Thursday, May 04, 2017

Totals Spent on Lobbying 1998-2017

Lobbying Database
 In addition to campaign contributions to elected officials and candidates, companies, labor unions, and other organizations spend billions of dollars each year to lobby Congress and federal agencies. Some special interests retain lobbying firms, many of them located along Washington's legendary K Street; others have lobbyists working in-house.
We've got totals spent on lobbying, beginning in 1998, for everyone from AAI Corp. to Zurich Financial. (See also: Foreign Lobby Watch.)
Total Lobbying Spending
1998$1,452,784,975$1.45 Billion
1999$1,443,020,766$1.44 Billion
2000$1,566,634,739$1.57 Billion
2001$1,633,369,655$1.63 Billion
2002$1,832,177,993$1.83 Billion
2003$2,061,307,915$2.06 Billion
2004$2,185,086,481$2.19 Billion
2005$2,440,823,167$2.44 Billion
2006$2,634,587,325$2.63 Billion
2007$2,875,379,855$2.88 Billion
2008$3,312,295,001$3.31 Billion
2009$3,506,861,240$3.51 Billion
2010$3,516,253,989$3.52 Billion
2011$3,325,639,422$3.33 Billion
2012$3,305,392,059$3.31 Billion
2013$3,240,954,007$3.24 Billion
2014$3,259,839,480$3.26 Billion
2015$3,225,346,396$3.23 Billion
2016$3,147,612,701$3.15 Billion
2017$840,873,063$0.84 Billion
Number of Lobbyists*
1998$10,40410,404
1999$12,92512,925
2000$12,54012,540
2001$11,82611,826
2002$12,11812,118
2003$12,91712,917
2004$13,16413,164
2005$14,07214,072
2006$14,47614,476
2007$14,82114,821
2008$14,14914,149
2009$13,73813,738
2010$12,92612,926
2011$12,61812,618
2012$12,17812,178
2013$12,10912,109
2014$11,81011,810
2015$11,51211,512
2016$11,18611,186
2017$9,1909,190
NOTE: Figures are on this page are calculations by the Center for Responsive Politics based on data from the Senate Office of Public Records.
Data for the most recent year was downloaded on April 24, 2017.
*The number of unique, registered lobbyists who have actively lobbied.
Feel free to distribute or cite this material, but please credit the Center for Responsive Politics.
For permission to reprint for commercial uses, such as textbooks, contact the Center: info@crp.org
 
Recent Registrations
ClientHWD Holdings LLC05/01/2017
RegistrantBALLARD PARTNERSView Report
Issue The registrant will advise and advocate for the client on general government policies
ClientNT Concepts, Inc.05/01/2017
RegistrantCovington & Burling LLPView Report
Issue Backlog in Federal security clearance background investigations
ClientSeqirus, Inc.04/28/2017
RegistrantBAKER DONELSON BEARMAN CALDWELL & BERKOWITZView Report
Issue FY17 & FY18 Labor, Health and Human Services and Education Appropriations Bills
ClientSwedishAmerican Health System04/28/2017
RegistrantBarnes & Thornburg, LLPView Report
Issue Assist client with communications particularly with members of the Illinois Congressional
ClientThe Mohegan Tribe04/28/2017
RegistrantBarnes & Thornburg, LLPView Report
Issue Assist client with general issues affecting Native American tribes.
 
 

Lobbying

Big tobacco in 2017: Full steam ahead

May 3, 2017 | This week, the Justice Department moved to delay enforcement of rules the FDA finalized a year ago dealing with tobacco products like e-cigarettes, cigars and hookah tobacco. It’s been a busy time for big tobacco, as the victory came on the heels of a defeat for vaping (e-cigarette) companies: Sunday night’s omnibus budget bill reportedly did…

Where are they now? Lucrative lobbying gigs, other jobs landed by newly-former lawmakers

May 1, 2017 | “I think that American people should know that the members of Congress are underpaid,” said Rep. Jim Moran (D-Va.) in April 2014, having recently announced his retirement from the House. To be fair, he was discussing the results of an annual House vote on adjusting lawmaker pay: Each year, Congress can give itself a raise to keep…

Fewer lobbyists, more money: What’s going on?

