Thursday, July 08, 2021

40 Basis-Point Bond Move 'Is No Joke,' Says UBS' Brown

PLEASE JOIN IN THE "CONVERSATION" > Virtual Meeting | ADEQ Talks Surface Water Quality | Aug. 5, 2021, 1 – 2 p.m

It's about time - this announcement is for a ONE-HOUR "Virtual Event" with six updates.
You Guys Are Everything - Everything GIF - Everything YouGuysAreEverything  AmericaGotTalent - Discover & Share GIFs
That's just about ten minutes each for:
1 evolving federal programs,
2 the new state program,
3 permit questions and changes,
4 surface water quality standards,
5 impaired waters,
6 rulemaking
..........................................................and more
surface water protection

ADEQ Talks Surface Water Quality

Permittees and other stakeholders are invited to join ADEQ for this one-hour virtual event, as we provide updates regarding evolving federal programs, the new state program, permit questions and changes, surface water quality standards, impaired waters, rulemaking and more.

ADEQ surface water quality improvement, permitting and compliance staff will also discuss our preparations for permitting related to the Surface Water Protection Program.

Meeting Details
Thursday, Aug. 5, 2021
1 – 2 p.m.
Online via GoToWebinar | Register Today >

Following this session you will receive an opportunity to provide feedback to help us determine if these informational sessions are helpful.

ADEQ appreciates your participation and input. 

Please share this invitation with others in your network who may be interested. 


For more information, visit azdeq.gov/SWPP


About ADEQ

Under the Environmental Quality Act of 1986, the Arizona State Legislature established the Arizona Department of Environmental Quality in 1987 as the state agency for protecting and enhancing public health and the environment of Arizona. For more information, visit azdeq.gov.

ADEQ will take reasonable measures to provide access to department services to individuals with limited ability to speak, write or understand English and/or to those with disabilities. Requests for language translation, ASL interpretation, CART captioning services or disability accommodations must be made at least 48 hours in advance by contacting the Title VI Nondiscrimination Coordinator at 602-771-2215 or Communications@azdeq.gov. For a TTY or other device, Telecommunications Relay Services are available by calling 711.

ADEQ tomará las medidas razonables para proveer acceso a los servicios del departamento a personas con capacidad limitada para hablar, escribir o entender inglés y/o para personas con discapacidades. Las solicitudes de servicios de traducción de idiomas, interpretación ASL (lengua de signos americano), subtitulado de CART, o adaptaciones por discapacidad deben realizarse con al menos 48 horas de anticipación comunicándose con el Coordinador de Anti-Discriminación del
Título VI al 602-771-2215 o Communications@azdeq.gov. Para un TTY u otro dispositivo, los servicios de retransmisión de telecomunicaciones están disponible llamando al 711. 


 AZDEQ Logo QUESTIONS?
Contact Us
 
STAY CONNECTED
 

Reflation Angst Spreads to Stocks

Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War Season Four: Mauer Der Toten - Official...

Wednesday, July 07, 2021

****WHOA **** 40 Calendar-Days SUMMER BREAK for The Mesa City Council July 9 - August 19th

Say What?? . . See for yourselves
Pin on Guillermo
 
NEXT MONTH AUGUST 2021 -
City Council Study Session August 19, 2021
 
THIS MONTH JULY 2021 -
City Council Study Session and Regular Meeting Thursday July 8, 2021
                                
 

When it comes to Biometric Tech Use in "Smart Cities" Seattle and Phoenix (Mesa) are Far Apart

You might not know it if you ever bother to take the time to read the Meeting Details for contract awards, but there's usually a phrase connected: "part of Mesa's Smart Cities Initiative".
There's a lot packed-into all that - one component is Facial Recognition.
But let's take a leap and note that there is at least one Arizona "columnist" (Jon Talton) who knows two cities first-hand: Seattle and Phoenix Metro Areas - both are homes to Amazon and Microsoft . . that's getting to the reason for uploading this post.
HEADLINE BRIEF from Smart Cities Dive                

Seattle-area county say it's first US county to pass facial recognition ban                            

Dive Brief:

