Tuesday, March 29, 2022

STIGMATIZED INFAMOUS SITE 17: A Relic of Downtown Bulldozing + Bad Urban Land-Use Planning

Intro: It was and is a recurring wrecking-ball wreck leaving behind a vacant 27-acre scar all in the name of urban renewal when the city of Mesa seized the properties using Eminent Domain.
It was a futile attempt to "whitewash" segregation in the neighborhood named North Town, next to Rendezvous Park.
However it came to be known as The Mesa Verde Resort Debacle
30 years ago the City of Mesa spent $6,000,000 to demolish a neighborhood that created a "wrecking-ball nightmare.
This public statement made last year:
"The City of Mesa wishes to transform 27 acres of city-owned land at the SWC of University and Mesa Drive into 'a vibrant and cohesive urban mixed-use project' and is requesting a partner to help with that vision . . ."
NICE SPIN ON THAT LIP-SERVICE at the same time city officials were talking with Salt Lake City developers for years.
According to the RFQ, “At 27-acres, this site would be the largest parcel to be developed in the downtown area and could be the largest single development opportunity within downtown for many years to come.”
 
 
 
 
 
 

featured top story

Can city boondoggle be a downtown boon?

   

City planners laid out their vision of how residential, commercial and office space would be distributed on the downtown site. (City of Mesa) +

Boondoggle

 Updated

"Mesa City Council hopes this is the year to finally turn a downtown boondoggle into a boon for downtown. Council recently heard the latest development plan for 27 acres of city-owned land just north of Main Street near Phoenix Marriott Mesa that Mesa acquired through eminent domain, leveling 63 homes at a taxpayer cost of $6 million.

=========================================================================

INSERT: Streaming video upload of the actual City Council Study Session

INSERT: Excerpt from earlier post

WHAT HAPPENED?

Developer Requested to Transform Mesa Site

 

=========================================================================

If Mesa succeeds in bringing the long-dreamed redevelopment into reality with the city’s latest partner on the project, Miravista Holdings, it would make the third decade the charm for a prime piece of real estate that has long sat vacant.

The city started purchasing property at the southwest corner Mesa and University Drives in 1996 and eventually acquired homes through eminent domain in order to make way for a 12-story water-park resort proposed by a Canadian developer.

But the planned Mesa Verde water resort died after the developer failed to secure funding.

Since then, city planners have envisioned different types of projects for Site 17, as it’s been known, and hoped one developer after another would take up the mantle; but those deals all fell through. . .city planners are hoping 2022 is the year an agreement with a developer leads to shovels in the ground. 

> Last year, the city signed a nine-month “exclusive dealings agreement” with Miravista Holdings to create a master plan for the parcel, which commands a critical location that is in walking distance from downtown attractions, light rail and the Arizona State University campus.

> Officials appeared cautiously optimistic that the multi-phase, mixed use development concocted by Miravista and architectural firm Gensler will come to fruition and keep the redevelopment project only on the drawing board for a fourth decade. . .

Downtown Transformation Manager Jeff McVay said the city has extended its memorandum of understanding with Miravista to continue working on the plan with the goal of signing a development agreement by Aug. 29.

. . .The plan is divided into eight sections that can be developed in any order after the initial phase.

“The remaining blocks have the flexibility to be developed in partnership with you as opportunities arise, as the market dictates,” Ayers said. “Really, the city has the opportunity to control that process for the most part.”

. . .If the city signs a deal with Miravista in August, the company would be required to purchase the first two blocks of land within a year of council approval and complete construction within two years of purchase. . .

TWO QUOTATIONS ARE INCLUDED:

City Manager Chris Brady “We’ve always thought of this site as a support and complement in strengthening downtown. The idea is we didn’t want this to compete with what’s already downtown, . .Downtowns, to be successful, need to have that residential vibe, that 24-hour vibe, not just during the workday.”

Hizzoner the Mayor (Giles put it more bluntly): “What downtown needs is people,” . . .“I have been sitting in this room talking about this piece of property since the 1990s, . .I’m very anxious to see a shovel go in the ground.”

> Miravista plans two neighborhood information meetings next month to share details of the plan. It will hold an in-person meeting Thursday, April 7, and a virtual meeting Monday, April 4. Miravista said notification letters went out to neighbors at the end of last week. 

. . Besides describing the master plan, McVay also sketched out the outlines of a development agreement with Miravista for council members.

