Wednesday, April 10, 2019

MDHI ("a small business") Here In Mesa Has A Hurdle In Contract Award For Future Attack Reconnaissance Aircraft


The Army Futures Command's decision regarding development of the Future Attack Reconnaissance Aircraft. According to GAO's decision published Thursday , the service decided to not award the company, a small business in Mesa, AZ, an other transaction agreement to develop FARA competitive prototypes. 
It is not clear if the US Army’s decision and the GAO’s protest denial knocks the helicopter maker completely out of the FARA competition, though it is certainly a setback 

GAO rejects MD Helicopters' protest of FARA loss
By Ashley Tressel   | April 5, 2019 at 5:25 PM
"The Government Accountability Office has rejected a protest from MD Helicopters of Army Futures Command's decision regarding development of the Future Attack Reconnaissance Aircraft. According to GAO's decision published Thursday , the service decided to not award the company, a small business in Mesa, AZ, an other transaction agreement to develop FARA competitive prototypes. “MD Helicopters argues that the Army unreasonably evaluated its proposal, and otherwise failed to reasonably promote small business participation in accordance with 10 U.S.C. § 2371b(d)(1), . . "
Source: INSIDE DEFENSE 
Inside Defense, from the award-winning Inside the Pentagon family of newsletters, is the nation's best online news service for defense and aerospace professionals. They specialize in exclusive, hard-hitting news on Defense Department programs, procurement and policymaking.
_________________________________________________________________________________
A more complete report from Flight Global
GAO deals blow to MD Helicopters’ FARA prototype bid
08 April 2019
"The Government Accountability Office (GAO) denied a MD Helicopters protest of the decision by the US Army Future Command to not contract with the company to develop a Future Attack Reconnaissance Aircraft (FARA) competitive prototype.
MD Helicopters had protested that the US Army did not grant it an Other Transaction Agreement (OTA), claiming that the service “unreasonably evaluated its proposal, and otherwise failed to reasonably promote small business participation.”
The GAO declined to review the protest because it says as a matter of policy it does not review the award of non-procurement instruments, such as prototype contracts, issued under an agency’s OTA authority.
The US Army formally solicited FARA proposals from the aviation industry in October 2018. The aircraft the service seeking is comparable in size to Future Vertical Lift Capability Set 1, a light-attack and scouting aircraft with a minimum internal payload of six passengers.
The US Army had said in its notice that it anticipated in FY2019 making four to six initial awards based on proposed conceptual designs and approaches. . .
MD Helicopters announced in March 2019 that it was developing a wing-equipped variant of its tail rotorless, twin-engined MD902 Explorer – called Swift – to help it meet the speed requirements of the FARA programme.
As a first step, the company was aiming to gain Federal Aviation Administration type certification for the Genesys Aerosystems glass cockpit in the militarised MD902 variant - the MD969 Combat Explorer - by the end of 2019.
The company wanted to have a prototype Swift built by the end of the year, with ground and flight testing to begin quickly in the months after.
It is not clear if the US Army’s decision and the GAO’s protest denial knocks the helicopter maker completely out of the FARA competition, though it is certainly a setback.
MD Helicopters did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
_________________________________________________________________________________
RELATED CONTENT:
Here's What's In The Army's Requirements For A Future High-Speed Assault Helicopter
The goal is to replace the Army's Black Hawks and some Marine helos, but the new design might ultimately replace a number of other helicopters too.
"The U.S. Army has revealed new details about what it wants from its high-speed, long-range replacement for the UH-60 Black Hawk series of helicopters. The service’s goal is to have the first examples of this future assault rotorcraft in service by 2030, with additional variants for U.S. Special Operations Command and the U.S. Marine Corps following soon thereafter.
_________________________________________________________________________
The Army isn’t planning to issue a contract to buy these new rotorcraft until 2021, but it does want responses to its request for information by this time next week. So we may not have to wait too long to begin getting more information on the possible contenders for the service’s future Black Hawk replacement, which might also supplant a number of other helicopters in service across the U.S. military and with American allies and partners abroad.
_________________________________________________________________________
The Army’s Program Executive Office for Aviation issued a request for information regarding what the service formally calls the Future Long Range Assault Aircraft (FLRAA) on Apr. 4, 2019. FLRAA is part of the over-arching Future Vertical Lift (FVL) program, through which the service hopes to replace all of its existing helicopters.
The final design needs to be able to accommodate 12 passengers in crash-resistant seats, up to 4,000 pounds or cargo, or some combination of both. It will also have an external cargo hook able to lug around at least 10,000 pounds and hopefully up to 13,100 pounds.
The Army needs the FLRAA to be able to operate in so-called “hot-and-high” environments. The rotorcraft has to retain at least 95 percent of normal power to the rotors even at altitudes up to 6,000 feet and in temperatures of up to 95 degrees Fahrenheit, while carrying 12 passengers and enough fuel for a combat radius of 120 nautical miles, and perform a 500 feet-per-minute climb out of the landing zone. If possible, the service wants the design to lose no power at all under these conditions.
You can see the Army's full threshold and objective requirements by clicking on the source
_________________________________________________________________________
 
