Sunday, July 05, 2020

The Fair Housing Act 1968 & Segregated Suburbs 2020

OK. Let's go there. . . Better yet for hyper-local  emphasis, let's go right here - to Mesa, Arizona.
Whether you admit or acknowledge it, or not, we do have a history of housing discrimination here that goes back for more than a few decades when two groups, blacks and Mexicans, were excluded from living in or buying homes in certain neighborhoods downtown.
It's a sensitive subject and may expose some raw nerves when it extends to Mesa's fast-growing suburbs.
Nonetheless, according to Section D III of The City of Mesa Ethics Handbook
"Elected officials and advisory board members have a duty to create the image and reality of a responsive, accessible, and fair city government. "
Here's a reference for your interest:
https://mesazona.blogspot.com/2020/07/city-of-mesa-ethics-handbook-policy-for.html
_______________________________________________________________
Why go there now? (Readers of this blog might ask)
#1 The most immediate concern might be two items on the Tentative Agenda for a Mesa City Council meeting this Thursday, July 8, 2020 - Items 6d and 6d

Here's the Resolution Item 6-d with links to attachments in the file
File #: 20-0499   
Type: Resolution Status: Agenda Ready
In control: City Council
On agenda: 7/8/2020
Title: Approving and authorizing the City Manager to submit the City of Mesa Five-Year Consolidated Plan for Fiscal Years 2020/2021 through 2024/2025, Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing, and the Annual Action Plan for Fiscal Year 2020/2021; authorizing the submittal of applications to receive entitlement funds for Fiscal Year 2020/2021 under the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Community Development Block Grant program (CDBG), Emergency Solutions Grant program (ESG) and the HOME Investment Partnership Program (HOME) to fund activities approved by the City Council; and authorizing the City Manager to expend, disburse and enter into agreements for disbursement of Fiscal Year 2020/2021 CDBG, ESG, and HOME funds received by the City. (Citywide)
Attachments: 1. Council Report,
2. Attachment A - Funding Recommendations,
3. Resolution,
4. Consolidated Plan
_________________________________________________________________________
Why go there now? PART 2
This article by Kriston Copps with extracts taken from

On Segregated Suburbs, Trump Says the Quiet Part Out Loud

Targeting HUD’s Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing rule, the president said on Twitter that enforcing housing desegregation would have a “devastating impact.”
‎July‎ ‎2‎, ‎2020‎ ‎8‎:‎12‎ ‎AM
"President Donald Trump on Tuesday said he would reverse a federal rule that promotes fair housing and sets desegregation as a national priority. The policy is known as Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing, or AFFH; it’s a provision of the Fair Housing Act of 1968, signed into law a week after the assassination of Martin Luther King Jr.
“At the request of many great Americans who live in the Suburbs, and others,” Trump tweeted, “I am studying the AFFH housing regulation that is having a devastating impact on these once thriving Suburban areas. Corrupt Joe Biden wants to make them MUCH WORSE. Not fair to homeowners, I may END!”
Trump was specifically aiming at an Obama rule about how to finally implement the policy, a mandate (on paper only) for more than 50 years due to federal reluctance to address racial segregation.
As he’s done time and time again, Trump said the quiet part out loud. The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development has taken numerous steps to undermine key rules and policies that promote desegregation as a requirement for jurisdictions that receive federal housing dollars. . .
The change of course at HUD comes at a time when mass deaths from coronavirus and sustained protests over police brutality have forced lawmakers to confront the systemic disparities faced by Black Americans, immigrants, and people of color. Advocates argue that reversing housing discrimination is a crucial first step toward equality. . ."
________________________________________________________________
NOW COMES THE HARD PART: It's up to you to connect the dots
________________________________________________________________
RELATED CONTENT ON THIS BLOG > Use the Searchbox using some of these key words
Affordable, equitable and fair
Affordable housing crisis
Action Neighborhood Alliance
NIMBY
YIMBY

Some of Mesa's enclaves that are fast-growing:
Eastmark
Cadence
The Groves

2nd Quarter GDP 2020 Prediction: Revised Downward Slump 4.6%

That's one forecast published online today from https://www.bloomberg.com/
"Economists revised down their estimates for the U.S. economy this quarter, but predicted it will be back on track in September after some states imposed fresh restrictions to combat the coronavirus...
“A combination of tighter state restrictions and voluntary social distancing is already having a noticeable impact on economic activity,” the economists said in a report published on Saturday
The economists said they now expect the economy to grow 25% in the third quarter having previously predicted 33%. That would result in the economy slumping 4.6% this year, worse than the 4.2% previously seen.
But the Goldman Sachs economists said they still expected growth of 5.8% next year and now project unemployment will be at 9% at the end of this year, down from the previous estimate of 9.5%.
READ MORE
Goldman Lowers U.S. GDP Forecast,
Sees 4.6% Contraction in 2020
Goldman Sachs Group Inc