April 24, 2017 | Before President Trump was sworn in, his rhetoric and treatment of lobbyists seemed pretty harsh. He announced lobbyists would be kicked off the transition team and registered lobbyists couldn’t work in his administration, and some lobbyists deregistered to stand a chance to serve. Then things turned, and Trump was soon letting former lobbyists serve on his…

Good News For Green Growth

Capital for buying, upgrading legal Cannabis business property increases
Posted by   /  May 3, 2017  /
Most of the money goes to buying or upgrading indoor and outdoor farms and stores, survey says
By Peter Grant | The Wall Street Journal
More capital is flowing into the purchasing and upgrade of property tied to fledgling cannabis businesses in states where it has been legalized, according to statistics from Viridian Capital Advisors, an investment bank that specializes in the pot trade.


Last year businesses that focused on growing or dispensing marijuana raised about $475 million, according to the Viridian Cannabis Deal Tracker. This year the figure has already hit $225 million, the firm said.
This year-to-date is even better:




Forbes did a better job reporting - and it's not done behind a pay-wall
Source: click right here
Forbes Covers the Viridian Cannabis Deal Tracker
 New York, NY - January 3, 2017 (Investorideas.com Newswire) Forbes, a leading media company reporting on finance, industry, and investing, recently covered the Viridian Cannabis Deal Tracker in an article entitled, "Marijuana Industry Raises Over $1 Billion in 2016."
In an interview with Scott Greiper, the president and founder of Viridian Capital Advisors, the article details various trends in the cannabis capital markets, including a comparison of the Canadian and U.S. markets, the largest transactions closed YTD, the momentum in cannabis deal flow surrounding the recent U.S. November elections, as well as sentiment in the cannabis industry regarding President-elect Donald Trump and the tapping of Jeff Sessions for U.S. Attorney General.
Click the image below to read the article in its entirety:
The information contained herein is for informational purposes and should not be construed as Viridian recommending investment in cannabis companies or as a solicitation to buy or sell any security or engage in a particular investment strategy. Investment in cannabis companies entails substantial risk, before acting on any information, you should consider whether it is suitable for your particular circumstances and consult all available material, and if necessary, seek professional advice.
 

Agendas: Special + Regular Mesa City Council Study SessionMeetings Thu 04 May 2017

Important items at both of these:
Superstition Freeway East Economic Activity
Wrap-up of the FY 2017/18 budget.  ???
Community Services Department budget.
Executive Session
Issuance and sale of utility systems revenue bonds
Issuance and sale of general obligation bonds


Here's a YouTube video of information regarding the sale and issuance of the utility system and general obligation bonds with rates charged for financing at 3.56%


Mesa City Council Study Session Thu 04 May 2017 @ 07:30 a.m.
Meeting Agenda - Final

Mayor John Giles
Vice Mayor David Luna - District 5
Councilmember Mark Freeman - District 1
Councilmember Jeremy Whittaker - District 2
Councilmember Ryan Winkle - District 3
Councilmember Chris Glover - District 4 Councilmember
Kevin Thompson - District 6
Any citizen wishing to speak on an agenda item should complete and turn in a blue card to the City Clerk before that item is presented.


Roll Call
(Members of the Mesa City Council will attend either in person or by telephone conference call)

1 Review items on the agenda for the May 8, 2017 regular Council meeting.

2 Presentations/Action Items:
  • 17-0529 Hear a presentation, discuss and provide direction on the General Plan as it relates to the Superstition Freeway East Economic Activity Area. 2-a
  • 17-0289 Hear a presentation, discuss and provide direction on a summary wrap-up of the FY 2017/18 budget. 2-b
  • 17-0525 Hear a presentation, discuss and provide direction on the Community Services Department budget. 2-c