Air Platforms
MDHI reveals new MD 969 Combat Explorer helo
"The MD 969, which was showcased at the HAI HELI-EXPO event in Atlanta, Georgia, on 5 March, shares the same basic outer mould line as its civilian stablemate and retains the no-tailrotor (NOTAR) configuration of the baseline helicopter.
Where the MD 969 differs most from the MD 902 is in the provision of four munitions hardpoints mounted on an integrated weapons plank. The helicopter at HELI-EXPO was displayed carrying a mix of rocket pods and 12.7 mm heavy machine gun pods, while a promotional video released by MDHI showed it fitted with AGM-114 Hellfire air-to-surface missiles and 7.62 mm door-mounted Gatling-guns.
Other features include a composite fuselage and a digital 'glass' cockpit with three Genesys Aerosystems integrated IDU-680 multi-functional displays (MFDs) and one Macro-Blue tactical display, while the 173 cubic feet cabin volume allows for the carriage of up to six combat troops.
Speaking at the event, MDHI CEO Lynn Tilton reportedly said that the company is pitching the MD 969 at the US Army's upcoming Future Attack Reconnaissance Aircraft (FARA) requirement, which is part of the service's wider Future Vertical Lift (FVL) programme.
As such, it will be powered by the Improved Turbine Engine Programme (ITEP) powerplant (selected as the General Electric T901-GE-900 in February, but currently subject to a protest from rival bidder Advanced Turbine Engine Company [ATEC]) that will be fitted to the FARA helicopter, as well as the US Army's current fleet of Sikorsky UH-60 Black Hawk and Boeing AH-64E Apache Guardian helicopters.
"My personal focus this year is bringing this 969 to the marketplace. This will be a lethal machine, filling the missing space we have in the attack market," Tilton said.
Want to read more?
Jane's 360
For analysis on this article and access to all our insight content, please enquire about our subscription options at ihsmarkit.com/janes 
__________________________________________________________________________________
Army Futures Command
Official website for the Army Futures Command located in Austin, Texas and dedicated to modernizing the US Army using innovative solutions

