their responsibility to support any public safety worker hired prior to 2012. If you are a public safety worker and were hired prior to 2012 you should be paying attention to what this does.  It does not take a highly intelligent person to figure out what happens to a pension system when it’s 49% funded and $6.5 billion in the red and new public safety workers can opt out. The system gets top heavy when older workers retire, then the system collapses. Here is an example of what happened when the city of Mesa got rid of the elected official retirement pension or EORP. It took 2 years but the you can clearly see as the older workers retired the unfunded liability jumped off the charts. Luckily the membership in this system is EORP pension is low. That is not the case with PSPRS which is billions of dollars.  Furthermore it is important to note that the new hires under SB1428 are only responsible for their own tier of unfunded liabilities.  This almost guarantees the system will collapse and municipalities around the state of Arizona will be on the hook for billions of dollars of lost money.  Public safety workers hired prior to 2012 will be hurt the most.  As soon as this system begins to collapse the municipalities will all push back and will have no choice because of the strained budget.  We have got to demand that a full investigation is done to recover the funds that were gambled away.  Our public safety workers deserve better.  They should not be risking their lives every day only to find out their pension will not be there one day.
Should the special interest groups be able to buy city council candidates so they vote to raise our taxes?

To “fix” this issue the current leadership has decided they will buy the City Council and raise taxes by 23%.  This is typical of any politician.  If you can’t fix it let’s just keep taxing people until they can no longer afford to live.  If we do not demand accountability then what stops this reckless investing from bankrupting the system a second time?
This is apparent in the public safety bond which is being proposed in November to raise sales tax 23% from 1.75% today to 2.15% if it passes(more info). What system is allowed to risk billions of dollars of assets and if it is all lost allows for tax payers to keep replenishing it? There is no responsibility and accountability here and PSPRS might as well keep investing in the riskiest of assets.  If they do well they make a great return.  If they don’t the tax payer simply pays for the losses.  This is why the public safety management fundraises and spends thousands of dollars buying city council members every election, this is an example of special interest groups on a local level buying candidates who support raising our taxes for their own special interests.  This is what is wrong with our government today.

You can’t really buy City Council candidates… Can you?

EARTH QUAKE WARNING/EARTH FACING SOLAR ERUPTION

Views:20,705

It's Time Travel, NOT Progress!" - Brutally Honest Jonathan Pie

Yes Yes  my friend, Go for another!

Published on Jul 29, 2016

Views: 169

Jonathan Pie looks at the legacy of the 2012 Olympics - a "£20m helter-skelter" he concludes. He also wonders whether it's more time travel than progress.

Follow-Up to July 27 Post:: Q2 GDP Growth Below Estimates

U.S. second quarter GDP increases at sluggish 1.2% annual rate    

By Greg Robb

Published: July 29, 2016 8:46 a.m. ET

WASHINGTON (MarketWatch) -- The U.S. economy grew at a tepid 1.2% annual rate in the second quarter, held down by a large decline in business investment, the Commerce Department said Friday. The second quarter gain was well below the 2.6% rate economists surveyed by MarketWatch had forecast. Adding to the sense of weakness, first quarter growth was also revised down to a 0.8% annual rate from the prior estimate of a 1.1% gain. Lackluster growth could derail the Federal Reserve's intentions to raise interest rates at a gradual pace. The weaker than expected growth could also make the economy a bigger issue in the presidential election campaign.

Source: http://www.marketwatch.com/story/us-second-quarter-gdp-increases-at-sluggish-12-annual-rate-2016-07-29?mod=BreakingNewsMain&link=sfmw_tw

 

Why would the US have a strong GDP when all partnering countries are struggling? HELLO??? The US economists must believe they are living on a huge island, oblivious to what is really happening around world !!

 

Infographic below from http://www.tradingeconomics.com/united-states/gdp-growth-annual/forecast

 

 

Arizona Mexico Transnational Initiative Moves Forward

Meetings kicking off I-11 corridor study draw big turnout Hundreds provide input on Nogales-to-Wickenburg corridor

PHOENIX – The numbers speak volumes about Arizona’s interest in the proposed Interstate 11: Six public meetings held recently attracted 540 community members who shared comments and questions. Hundreds more offered their perspectives online.
The Arizona Department of Transportation’s Interstate 11 study team visited Casa Grande, Buckeye, Nogales, Tucson, Marana and Wickenburg to involve the community in a process known as public scoping, part of an environmental study to select a corridor alternative between Nogales and Wickenburg.

That had ADOT representatives answering questions, receiving feedback, and encouraging attendees to mark suggestions and concerns on maps of the 280-mile-long corridor study area.
“We’re excited about the high level of interest and engagement that we’ve seen,” ADOT Director John Halikowski said. “The great turnout and the opportunity for the public to tell us what’s important to them are critical to this process.”
No specific routes for I-11 have been chosen or favored at this early stage in the process. ADOT’s goal is having a selected corridor alternative in place at the end of the environmental study. A no-build alternative will be considered as well.
The next formal public involvement opportunity will begin early next year, when the study team will present possible routes for I-11.
In addition to those who attended the June meetings, 125 people submitted comment forms or surveys and 522 people completed an online survey during a 45-day comment period.
The study team, which also held scoping meetings in Phoenix, Casa Grande and Tucson with representatives of 21 federal, state and local agencies, will now analyze the feedback.
Anyone interested in sharing their views about the study can do so at any time throughout the study process. Information and materials, including a map of the corridor study area, are available at i11study.com/Arizona.
Comments can be provided via mail, email and voicemail:

• Email: I-11ADOTStudy@hdrinc.com
• Toll-free bilingual telephone hotline: 1-844-544-8049
• Mail:

Interstate 11 Tier 1 EIS Study Teamc/o ADOT Communications1655 W. Jackson St., Mail Drop 126FPhoenix, AZ 85007
 
Read more at: azdot.gov/media/News