Saturday, July 04, 2020

City of Mesa Ethics Handbook: Policy for Elected Officials and Board Members

Office of The City Manager
20 East Main Street,
Suite 750 P.O. Box 1466
Mesa, Arizona 85211-1466
www.mesaaz.gov

480.644.3300
_________________________________________________________________________
Elected officials and advisory board members have a duty to create the image and reality of a responsive, accessible, and fair city government.
__________________________________________________________________________________
Table of Contents
Section I: City of Mesa Ethics Policy.......................................4


Section II:  Applicable Laws and Policies................................5
A. General Character..........................................................5
B. Conflict of Interest...........................................................6
C. Legal Compliance...........................................................8
D. Political Activities...........................................................11
E. Facilities, Resources and Expenses.............................12

Section III: Procedures..........................................................14
A. Where to Seek Advice..................................................14
B. What to Do if You Are Uncertain...................................14
C. How to Declare a Possible Conflict..............................14
D. Where to Report Improper Behavior............................15

Section IV: Penalties and Sanctions......................................15
Section V: Adoption and Amendment...................................

Section III: Procedures
C. . How to Declare a Possible Conflict
______________________________________________________________________
If an official believes that a conflict of interest (or even a possible conflict) exists, then he or she should disclose the fact as soon as possible.
For example, as soon as an elected official or advisory board member realizes that a conflict exists on a given matter, they must disclose the conflicting interest on the record for the minutes.
> From that point on, the official shall not participate in any manner (by discussing, questioning or voting) in that matter.
> Declaring a conflict and not participating should be recognized as a necessary part of preserving public trust and should not be avoided simply because of delays or inconvenience.
Indeed, officials should declare possible conflicts to avoid any appearance of impropriety.

Section III: Procedures
D. Where to Report Improper Behavior
_________________________________________________________________________ 
Elected officials and advisory board members have a duty to create the image and reality of a responsive, accessible, and fair city government.
> Accordingly, council and advisory board members have a duty to report if another elected official or advisory board member is violating laws or ethics relating to city government, as set forth in this code and handbook.
> Moreover, officials shall never attempt to use their authority or influence for the purpose of intimidating, threatening, coercing, commanding or influencing any person with the intent of interfering with that person’s duty to disclose such improper activity.
If an official believes that someone else may have violated this Handbook, they may consult with the City Attorney’s Office, the City Clerk, or their colleagues.

16 City of Mesa

Section IV: Penalties and Sanctions
__________________________________________________________________________ 
It is the intent of the City Council to educate, and where necessary, discipline board or councilmembers who violate this Code and Handbook.
Discipline shall be progressive, from the least punitive to the most punitive measures, unless the Council believes progressive discipline does not provide the appropriate sanction because of the gravity of the offense, or because the Council does not believe the sanction would deter future misconduct.
In all instances, the totality of the circumstances shall be taken into consideration in resolving a matter, including the intent of the one accused of wrongdoing.
This Code does not prevent informal resolution of minor infractions, such as by immediate corrective action of the possible misconduct.

City of Mesa Economic Development Advisory Board

"The Economic Development Advisory Board shall act as the advisory board to the Mesa City Council on matters pertaining to economic development, including goal setting, strategic planning, marketing and business recruitment, retention and expansion.
The membership of the Economic Development Advisory Board shall include:
> nine (9) voting members who are residents of Mesa and
> up to six (6) ex-officio non-voting members.
Three of the ex-officio members shall be the Mayor, City Manager, and the President and Chief Executive Officer of the Mesa Chamber of Commerce, and
three may be City of Mesa representatives that are currently sitting on the Greater Phoenix Economic Council Board of Directors.
The members of the Board shall be appointed by the Mayor with the approval of the City Council for staggered terms of three (3) years. 
All terms shall terminate on June 30 of the applicable year
No member shall serve more than two (2) complete consecutive terms; however, a member may be reappointed after the lapse of one (1) year from the ending of the previous term.
Call 480-644-2398 for information.
________________________________________________________________________________
AGENDAS AND MINUTES
http://apps.mesaaz.gov/meetingarchive/meetings=EDAB