Monday, April 08, 2019

Jammed-Up Tenative Agenda For Mesa City Council Meeting 15 Jan 2019

Pardon your MesaZona blogger for the muffled screams when there's a 17-page agenda made public and printed 04.04.2019 for this public hearing that skips over what's on two meeting details "not yet available" for two study sessions ahead of time.
One of April 11th and another study session on the schedule just before the regular City Council meeting the same day.
Plenty of time for the dis-engaged public here to study any or all of the 66 items in the meeting's long list of details.
Who knows how-to-study these or even cares?
Here's a link farther down to the hard work ahead:
Where to start? Take a look at all it!
Aside from the mayor, there are six Mesa City members who earn their salaries representing the interests of their constituents - the people who live in  their districts.
Each councilmember has a paid staff assistant that does work assigned to them by each councilmember. Please ask your councilmember to assign tasks to their assistants for information you need to get informed and to study these issues and items that will either get individual attention, or none at all unless you ask. Otherwise they'll just slide-by you before you know it
_________________________________________________________________________
You might want to skip over 5 Liquor License Applications in Item 3 and get right into [count them up]
Item 4 CONTRACTS. There are 22 in that Item and + 3 more huge contracts in Item 5.
Then a slew of RESOLUTIONS - 25 in Item 6
Then more RESOLUTIONS [don't snooze at this point] added to and running on from
Item 6-z to 6-aa, 6-ab, 6-ac and 6-ad
Then ORDINANCES:
4 in Item 7
2 in Item 8
________________________________________________________________________________
Meeting Name: City Council Agenda status: Tentative
Meeting date/time: 4/15/2019 5:45 PM                                                                    
Meeting location: Council Chambers - Upper Level
Published agenda: Agenda Agenda
_________________________________________________________________________
WHERE TO FOCUS: If your choice of time is limited
Item 7 Ordinances:
District 4: one 0.9-acre commercial development
District 5: one 10.43-acre multi-residence development
District 6: four developments on a total of 493.5 acres

Item 4 Contracts: 17 Citywide:


Item 5 Contracts: 1 of 3
ITEM 5-a
File #: 19-0454   

Type: Resolution Status: Agenda Ready


In control: City Council
On agenda: 4/15/2019

Title: Approving an increase in the maximum dollar amount for individual job orders under Job Order Master Contracts for the following construction services: general, landscape, utility, water and wastewater, gas line, and transportation, from $1,000,000 to $1,500,000 per job order, and authorize the City Manager to approve future job orders under the Job Order Master Contracts. (Citywide) The City’s current Job Order Master Contracts that will be affected are with the following: CORE Construction, Inc. and SDB Contracting Services (general); Valley Rain Construction Corporation and Earthscapes, Inc. (landscape); Talis Construction Corporation and B&F Contracting, Inc. (utility); Garney Companies, Inc. and PCL Construction, Inc. (water and wastewater); RP Companies, Inc. (gas line); and Talis Construction Corporation and Nesbitt Contracting Company, Inc. (transportation).
Attachments: 1. Council Report, 2. Resolution
_________________________________________________________________________
Item 5 Contracts: 1 of 3
ITEM 5-c
File #: 19-0430   

Type: Contract Status: Agenda Ready


In control: City Council
On agenda: 4/15/2019

Title: One-Year Term Contract with Two Years of Renewal Options for Five Master Job Order Contracts; three contracts for the General Utility Construction Services and two contracts for Specialty Utility Construction Services. (Citywide) Job Order Master Contracts for general utility construction services will be utilized for projects that are larger in scale, higher in cost, and require more detailed design. The specialty utility construction services will be used for projects that are smaller in scope, are repetitive in nature, and require limited, or no design. Staff recommends the selections of Talis Construction Corporation; Garney Companies, Inc.; and Hunter Contracting Company for general utility construction services. These contracts will be limited to $1,500,000 per job order; a total contract value not-to-exceed $10,000,000 for each year of the contract, per contractor. Staff recommends the selections of Hunter Contracting Company and Garney Companies, Inc., for specialty util...
Attachments: 1. Council Report

_________________________________________________________________________
A repeat in case you missed that:
File #: 19-0430   
Type: Contract Status: Agenda Ready


In control: City Council
On agenda: 4/15/2019

Title: One-Year Term Contract with Two Years of Renewal Options for Five Master Job Order Contracts; three contracts for the General Utility Construction Services and two contracts for Specialty Utility Construction Services. (Citywide) Job Order Master Contracts for general utility construction services will be utilized for projects that are larger in scale, higher in cost, and require more detailed design. The specialty utility construction services will be used for projects that are smaller in scope, are repetitive in nature, and require limited, or no design. Staff recommends the selections of Talis Construction Corporation; Garney Companies, Inc.; and Hunter Contracting Company for general utility construction services. These contracts will be limited to $1,500,000 per job order; a total contract value not-to-exceed $10,000,000 for each year of the contract, per contractor. Staff recommends the selections of Hunter Contracting Company and Garney Companies, Inc., for specialty util...
Attachments: 1. Council Report 
 