3 Approval of minutes from an Executive Session held on April 6, 2017

4. 17-0539 Information pertaining to the current Job Order Contracting projects

5 Hear reports on meetings and/or conferences attended

6 Scheduling of meetings and general information

7 Convene an Executive Session.
   ES-013-17

  • Discussion or consultation for legal advice with the City Attorney. (A.R.S. § 38-431.03A (3)) 
  • Discussion or consultation with the designated representatives of the City in order to consider the City’s position and instruct the City’s representative regarding negotiations with employee organizations regarding the salaries, salary schedules or compensation paid in the form of fringe benefits of employees of the City. (A.R.S. §38-431.03A(5)) 
  • Discussion or consultation with the City Attorney in order to consider the City's position and instruct the City Attorney regarding the City's position regarding contracts that are the subject of negotiations. (A.R.S. §38-431.03A(4))
1.  Meet and Confer policy and process, and Police and Fire Memoranda of Understanding
7-a
 
8 Adjournment.
__________________________________________________________________________________________
 
Special Council Meeting
HERE'S A YOUTUBE VID OF THIS

 
Any citizen wishing to speak on an agenda item should complete and turn in a blue card to the City Clerk before that item is presented.
Roll Call (Members of the Mesa City Council will attend either in person or by telephone conference call)

1 Take action on the following resolutions: Links to all documents are below
  • 17-0368 Adopting a resolution authorizing the issuance and sale of utility systems revenue bonds of the City of Mesa, Maricopa County, Arizona. 1-a
  • 17-0369 Adopting a resolution authorizing the issuance and sale of general obligation bonds of the City of Mesa, Maricopa County, Arizona. 1-b

2 Adjournment.

________________________________________________________________________

LINKS
17-0368
On agenda: 5/4/2017
Title: Adopting a resolution authorizing the issuance and sale of utility systems revenue bonds of the City of Mesa, Maricopa County, Arizona.
Attachments: 1. Council Memo, 2. RES - Mesa Utility Rev 2017- 34th Supplemental Resolution, 3. AGR - Mesa Utility Rev. Bonds Sr 2017- Registrar Contract, 4. City of Mesa_Utility Systems Bonds Series 2017_DRAFT POS 4-18-2017, 5. CER - Mesa Utility Sytems Rev Bonds Sr 2017- Continuing disclosure certificate
 
17-0369
On agenda: 5/4/2017
Title: Adopting a resolution authorizing the issuance and sale of general obligation bonds of the City of Mesa, Maricopa County, Arizona.
Attachments: 1. Council Memo, 2. RES - Mesa GO 2017- Resolution authorizing issuance and sale, 3. City of Mesa_General Obligation Bonds Series 2017 (NEW $)_DRAFT POS 4-18..., 4. AGR - Mesa GO Bonds Sr 2017- Registrar Contract, 5. CER - Mesa GO Bonds Sr 2017- Continuing disclosure certificate

Get Active: Mesa City Council Meetings May 2017

City Council Meetings
Link: http://mesaaz.gov/city-hall/advisory-boards-committees/city-council
Note:  Because of the Open Meeting Law, the Council cannot take action on any item brought up by a citizen at the meeting, but may refer items for further study/follow-up.
Agendas and Minutes can be found >> Council. Board and Committee Research Center

As part of each meeting agenda, action may be taken on:
  • Zoning matters,
  • Job Order Contracts, awarding of contracts to purchase equipment, supplies or for construction improvements within the City,
  • Liquor license applications,
  • Ordinances
  • Resolutions.
Minutes of past City Council meetings are posted at this site after they are approved by the City Council. The preliminary agenda of the next council meeting is posted at this site approximately four days before a council meeting and the final agenda, which incorporates any last minute changes to the preliminary agenda, usually is posted at this site the morning of the council meeting.
For copies of Council Minutes that are not listed, call the City Clerk's Office (480) 644-2381.
Speaking at a Meeting
The Mesa City Council believes that providing access for citizens to communicate with the Council is vital for a strong representative local government.  The following are methods in which to express your opinion at various Council meetings.
Agenda Items
At regular Monday Council meetings, blue Speaker/Comment cards are available for citizens who wish to comment on agenda items.
Please note items listed on the agenda with an asterisk are part of the consent agenda. Items on the consent agendas will be adopted with one motion and vote if no citizen or Councilmember requests that it be removed from the consent agenda for separate consideration.
If you wish to speak on a consent agenda item, you must submit your request to speak before the vote on the consent agenda.  Speakers are limited to three minutes each.
Items from Citizens Present
Citizens are provided an opportunity to address the Council on any issue under an agenda item titled "Items from Citizens Present." 
This item appears on the agenda of every regular Monday Council meeting and Thursday Study Session.  Blue Speaker/Comment cards are available for those who wish to comment