Economic Development Advisory Board Minutes and Agendas

  Search Minutes & Agendas
  Economic Development Advisory Board Home
Meeting DateDocument TitleMeeting TypeDocument Type 
6/2/2020June 2, 2020 AgendaRegularAgendas
6/2/2020June 2, 2020 ResultsRegularResults
5/5/2020May 5, 2020 AgendaRegularAgendas
5/5/2020May 5, 2020 Approved MinutesRegularMinutes
5/5/2020May 5, 2020 ResultsRegularResults
4/7/2020April 7, 2020 CANCELLATION NOTICERegularAgendas
3/3/2020March 3, 2020 AgendaRegularAgendas
3/3/2020March 3, 2020 Approved MinutesRegularMinutes
3/3/2020March 3, 2020 ResultsRegularResults
2/11/2020February 11, 2020 AgendaRegularAgendas
2/11/2020February 11, 2020 Approved MinutesRegularMinutes
2/11/2020February 11, 2020 ResultsRegularResults
1/7/2020January 7, 2020 AgendaRegularAgendas
1/7/2020January 7, 2020 Approved MinutesRegularMinutes
1/7/2020January 7, 2020 ResultsRegularResults


Board member

Role

Date appointed

Term expires

Rich Adams
President & CEO, Southwest Business Credit Services

Voting member
1st Partial Term

7/2/18

6/30/20

Brian Campbell
Attorney, Campbell Law Group of Arizona, PLLC

Voting member
1st Term

7/2/18

6/30/21

Deb Duvall
Community Volunteer

Voting member
2nd Term

7/1/19

6/30/22

Jim Kasselmann
General Manager, Dexcom

Vice Chair -Voting member
1st Term

7/1/17

6/30/20

Matt Likens
President & CEO, GT Medical Technologies, Inc.

Voting member
2nd Term

7/1/19

6/30/22

Christopher Nickerson
Director of Business Development, Banner Desert Medical Center/Cardon Children’s Medical Center

Voting member
1st Partial Term

5/7/19

6/30/21

Natascha Ovando-Karadsheh
Associate Broker/Owner, KOR Properties

Chair - Voting member
1st Term

7/1/17

6/30/20

Dominic Perry
Associate, Avison Young

Voting member
1st Term

7/1/17

6/30/20

Brad Wilson
Owner, GM Biomedical, LLC

Voting member
1st Term

7/1/19

6/30/22

John GilesMayor, City of Mesa

Ex-Officio member
  

Chris Brady City Manager, City of Mesa

Ex-Officio member 
  

Sally HarrisonPresident & CEO, Mesa Chamber of Commerce

Ex-Officio member
  

Jeffrey S. Pitcher
Partner, Stinson LLP

Ex-Officio member
  
Dan OlsonVice President and General Manager, Armament Systems Business Unit, Northrop Grumman Innovation Systems

Ex-Officio member
  
Staff
William JabjiniakEconomic Development Director
City of Mesa
william.jabjiniak@mesaaz.gov

________________________________________________________________________________
Reference: https://www.mesaaz.gov/government
 

The Dangers of Facial Recognition Technology > The Key To All Your Information

Why Facial Recognition Technology Is So Dangerous
56,142 views
About Second Thought:
Second Thought is a channel devoted to the things in life worth thinking about! Science, history, politics, religion...basically everything you're not supposed to talk about at the dinner table.
Welcome!
 
Government crackdowns, hyper-personalized ads, real-time location tracking of citizens. Mass surveillance is a growing threat in the modern world. In this episode, we'll take a look at why it's so dangerous. Citations: Law enforcement database study: https://www.perpetuallineup.org Palantir: https://www.bloomberg.com/features/20... 8 out of 42 accuracy rate: https://48ba3m4eh2bf2sksp43rq8kk-wpen... Racial and gender bias: http://news.mit.edu/2018/study-finds-... Harrisburg University press release: https://archive.is/N1HVe Big companies stepping away from facial recognition: https://www.cpomagazine.com/data-priv... Why Facial Recognition Technology Is So Dangerous – Second Thought SUBSCRIBE HERE: http://bit.ly/2nFsvTS WATCH LAST VIDEO HERE: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list... New video every Friday! Follow Second Thought on Social Media! Twitter: https://twitter.com/_SecondThought Patreon: https://patreon.com/secondthought Watch More Second Thought: Latest Uploads: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list... Spaaaaaace!: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list... What If...: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list... Popular Videos: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list...

More Money CMAR Contracts for ASU Money-Pit ??