_________________________________________________________________________
Item 5 Contracts: 3 of 3
ITEM 5-b
File #: 19-0432   

Type: Contract Status: Agenda Ready


In control: City Council
On agenda: 4/15/2019

Title: One-Year Term Contract with Two Years of Renewal Options for Two Master Job Order Contracts for Landscape Construction Services. (Citywide) Job Order Master Contracts for landscape construction services include renovations and repairs, additions, demolition, and facility upgrades for a broad range of City landscaping improvement projects. Staff recommends the selections of Valley Rain Construction Corporation and Haydon Building Corporation for landscape construction services. These contracts allow for the issuance of multiple individual job orders with a not-to-exceed limit of $1,500,000 per job order; a total contract value not-to-exceed $5,000,000 for each year of the contract, per contractor.
Attachments: 1. Council Report

_________________________________________________________________________
File #:                                                                                                                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                                                                                           
                                                                                                     
                                                                 
                                                                  
                                

______________________________________________________________________                                                                                                                                                                                                                   

                                                                                                                                                                                             


                                                                                                     
                                                                 

                                                                 
                                

_________________________________________________________________________
 

Diversity For Pride-Day In Phoenix: Just One Day

Jennifer Duff and Kate Gallego
with "Hizzoner"
Believe it if you want to, but when two newly-elected women get used as props in a Photo-Opp side-by-side with Mesa Mayor John Giles in a post on Twitter uploaded by Hizzoner himself, ya gotta wonder how mis-guided and hijacked the #MeToo movement has become. . .
It all looks pretty "vanilla" to me after living in New York City for more than 22 years - and completely staged when women submit to stand next to a guy who only pays "lip-service" to protecting the rights of everyone by the force-of-law here in Mesa. . . but hey! "It's the right to do". When is that?

Is Mesa City Manager Now Punching-Above-His-Weight-Class In 2019??

Back in 2012 with former Mayor Scott Smith standing behind him, Chris Brady launched one of the first hard-fisted sales pitches for what was then the biggest $200M jab on the backs of Mesa taxpayers to pay for Municipal Debt Bond Obligations for the Republican Chicago Billionaire Ricketts Family to finance their "Field of Dreams" Sloan Park.
In 2016 taxpayers rejected a low-blow hit under-the-belt. In 2018 Brady came back with a series of blow-by-blow punches to score one more huge Debt Service obligation.
_________________________________________________________________________
Now in 2019 after almost 14 years on-the-job as the highest-paid salaried official inside City Hall, wielding more power as the City's Chief Executive than Mesa Mayor John Giles, he's making the rounds again in a series of presentations before the Mesa City Council that has the power and final approval on proposed budgets: FY2019/2020 and FY2020/24.
All the figures presented as "Power Points" are from the city's OMB working with a group from ASU. There is no other outside objective independent financial analysis, except from one group named Truth In Accounting . . . Furthermore, these jumbles of numbers on slide after slide take more time than  the typical one-day or two-day release to the public for study and examination. The City's Annual Financial Reviews are, likewise, not submitted in a timely manner in the usual 180-day time periodNonethelessss, in the most review by Truth in Accounting, they find Mesa's financing troublesome
What the report said in January 2019
> This

and This >

 
_________________________________________________________________________
Brady has so far this year tried to stay low-key, cool calm and collected wearing shirt-and-tie. He has put other salaried city officials from the Office of Management & Budget and the City Engineer in-the-hot seat at City Council Study Sessions and regular meetings. 
He might loosen-up in public appearances wearing an open-collar shirt [no tie] for what's usual "Casual Friday" attire. 