Special City Council Meeting
05/04/2017 7:30 AM - 7:35 AM
  • City Council Study Session
    05/04/2017 7:30 AM - 9:00 AM
  • Economic Development Committee Meeting
    05/08/2017 4:00 PM - 5:00 PM
  • City Council Study Session
    05/08/2017 5:15 PM - 5:45 PM
  • City Council Meeting
    05/08/2017 5:45 PM - 7:00 PM
  • City Council Study Session
    05/11/2017 7:30 AM - 9:00 AM
  • City Council Study Session
    05/18/2017 7:30 AM - 9:00 AM
  • City Council Meeting
    05/22/2017 5:45 PM - 7:00 PM
  • City Council Study Session
    05/25/2017 7:30 AM - 9:00 AM

  •  

     
     

    TAKE A LOOK >> Metro Phoenix Global Investment Plan

    Greater Phoenix releases new global trade and investment strategy to maximize region’s global potentialPHOENIX (February 15, 2017) The Greater Phoenix Economic Council announced the release of the Metro Phoenix Global Investment Plan, a comprehensive global trade and investment plan that outlines specific steps local business, civic and government leaders can take to leverage exports and foreign direct investment to grow global engagement.
    This strategy is an integral stage of the Greater Phoenix region’s participation in the Global Cities Initiative, a joint project of the Brookings Institution and JPMorgan Chase & Co.
     
    The final plan integrates lessons learned from previous GCI endeavors including an initial market assessment followed by export and foreign direct investment strategies.
    With more than 85 percent of global growth through 2019 projected to occur outside the United States, global engagement is a necessity if cities want to catalyze both their economies and their workforce.
    Global companies—those that export and receive foreign direct investment—pay higher average wages, contribute more to regional research and development efforts, and increase productivity of domestic markets through the infusion of new technologies and practices.
    “Leaders across the Greater Phoenix region have committed to take tangible action on what our research shows is key to a strong, diverse economy,” said Marek Gootman, fellow and director of strategic partnerships and global initiatives at the Brookings Institution. “Through this planning process, Greater Phoenix will determine how to better help local firms and the region take advantage of opportunities in the global marketplace. Greater Phoenix joins a select group of metro areas working to strengthen their international connections and competitiveness through the Global Cities Initiative, where executing regional trade and investment strategies is yielding measurable results.”
    The Metro Phoenix Global Investment Plan was released today at an event held in partnership with the MEMS and Sensors Industry Group at ASU SkySong, featuring remarks from:
    • Curtis Reed Jr., Region Manager for the Arizona Middle Market, JPMorgan Chase
    • Chris Camacho, President & CEO, Greater Phoenix Economic Council 
    • Sethuraman Panchanathan, Executive Vice President, ASU Knowledge Enterprise and Chief Research and Innovation Officer, Arizona State University
    • Chet Hullum, General Manager of Industrial Solutions, Internet of Things Group, Intel Corporation
    • Randal Schulhauser, Business Development and Market Insights Leader, Medtronic
    • Wayne Chavez, IoT Sensors – Business Development Manager, NXP
    • Stephen Whalley, Intel and the MEMS and Sensors Industry Group
    “The report’s findings suggest that for Greater Phoenix, the opportunity lies in understanding where the region’s legacy sectors are evolving and specializing in their emerging technologies, particularly in the internet of things and sensors industries,” said Chris Camacho, president and CEO, Greater Phoenix Economic Council. “By capitalizing on the region’s existing supply chain, talented workforce and robust research capabilities, Greater Phoenix has the opportunity to develop a meaningful, recognized global industry identity.”
     
    Key findings from the Metro Phoenix Global Investment Plan include:
    • The impending internet of things revolution is creating new international investment opportunities for the region;
    • Greater Phoenix is well positioned to capitalize on the evolution and growth of sensor application industries;
    • Foreign entry through mergers and acquisitions will continue to grow over the next five to 10 years;
    • Canada and Mexico are essential partners for both trade relations and long-term investment opportunities
    • Europe and Asia are essential for near-term FDI strategy.
    “International trade and inward investment represents a promising pathway for local businesses to create jobs, attract capital and grow our economy,” said Curtis Reed Jr., Region Manager for Chase’s Middle Market banking in Arizona. “JPMorgan Chase is proud to be a part of the development of Greater Phoenix’s export plan and to support innovative planning that will lead to our region’s future economic success.” 
     