> Miravista would have to follow timelines for getting the first phase done, and also set aside money for the city to do “restoration” if the project fails for some reason.

> The city, for its part, would sweeten the deal for Miravista by giving it the opportunity to significantly offset the cost of the land.

> The city would agree to reimburse Miravista up to 75% of the land purchase price for what appear to be modest public improvements in the master plan, such as a “linear park” along the southern edge of the property on 2nd Street, and “enhanced streetscape improvements” to Hibbert and 2nd Street.

The linear park would be the beginning of a “connected network of shaded space” through the development, Ayers said.

> The city would also agree to consider temporary tax waivers on certain development blocks within the master plan deemed to offer particular public benefits. The state allows cities to waive property taxes for up to eight years for developments located in a designated Central Business District that meet other specified criteria.

Council members appeared satisfied that Miravista’s plan has the potential to inject energy into downtown Mesa, but the optimism was tempered by caution, knowing how many false starts the site has seen. . ."

RELATED CONTENT ON THIS BLOG

11 May 2021

Holey Holdings! Sizzle or Fizzle

Don't know if you noticed or not but Miravista Holdings LLC happens to be all over some places in Mesa.
Miravista Holdings (https://www.miravistaholdings.com/ ) is a boutique development firm specializing in Brownfield redevelopment, urban infill, and adaptive re-use projects.
Here's a story from three weeks ago - curiously enough featuring former Mesa Mayor Scott Smith and his "vision" for that now long-time vacant downtown urban redevelopment wrecking-ball disaster infamous Site 17: What to do with Site 17?
SPOTLIGHT
Site included big-splash resort plan that fizzled

 

More > An answer seems to be at hand now with the emergence of Miravista/SIHI Holdings LLC as the city-approved developer for the land. The vision, endorsed by the City Council on April 5, is a mixed-use project with a heavy emphasis on health care and research, residential and other business components
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

> Scott Smith, who served as Mesa’s mayor 2008-14, believed Site 17 eventually would find its own solution.

In a 2013 interview, Smith said the city – having already waited that long – was willing to wait a while longer.

“We’re going to let things happen organically,” Smith said. 

He figured the arrival of light rail in downtown Mesa in 2015 would hasten the process, and suggested the acreage might become home to one or more of the colleges that had committed to building campuses in Mesa around that time.

Transform 17 | City of Mesa

That didn’t happen, either. 

> > >

The current mayor, John Giles, adopted Smith’s approach to developing Site 17, referring to it in 2018 as a “long-term play” whose final outcome should be worth the wait. With the agreement approved on April 5, Giles and the rest of the council seem to believe that moment is at hand

 

 

 

=========================================================================

18 January 2019 and 18 November 2016

The Infamous Site 17: Downtown Mesa's Biggest Urban Eyesore/Downtown Development Wreck 

This is a reminder - a strong reminder and a call-to-action - to GET INVOLVED in fixing this 30-year old scar in the downtown landscape and to WATCH OUT for the Mesa Grande/ANA (Action Neighborhood Alliance)


Here's an excerpt from a post on this blog site two years ago:
18 November 2016

Here We Go Again With That "Downtown Vision Thing"
Who wants to go here to take Mesa to the next level? Is this what works for Mayor John Giles or is there another direction?
At tonight's Mesa City Council Study Session for Monday, Nov 21, 2016,one item stands out on the Final Agenda, but first some background to put things into perspective . . .
16 years later fast-forward to this Monday, November 21, 2016 where Director of Downtown Transformation, Jeff McVay, will be making a presentation of the results of months of online surveys and community meetings to a study session of the Mesa City Council. Real estate developers' perspectives are included also.
16 years ago demolition bulldozed the site, with reporter Gary Nelson calling the 30 acres " a vast scar of empty real estate" in an article from 3 years ago. . .
Link to another post 20 Oct 2018 > https://mesazona.blogspot.com/2018/10/infamous-site-17-urban-eminent-domain.html

