Wednesday, August 12, 2020

Lop-Sided August 4 Primary Election 2020: Unofficial Results

Where Have All the Voters Gone? | The Tyee 
Low Voter Turnout Is Not An Accident - in fact that is what entrenched and generations-old Political Machines are counting on when they can deliver a bloc of votes.
In one Mesa City Council race in District 2 there was a good example of that when one inexperienced candidate was hand-selected by Mayor John Giles - and doused with thousands of dollars in disclosures made in required Campaign Financial Statements - to unseat the incumbent Jeremy Whittaker. That was the closest contest for the Mesa City Council.
_________________________________________________________________________
Last Sunday the The Mesa Tribune had this to say:
After his resounding re-election to his second and last full four-year term, Mayor John Giles cherishes the lengthy 10-year opportunity voters have given him to make his hometown better.
". . . Ten years is a long time, Giles said – Long enough to see projects he started come to fruition, such as the asu@mesacity city center and two closely-related spinoffs – a plaza and an incubation studio in the city’s vacant former Information Technology building. . .
With four more years from a lopsided win Aug. 4 over constitutionalist Verl Farnworth – 60,313-30,360 in unofficial results, a 67-33 percent margin – Giles might even see the city’s long-dormant Site 17 redevelopment project downtown become an important asset.
In District One, Vice Mayor Mark Freeman, a close Giles ally, won an equally lopsided victory over former mayoral candidate Danny Ray, 10,235-4,696, a 69-31 percent margin.
Giles scored a secondary victory of sorts in District 2, even though he wasn’t on the ballot, when his hand-picked candidate, political novice Julie Spilsbury, coasted to a comfortable victory over Jeremy Whittaker, Giles’ unofficial nemesis, 8,465-6,802, a 55-45 percent margin.
The turnout was uninspiring at nearly 35 percent for mayor and nearly 38 percent for the two council races, with District Three council member Francisco Heredia winning an uncontested seat after opponent Christopher Bown dropped out
Even without Whittaker’s criticisms from the council dais, Giles anticipates opposition, saying, “These ideas get better with constructive criticism.’’
Despite his loss, Farnsworth said he’s concerned about Giles facing little opposition from council and that he will be watching carefully and speaking loudly when necessary.
Farnsworth is especially concerned about what he calls private-public partnerships, essentially the tax incentive deals the city has used with downtown redevelopment and economic development projects.
“I will monitor their conduct on behalf of the people. I will speak against intrusions on the public’s trust and resources,’’ Farnsworth said.
“I think we are in for a rocky road.’’
But Spilsbury sees no rocks to climb, just opportunities to work well with others and get important work done. She said she won’t bow to anyone, but she also will be constructive.
She said the mayor, City Manager Chris Brady and virtually the entire council called her or texted her, congratulating her on her victory over Whittaker and welcoming her to the council. She will be seated in January.
“I’ve been given leadership qualities by God. I can make things happen,’’ Spilsbury said. . .
Spilsbury has mainly been noted in the past as a school volunteer and said she didn’t know initially that serving on the council was a paid position when she was weighing a bid at elected office.
She said she would like to think that residents voted for her because of her years of building relationships in the community as a mother and a lifelong Mesa resident, but acknowledged the impact of Giles support, saying, “I’m sure that didn’t hurt me.’’
_________________________________________________________________________________This infographic in general might help to explain Voter Turnout in two of the contests where the incumbent received about 2/3 of the ballots cast

Contest for Mayor received about 97,000 ballots with a VT = 34.85%
That's about only 1 out of 5 of those who were eligible to vote
Contest for Mesa City Council in District 1 received about 17,000 ballots with a VT = 37.28%
That's about only 1 out of 4 of those who were eligible to vote
 
THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN EDUCATION AND VOTER TURNOUT