    For more findings and information on Greater Phoenix’s global trade and investment plan, please visit www.gpec.org/research-reports. 
    ###
    About the Global Cities Initiative (GCI)
    The Global Cities Initiative is a joint-project of the Brookings Institution and JPMorgan Chase designed to help metropolitan leaders advance and grow their regional economies by strengthening international connections and competitiveness on key economic indicators. GCI activities include producing data and research to guide decisions, fostering practice and policy innovations, and facilitating a peer-learning network through replication and dissemination. For more information, see www.brookings.edu/project/global-cities or www.jpmorganchase.com/globalcities.
    About the Greater Phoenix Economic Council (GPEC)
    A true public-private partnership, GPEC is the regional economic development organization for Greater Phoenix. Working with its 23 member communities, Maricopa County and more than 170 private investors, GPEC attracts quality businesses to this dynamic region. By creating a high-performance economy through capital investments and jobs, Greater Phoenix companies enjoy a business climate where they can compete and thrive in today’s global economy. Since 1989, GPEC has worked to achieve an economically sound and sustainable region. For more information, visit www.gpec.org and follow us at twitter.com/gpec.
    CONTACT:
    Michelle Kauk, 602-262-8602, mkauk@gpec.org
    Anthony Fiano, 202-238-3113, afiano@brookings.edu

    Not-So-Fast + Not-So-Slick: JonTalton Taunts GPEC Spin on PHX Silicon Desert

    Not disappointed at all to see and read another counter-punch from journalism colleague who publishes The Rogue Columnist . Here's another REALITY CHECK
    Great expectations
    03 May 2017

    The local media have paid much attention to a nascent technology cluster in downtown Phoenix.
    Most recently came an Arizona Republic story
    headlined, "What's Driving a Downtown Phoenix Tech Boom." It reads in part:
    A San Francisco tech company that announced an expansion from Silicon Valley to downtown Phoenix last week cited a lively business climate and a light-rail stop as primary factors in choosing the city.
    Representatives of a semiconductor packaging company moving its corporate headquarters in May from California to south of Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport said the city is cost-effective and has the workforce they need. These recent examples are part of what Phoenix leaders say is a flood of tech industry leaders and startups looking to open in the city. Mayor Greg Stanton highlighted the growth in his State of the City speech on April 25.
    Stanton said the number of tech companies downtown has nearly quadrupled in the past five years. He credited adaptive reuse projects in the Warehouse District and new tech hubs as a source of the success.
    Good for Phoenix.
    I hate to be the one who suns on the parade, but a reality check is necessary.
    For one thing, the top of the story lacks that basic of journalism, "How big is big"?
    As in, a quadrupling of companies from a baseline of one leaves us with not too many firms.
    Also, what is "tech"?
    When metropolitan Phoenix gets credit for technology jobs, they usually turn out to be call centers or back-office operations. Most pay poorly.
    By contrast, Seattle's tech jobs are actually undercounted because the tens of thousands of well-paid Amazon headquarters positions are classified under retail by statisticians.
    Further down, we read more specifics:
    Since 2012, the number of tech companies in the roughly 4-mile stretch (in the central core) grew from 67 to about 260, said Joseph MacEwan, research assistant for the Community and Economic Development Department....Over the same time period, technology jobs in that area increased from about 1,800 to more than 7,000." (According to the Census, the city had 124,000 firms in 2012 — this context from me).
    That sounds impressive, and maybe it is. But this counts firms with five or more employees, so many of these are very small and I go back to what is "tech."