 Readers of this blog might like to note that there is no "Casual Friday' business code-of-dress - City offices are closed in the official 4/10 workdays per week . . . mebbe city employees like 3-day weekends! They certainly haven't gone back to working the normal five-days-a-week schedule changed during the Great Recession in 2018.You might remeber at earlier budget hearings, Chris Brady got really rattled over questions of forecasting and projections in proposed budgets. Looks like he's learned his lesson when it got ugly on live stream. Can't, however, say that won't happen this year  . . .  
_________________________________________________________________________
ICYMI: Here's a post using the same image above . . .If you want to take a look again at more details than those in this excerpt you can Click Here
THE NUMBERS IN THE CITY MANAGER'S PROPOSED FY2019/2010 and FY2020/2024 BUDGETS HAVE INCREASED
12 February 2019
Time-To-Pay > The-Pied--Piper Moment for Mesa City Manager Chris Brady
What does "he who pays the pied- piper" mean?
Looks like all those Pie-In-The-Sky schemes pushed by Mesa City Manager Chris Brady and the city's Office of Management & Budget during the past four years in that big beautiful "Grab-Bag-of-Goodies" for everybody that tricked Mesa taxpayers to go into more debt in the November 2018 ballot proposals are getting a heavy dose of REALITY . . . Better late than never
East Valley Tribune staff writer Jim Walsh barely hit the nail-on-the-head or scored any points to tell the public what's really going down here in Mesa. He covered "amenities" only, not getting a grip on the tough stuff that's hard to swallow:
Mesa voters approved virtually every sort of municipal amenity in last fall's
$196-million bond issue - from a new library and public safety station to athletic fields and walking paths to new parks and even a dog park . . . One important consideration in adding the new facilities is whether there is enough money available . . . "
WHOA!! Why worry now after all their projections and cost analysis  were wrong? 
"We are concerned as we get to the later part of it, when we deliver big parks and libraries, that will put a lot of strain on the budget"
-- City Manager Chris Brady
 _______________________________________________________________________
SCAMMING THE VOTERS:
Not just so-called "amenties" - ASU is the bigger scam-scheme.
One new building ASU @ Mesa City Center estimated to cost $63,000,000 in preliminary fast-plans to get it started - a scaled -down $200-million "satellite ASU campus" that Mesa taxpayers rejected two years ago - now requires extensive investigation according to a City Council Report last week.


_________________________________________________________________________
kkk








kkk
 

Paul Ryan: A Republican With A Conservative Conscience

Just 14 hours ago in a report written by Justin Wise from MSN News  , the former Speaker of The U.S. House of Representatives, reinforces a call to Republicans to return to what is right: conscience. At the same time he predicted in March that Trump would get re-elected in 2020 due to the Democrats' leftward lurch and record of accomplishments.
Can Ryan get it right both ways?
________________________________________________________________________
Paul Ryan told GOP lawmakers he wouldn't 'defend' Trump after 'Access Hollywood' tape
"Former Speaker Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) reportedly told House Republicans that they could feel free to abandon President Trump after a tape of him making vulgar comments about women emerged during the 2016 presidential campaign.
Ryan made the remarks in what was described as a rare conference call three days after the "Access Hollywood" tape emerged in October 2016, according to an excerpt from the new book, "A Hill to Die On," as reported by Axios.
"I am not going to defend Donald Trump," Ryan said, according to the book. "Not now, not in the future."
Ryan and Trump were known to have had a rocky relationship during Trump's first two years as president. Trump once asked the former Speaker why he wasn't more "loyal" to him in 2017, according to a book written by Cliff Sims, formerly a White House communications staffer.
Axios, citing "A Hill To Die On," notes that Trump said he was able to give Ryan a pass for his disloyalty "because it's life and we sort of need each other a little bit."
Ryan predicted in March that Trump would win reelection in 2020 because of his ideas and "record of accomplishment."
"We're clearly better off because of [Trump]," he tweeted. "His record of accomplishment is why he'll win re-election especially when compared to Dems' leftward lurch."
________________________________________________________________
Illustration: Lazaro Gamio/Axios
From Jonathan Swan 11 hours ago: Link > Axios
Trump to Paul Ryan after Access Hollywood tape: "You're just a Boy Scout" 
"You'll find a trove of deeply sourced reporting in the new book, out Tuesday, by Politico's Playbook authors Jake Sherman and Anna Palmer. Here's a taste of the reporting from Trump's Washington, found in "The Hill to Die On."

NO CAPTAIN ONBOARD