_______________________________________________________________________________
The Race for Mayor
Source: https://recorder.maricopa.gov/electionresults/primary2020.aspx
 Mesa's Primary Election field established The Mesa Tribune | The ...
Mesa-MayorBallot Cast: 97193Turnout: 34.85%Vote for 1
  FARNSWORTH, VERL30,360
33%
33%   
  GILES, JOHN*60,313
67%
67%    
Mesa Dist 1-CouncilmemberBallot Cast: 17254Turnout: 37.28%Vote for 1
  FREEMAN, MARK*10,235
69%
69%
  RAY, DANNY4,696
31%
31%
Mesa Dist 2-CouncilmemberBallot Cast: 16508Turnout: 36.76%Vote for 1
  SPILSBURY, JULIE*8,465
55%
55%
  WHITTAKER, JEREMY6,802
45%
45%
Mesa Dist 3-CouncilmemberBallot Cast: 12978Turnout: 29.69%Vote for 1
  HEREDIA, FRANCISCO*10,467
100%
100%
_________________________________________________________________________


August 4, 2020, Primary Election
Unofficial Election Results (Includes Early Ballots)
(Information refreshes automatically)
Mayor
Polling Places Reported:
83 of 84 (98.81%)
Farnsworth, Verl30,36033.48%
 
Giles, John60,31366.52%
 
Write-in00.00%
 

Councilmember - District 1
Polling Places Reported:
13 of 14 (92.86%)
Freeman, Mark10,23568.55%
 
Ray, Danny4,69631.45%
 
Write-in00.00%
 

Councilmember - District 2
Polling Places Reported:
10 of 11 (90.91%)
Spilsbury, Julie8,46555.45%
 
Whittaker, Jeremy6,80244.55%
 
Write-in00.00%
 

Councilmember - District 3
Polling Places Reported:
11 of 12 (91.67%)
Heredia, Francisco10,467100.00%
 
Write-in00.00%
 

 

VP Pence Here In Mesa Yesterday @ Delta Hotels by Marriott For "Latter-day Saints for Trump” Coalition Launch

Pence Visits Tucson, Mesa, Accepts Endorsement | Arizona Daily ...

Vice President Pence Hosts "Latter-day Saints for Trump ...

www.c-span.org › video › vice-president-pence-hosts-latt...
Vice President Pence Hosts "Latter-day Saints for Trump" Event in Arizona.
15 hours ago
___________________________________________________________
Vice President Pence Hosts "Latter-day Saints for Trump" Event in ...
Vice President Pence Hosts "Latter-day Saints for Trump" Event in Arizona
Vice President Pence speaks at an event in support of President Trump’s reelection hosted by the campaign and targeted toward members of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.
558 Views
Program ID:
474600-1
Category:
Public Affairs Event
Format:
Speech
Location:
Mesa, Arizona, United States
First Aired:
Aug 11, 2020 | 5:41pm EDT | C-SPAN.org
_________________________________________________________________
 
 

Tuesday, August 11, 2020

Breweries & Bars: IBarometers of Downtown Revitalization & Renewal

City Hall officials have experimented with nearly everything here in The Old Doughnut-Hole better known as "the vibrant and exciting Downtown Mesa" - an "Arts-and-Entertainment District" kicked-off with $100M in 2005 that hasn't happened. . ." The Salvation Train" of Valley Metro Light Rail Service into the central business district that never arrived . . . followed by the not-happening any time soon retail, innovation, restaurant, and live-ability/residential pattern of revitalization we have seen in many other cities.We did have a boom in bars and breweries - six or seven of them.  
But what's on tap here? . . .
What happens now, when the very elements of that copy-cat scheme just don't work out —crowds in the taproom, live events, drop-in traffic from tourists or ballgame crowds or shoppers strolling the downtown—are gone or diminished?
Reporter's Notebook

Deborah and James Fallows tell their stories in The Atlantic
__________________________________________________________________________
Are these the biggest business and civic stories of America’s current disastrous dislocations?
Of course they are not. But the rise of small, locally minded restaurants, coffee shops, bars, breweries, and other gathering places has been an important element in many cities’ growth in the past decade . . .
_________________________________________________________________________
Right!
Here in Mesa behind City Hall it's a gamble to make this place on a parking lot the Mesa City Center  ... Drink Up!