    The Greater Phoenix Economic Council claims that 66,000 are "qualified software workers" employed by "the information and communications technology sector." This is across the entire metro area and no doubt sweeps in many call center and back-office jobs.
    It's not a classification used in basic U.S. Labor Department counts.
    So we're back to "How big is big?"
    For example, the invaluable database of the St. Louis Fed has no software publishing category for metro Phoenix. They total more than 58,000 in Seattle and 7,000 in Denver.
    Indeed, there are no "all employees information" data categories for Phoenix at all.
    Computer and electronic manufacturing jobs — none, as far as I know, in downtown — totaled 27,400 for the metro area in March, down from a peak of more than 56,000 in 1998 and continuing a downward trajectory.
    Beyond the numbers, a "tech boom" requires abundant venture capital.
    Phoenix has badly lagged its peers in this category for many years.
    And this ties into a chain of funding needed for startups to succeed, beginning with angel capital, as well as the expertise that the best VCs bring.
    Phoenix needs a world-class university computer science institution. ASU claims its program ranked 31st nationally, but that's not world class nor is it in downtown Phoenix.
    Attracting and retaining top young talent remains one of the metro's biggest difficulties.
    For example
    • A recent study ranked metro Phoenix 60th in adults older than 25 with bachelor's degrees of higher
    • (Peers: Austin ranked 9th, Seattle 10th, Denver 17th).
    • Only 26.7 percent had BA degrees or higher in 2015, below even the national average.
    Here, Phoenix is especially held back by the state's intolerance and reactionary politics and legislation, as well as the lack of the kind of authentic downtown that attracts talent.
    (Pro tip: Championship golf and sunshine aren't enough).

    The top performing metros are at the headwaters of innovation and advanced industries, where the top executives and most talented people work.
    For example, Seattle benefits from the headquarters of Amazon and, in suburban Redmond, Microsoft, as well as a huge cluster of startups and other tech firms such as F5 (this company just signed a lease for all of a new downtown skyscraper). These attract talent and capital from around the world. The University of Washington provides a pipeline of engineers and coders from a top, well-endowed computer-science program. The South Lake Union innovation district adjacent to a vibrant downtown is a huge asset.
    • There is constructive news, especially the old buildings being rehabbed and the support from City Hall.
    • Downtown has the spec developers and leasing agents against it, steering companies to the suburbs.
    Why not have downtown open marketing offices in LA, the Bay Area, and Shanghai?
    GPEC is not downtown's friend.
    Neither is Phoenix's balkanization of city council districts.
    Downtown should be the easiest place in the city to start a business, with speedy permitting, incentives, etc.
    Also, emphasize livability: downtown needs plenty of shade trees and grass.
    And look for best practices in successful cities and apply them where possible.
    Another need; more international flights including to China  

    I'll repeat the same plea I've been making for more than a decade:
    Leverage TGen and the downtown biosciences campus.
    The "meds-and-eds" strategy is viable, but Phoenix is far behind where it should be (see, for example, the Mission Bay Campus of UCSF). The campus needs a hospital and private phrama firms. Surrounding areas could be great sites for biomedical manufacturing.
    I write this not to bring you down, but it's critical to know the competitive landscape. Play in the Big Leagues — Phoenix already is, it just doesn't act like it.

    New Poll: Arizona Border Wall

    Poll: Nearly two-thirds of Arizona voters do not want US-Mexico border wall
    By | May 4, 2017 @

    The border wall enjoyed more support among respondents who were 45 or older and lived in either Maricopa County or rural Arizona.
    Only 28 percent of Pima County voters said they support the wall.
    “People closer to the borderlands have more opposition to it given that they’ve seen the effects of what’s there already along the southern border,” Grijalva said.
    The KTAR News/OHPI poll was conducted on May 1 by OH Predictive Insights — an Arizona-based polling company — in partnership with KTAR News 92.3 FM.
    Survey Methodology
    This live and automated caller survey was conducted on May 1 from an active Arizona registered voter sample. The sample size was 401 completed surveys, with a MoE of +/-4.89 percent. Of the surveys, 35 percent were conducted on cell phones and 65 percent via landlines. The party affiliation, geographic, gender and age demographics accurately reflect active registered voters in Arizona in this sample.
    KTAR’s Paul Ihander and the Associated Press contributed to this report.
     

    Zelensky Calls for a European Army as He Slams EU Leaders’ Response

          Jan 23, 2026 During the EU Summit yesterday, the EU leaders ...