More than six months after the "Ground-Breaking" + million$$ more than the initial $63.5M approved by the Mesa City Council, there's not much progress to be seen above-ground in this image taken on-site last week for "The ASU Creative Futures Lab" or "The Studios @ Mesa City Center in a parking lot on Pepper Place and Centennial Drive.
< Take a look
_________________________________________________________________________


___________________________________________________________________________ 
Item 5-g
File #: 20-0730   

Type: Contract Status: Agenda Ready


In control: City Council
On agenda: 7/8/2020

Title: The Studios @ Mesa City Center -
Construction Manager at Risk (CMAR) Selection and
Pre-Construction Services Contract (District 4) 
In February 2018, Council approved an Intergovernmental Agreement with Arizona State University for a new academic building in downtown Mesa (ASU Creative Futures Laboratory). 
This agreement also included provisions for ASU to assist with the programming of the vacant City-owned building located at 59 East 1st Street, which requires the renovation of 6,000 - 12,000 square-foot of the existing 26,500 sf building, to be called The Studios @ Mesa City Center. 
This pre-construction phase of the renovation project consists of working closely with the project team to develop the project design, review the design for constructability, prepare cost estimates, and develop the project schedule and phasing plan. 
Staff recommends the selection of Okland Construction as the CMAR for this project and award a Pre-Construction Services contract in the amount of $98,322. This project is funded by the Economic Investment Fund                                
Attachments: 1. Council Report,
2. Project Location Map
________________________________________________________________________
CITY COUNCIL REPORT
Date:  July 8, 2020
To:  City Council
Through: Kari Kent, Assistant City Manager
From:  Beth Huning, City Engineer   Marc Ahlstrom, Assistant City Engineer 
 
 
Subject: The Studios @ Mesa City Center  
              City Project No. CP0880
District 4 
Purpose and Recommendation.
The purpose of this report is to provide information to the Council concerning the selection of a Construction Manager at Risk (CMAR) for the proposed The Studios @ Mesa City Center project (Refer to Exhibit “A” for the project location).   
Staff recommends that Council approve the selection of Okland Construction as the CMAR for this project and award a Pre-Construction Services contract in the amount of $98,322.
   
Background 
In February 2018, Council approved an Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA) with Arizona State University (ASU) for a new academic building in downtown Mesa (ASU Creative Futures Laboratory). 
This agreement also included provisions for ASU to assist with the programming of the vacant City-owned building located at 59 E 1st Street. 
In November 2018, the City and ASU subsequently entered into a lease agreement for the new academic building and the vacant City building. 
Phase 1 of the lease agreement requires the renovation of 6,000 – 12,000 square-foot of the existing 26,500 sf building which will be called The Studios @ Mesa City Center.  
Located in the heart of Downtown Mesa's Innovation District and managed/programmed by ASU, The Studios @ Mesa City Center will align world-class industry leaders, budding entrepreneurs, and cutting edge academic insight to create a one of a kind ecosystem empowering a modern workforce development and startup pipeline to fuel the economy of today and tomorrow.      
The facility will also have a close functional relationship with the adjacent ASU Creative Futures Laboratory
 
The renovated building will have a complimentary aesthetic to the new ASU facility and will be designed to integrate into the overall Mesa City Center development. 
   
2
Discussion 
In March 2020, Staff received eleven “Statements of Qualifications” (SOQ) from contractors proposing to act as the CMAR for this project. Based on an evaluation of these SOQ’s and subsequent interviews, Okland Construction was recommended as the most qualified CMAR.
Staff has prepared a contract and negotiated the fee for the PreConstruction Services contract.
During the Pre-Construction Phase, the CMAR will work closely with the project team to
> develop the project design,
> review the design for constructability,
> prepare cost estimates, and
> develop the project schedule and phasing plan.   
The last item developed during the Pre-Construction Phase will be the “Guaranteed Maximum Price” (GMP) for the project.
This GMP will then be brought back to the Council for review and approval.   
 
Once underway, construction of this project is anticipated to last approximately 8 months

Alternatives 
An alternative to the approval of this Pre-Construction Services contract for the selected CMAR would be to construct this project using the traditional Design/Bid/Build method.  This is not recommended due to the need for the additional services provided by a CMAR contractor during the design phase. 
The proposed The Studios @ Mesa City Center project will require
> extensive on-site investigation,
> phasing,
> construction sequencing,
> constructability analysis, and
> cost evaluation
by the contractor throughout the design phase. 
Another alternative is to not perform the work. This is not recommended because this would be contrary to the IGA and associated lease between the City and ASU. 
Fiscal Impact 
This pre-construction services contract is in the amount of $98,322.   
This project is funded by Economic Investment Fund. 
 
Coordinated With 
The City Manager’s Offices concur with this recommendation.

 

BEA News: Gross Domestic Product by State and Personal Income by State, 3rd Quarter 2025

  BEA News: Gross Domestic Product by State and Personal Income by S...