Income Inequality > Where's The Rage Today In The Right Place & The Right Time?

The Creation of The Board Game Monopoly with an updated local version here in Mesa.
It's an American classic of working-class ingenuity that The Great Depression helped launch. Today the rage over Income Inequality rages all over the world.
Deseret Management Corporation 
Property Reserve, Inc.
Suburban Land Reserve, Inc
Zion Public Finance Group
Deseret Trust Company
LDS Family Services
Property Reserves Inc. (PRI)
______________________________
BLOGGER INSERT >
______________________________________
 

EXPLANATORY JOURNALISM > Issues In A Broader Context

A swath of articles published today in TECHDIRT https://www,techdirt.com
WHY THE HELL ARE THEY SELLING RESIDENTS DATA?

from the time-to-start-cutting-the-public-in-on-the-scam dept

Congressional legislators -- apparently caught off guard by one state's revenue stream -- are asking the California Department of Motor Vehicles a
$50 million question:
why the hell are you selling residents' personal data?
A group of nearly a dozen lawmakers led by member of Congress Anna Eshoo wrote to the California Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) on Wednesday looking for answers on how and why the organization sells the personal data of residents. The letter comes after Motherboard revealed last year that the DMV was making $50 million annually from selling drivers' information.
As Karl Bode noted last year when covering this revelation, this sale of data is codified. The Driver's Privacy Protection Act doesn't do much to protect drivers' privacy. It may prevent abuse of this data by government employees but none of that affects private sector access where the real money is made.
The data from the California DMV is sold to a variety of data brokers. The public records request that resulted in this windfall of transparency about the DMV's windfall of actual money didn't name any of its customers. But did show a steady increase in revenue over the five years the records covered.
The letter [PDF] signed by nine members of Congress -- including California Congressional rep Ted Lieu -- asks the DMV a lot of pointed questions about its practice of profiting off data Californians are forced to hand over in exchange for licenses. It asks the questions the records obtained by Motherboard left unanswered. First off, the legislators want to know who this data is being sold to.
The legislators also want to know if this data is being shared with ICE and other federal agencies for the purposes of locating undocumented immigrants. It also asks if Californians can ask to opt out of the data sales/sharing and whether the agency would honor any of these requests.
The legislators note that they're concerned about this practice they probably should have already been aware of -- especially the two California assembly members who also signed the letter.
[W]e’re troubled by press reports about the California DMV’s disclosure of vast quantities of data which could enable invasive biometric policing and be a symptom of a deeper privacy malady. [...] What information is being sold, to whom it is sold, and what guardrails are associated with the sale remain unclear.
The DMV has already answered some of these questions... sort of.
In a statement to Motherboard, the DMV said the $50 million/year it makes on data sales only offsets the cost of "administering its requester program." It denies selling information to marketers. It did not deny selling info to data brokers or other common customers for DMV data, like credit reporting agencies.
"The DMV takes its obligation to protect personal information very seriously. Information is only released according to California law, and the DMV continues to review its release practices to ensure information is only released to authorized persons/entities and only for authorized purposes. For example, if a car manufacturer is required to send a recall notice to thousands of owners of a particular model of car, the DMV may provide the car manufacturer with information on California owners of this particular model through this program," the statement added.
"Only released according to California law." That's the problem.
The law allows the DMV to sell data to private companies. It takes a few purchases to add up to $50 million. Handing out info to car manufacturers for recalls is probably something the DMV does for a minimal cost, if it even charges anything for it.
The DMV's statement sounds good but really says nothing. No one will really know what happens to the data the DMV collects until it starts handing over detailed answers to these questions from Congress.
 

Zelensky Calls for a European Army as He Slams EU Leaders’ Response

      Jan 23, 2026 During the EU Summit yesterday, the EU leaders ...