With the Seattle area being a home for tech giants and facial recognition software providers Amazon and Microsoft, the action to largely limit the category's applications is especially significant, said Brian Hofer, chair and executive director of Oakland, California-based Secure Justice, an organization that stands against government and corporate over-reach. "Symbolism does have real value ... it sends a message specifically to those companies marketing this technology that at least there in the county, a [significant] portion of the community does not want this technology to be used," Hofer said.
===============================================================
INSERT
China's Artificial Intelligence Surveillance State Goes Global - The  Atlantic

The Smart 5G City Means Permanent Surveillance and Risk

https://foreignpolicy.com › 2021/04/17 › smart-cities-surv...
https://foreignpolicy.com › 2021/04/17 › smart-cities-surv...
Apr 17, 2021 — Becoming “smart” typically involves harnessing troves of data to optimize city functions—from more efficient use of utilities and other services to ...
==============================================================

Dive Insight:

Facial recognition systems can in part analyze surveillance images to enable law enforcement or other actors to identify individuals. But despite the possible contributions of such capabilities in criminal investigations, the technology prompts invasion of privacy concerns. . .

Minimal guardrails exist at the state or federal level, and local jurisdictions have increasingly taken matters into their own hands.

In King County, "The use of facial recognition technology by government agencies poses distinct threats to our residents, including potential misidentification, bias, and the erosion of our civil liberties," said Councilmember Jeanne Kohl-Welles, who sponsored the legislation, in a statement. "The use or misuse of these technologies has potentially devastating consequences which the new ordinance will help to prevent."

The King County decision came about two weeks after Amazon said it would extend a moratorium on police use of its facial recognition software indefinitely. Amazon last June put in place a one-year moratorium.

Recognizing the debates happening in localities across the country, the National League of Cities (NLC) issued a report earlier this year with information regarding how cities might approach the use and regulation of facial recognition technology.

"[M]any cities across the country are wrestling with the decision on how they approach it. Especially in the absence of federal guidance, cities and counties are really left to regulate the use themselves," said Brooks Rainwater, senior executive of NLC's Center for City Solutions. "We're in support of cities looking at the scope of facial recognition and deciding whether this is a tool that should be used in their community, or on the flip side whether or not it should be banned from either municipal use or all uses within that city." NLC does not take its own stance on whether or not a city ought to employ the technology.

King County's limitations on the technology, like most other localities that have taken action, does not cover private use of the technology. On the opposite coast, Baltimore is now considering a ban similar to Portland, Oregon's that could prohibit private use. The Security Industry Association, which counts Microsoft among its members, is speaking out against the scope Baltimore is proposing.

The debate has also elevated to the state level. Massachusetts passed a series of statewide restrictions in May on how police can and cannot use the technology in criminal investigations, and a bill is currently moving through Maine's state legislature that would limit the technology's use by state and local law enforcement.

Federal action may be on the horizon as well.

Sen. Jeff Merkley, D-Ore., last year helped introduce multiple pieces of legislation that would respectively establish a moratorium on the federal government's use of the technology until Congress outlines specific uses for the data; rescind federal support from state and local law enforcement entities using biometric technology; and prohibit private companies from "harvesting or profiting from" customer or employee biometric data without permission.

Merkley has plans to reintroduce the Facial Recognition and Biometric Technology Moratorium Act, which was brought forth last June but did not make it to a vote, Morning Brew reported on Friday.

Recommended Reading:

 
 
More

Tuesday, July 06, 2021

NEW DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE MODERNIZATION: Joint Warfighter Cloud Capability

A controversial IDIQ contract got terminated

Pentagon kills Microsoft’s $10B JEDI cloud contract, says tech is now outdated

Pentagon kills Microsoft’s $10B JEDI cloud contract, says tech is now outdated

Amazon's legal stall tactics seem to have paid off.

"Following years of controversy and intrigue, the Pentagon canceled its JEDI cloud computing contract with Microsoft today.

Microsoft was awarded the contract in October 2019, but work stalled as Amazon, the other finalist, mounted a legal challenge. Now, the Department of Defense has scrapped the entire project, saying that it’s out of date.

“The Department has determined that, due to evolving requirements, increased cloud conversancy, and industry advances, the JEDI Cloud contract no longer meets its needs,” a Pentagon spokesperson said in a statement. . ."

____________________________________________________________________________

Update 5:40 pm EDT: Microsoft and Amazon have both commented on the nixed contract.

"We understand the DoD’s rationale, and we support them and every military member who needs the mission-critical 21st century technology JEDI would have provided," Toni Townes-Whitley, Microsoft's President of US Regulated Industries, wrote in a blog post.

"The DoD faced a difficult choice: Continue with what could be a years-long litigation battle or find another path forward. The security of the United States is more important than any single contract, and we know that Microsoft will do well when the nation does well. Because the security of the United States through the provision of critical technology upgrades is more important that any single contract, we respect and accept DoD’s decision to move forward on a different path to secure mission-critical technology."

Amazon had a different take on the matter, of course. “We understand and agree with the DoD’s decision," an AWS spokesperson said to Ars. "Unfortunately, the contract award was not based on the merits of the proposals and instead was the result of outside influence that has no place in government procurement. Our commitment to supporting our nation’s military and ensuring that our warfighters and defense partners have access to the best technology at the best price is stronger than ever. We look forward to continuing to support the DoD’s modernization efforts and building solutions that help accomplish their critical missions.”

 
==========================================================================
 
RELATED EARLIER CONTENT ON THIS BLOG
 
March 2018
The Insider
DOD plans to release second draft solicitation for JEDI cloud
March 26, 2018 | Justin Doubleday 
 
The Defense Department plans to release a second draft request for proposals for the Joint Enterprise Defense Infrastructure (JEDI) cloud competition in April after the first draft received more than 1,000 comments.
The single-award strategy has proven controversial, with many companies and industry associations arguing DOD should use multiple awards for services that are expected to be used throughout the department.
In a March 24 update to the Federal Business Opportunities website, the JEDI cloud team announced it had received 1,089 comments from 46 vendors, two associations and three government agencies on the first draft RFP released March 7.
"We appreciate industry's participation in the draft solicitation process and are confident that these inputs will help us to refine and clarify the requirement," the posting states. "DOD remains committed to a transparent process. To that end, the JEDI Cloud team intends to release answers to all previously submitted comments/questions along with a second draft solicitation package for additional comment during the week of April 9."
DOD still plans to release the final RFP in early May, the notice adds.

The Pentagon is planning the JEDI contract as a single, indefinite-delivery, indefinite-quantity award to provide cloud services DOD-wide, officials told companies during a March 7 industry day held to unveil the first draft RFP.
 
The Pentagon says Microsoft should still get its $10B JEDI contract following an investigation
___________________________________________________________________________
First some background context from previous posts on this blog:
26 October 2019
A Win For The Cyber Warfare War-Fighter: Microsoft Snags A Big $10B Pentagon Contract for JEDI
JEDI - Joint Enterprise Defense Infrastructure. As conceived, JEDI is meant to unite the entire U.S. military — virtually every fighter on the ground, every ship at sea, and every jet in the air within a single data framework.
AN ENTERPRISE CLOUD SOLUTION, but just hold on to your laser sabers, guys > The JEDI contract process continues to be under investigation by the DoD inspector general and stuck in federal court.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Every media outlet in The Universe has their stories
This one is taken from Federal Times 
IT and Cloud Report
Amazon or Microsoft? DoD picks a winner for its controversial JEDI contract
"Microsoft won the contract for the Department of Defense’s enterprise cloud, potentially worth $10 billion over 10 years, the Pentagon announced Oct. 25.The tech giant won the award over Amazon Web Services, just three days after Secretary of Defense Mark Esper recused himself from the award after months of review because his son worked for IBM. Amazon was widely considered by industry to be the front runner for the award. . .
This award is an important step in execution of the Digital Modernization Strategy
The DoD cloud strategy called for a multi-cloud, multi-vendor strategy, but industry has had concerns that the award will lead to vendor lock-in. . . "