_________________________________________________________________________
It's the result of bad urban planning when city officials only listened to real estate developer speculation schemes that demolished more than 60 homes to destroy a neighborhood leaving 27 acres vacant, ugly and un-used and it's city-owned. City officials now own the damage done and have hired a group of consultants who tried to transform a part of downtown Gilbert's Heritage Area.
The history here on this infamous site - and all the problems - simply cannot be ignored now. . . Jeff McVay, the city's so-called "Director of Downtown Transformation" failed miserably two years wasting time-and-money on citizen input sessions that got nowhere.
Did the community already provide input on this site?
_________________________________________________________________________
BLOGGER NOTE: I only attended one of the workshops two years ago, observing the domination and control by the Mesa Grande/ANA (Action Neighborhood Alliance).
Likewise, once again, at the Steering Committee the same complaint was voiced for actions by the Mesa Grande/ANA (Action Neighborhood Alliance)
_________________________________________________________________________
 Yes! There were two community meetings and a survey conducted in the summer of 2016. After those meetings, Mesa City Council asked that a consultant be hired to create conceptual master plans for the property with more community input. The consultant, Crandall Arambula, was hired in September 2018 and has received all of the input from 2016 for review.

This is their promise to fulfill the ____ contract:
“We will provide the Mesa community with maximum value for investment. We are passionate about assisting communities through our depth of experience and research, and we are committed to the long-term success of this project. The measure of that success will ultimately be the development of a vibrant community that is harmonious with greater Downtown Mesa. We look forward to working with you.”
_________________________________________________________________

What makes your MesaZona blogger turn red is this statement just a few days ago made by Mesa Mayor John Giles: 
"The city is not in the business of owning remnant, undeveloped pieces of properties, . . . " 
WTF????

How wrong can Giles get spouting bullshit like that with blinders on when Site 17 has been an ugly eyesore for more than 30 years. He sees only what he wants to see and lacks any vision whatsoever unless it's fed to as bait.
___________________________________________________________________________

Here's a link to the workshop six weeks ago where attendees were told to only submit written comments: https://www.mesaaz.gov/about-us/city-projects/downtown-transformation/university-mesa 
Slick-and-slippery: The Process
Univeristy & Mesa Dr project schedule
________________________________________________________________________________

 

Here's a  Press Release just now from the City of Mesa Newsroom
Mon 20 Oct 2018
Community workshops for southwest corner of University Drive and Mesa Drive

October 29, 2018 at 12:45 pm

The City of Mesa wants to hear your ideas about the southwest corner of University Drive and Mesa Drive. The community is invited to participate in two hands-on workshops to establish project goals and provide input in the creation of master plan concepts for the 27 acres of undeveloped land in Downtown Mesa. . .
Public Information and Communications
Contact: Kevin Christopher
Tel. 480-644-4699
kevin.christopher@mesaaz.gov 


Scroll down this post to read the presser in its entirety
________________________________________________________________________
Hold on just a minute! Didn't Jeff McVay, the Director of Downtown Transformation do this two years ago?
Link > https://mesazona.blogspot.com/2016/11/mesa-city-council-study-session-for.html#more
Known to the City as “Redevelopment Site 17,” the tract once contained 63 homes that the City condemned and purchased at a cost of $6 million.  A group of Canadian developers planned to build Mesa Verde, an entertainment village featuring a time-share resort, water park and ice-skating rink.
After the City had already seized the homes, financing for the project fell through.
[2]  Now, 16 years later, the City is still considering possible redevelopment plans for the area.[3] . . . what's the current thinking and planning that's been put into an attempt to gather data from online surveys and two community meetings involving 1,873 people?

 

16-1223 Hear a presentation on the community and developer outreach efforts and provide direction on the future development of the approximately 25 acres of City-owned land located at the southwest corner of University and Mesa Drives.
Here's a link to the Presentation - it's 29 pages
: http://mesa.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=2884066&GUID=43ABE4CD-209F-444D-A994-DEEBB3FFA60C

Jeffrey McVay, AICP Manager of Downtown Transformation
Jeffrey Robbins, CPM Management Asst. II
Lucia Lopez Marketing and Comm. Specialist II

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Monday, March 28, 2022

Is the war in Ukraine ushering in a new world order? | Inside Story

IN THE LONG HAUL: Government bonds on track for worst year since the Marshall Plan was enacted

Intro: Woooooo-Hoodooo!
The class of negative yielding bonds has quietly vanished, from some $18 trillion down to less than $2 trillion.
The previous bond bear markets were from 1899 to 1920, and from 1946 to 1981.
All In One Chart                   

Government bonds on track for worst year since the Marshall Plan was enacted

'Eyebrow Raising Thing To Do': Roberts Worries About Political Ramificat...

Mesa City Council Meeting Mon 03.21.2022

Less than 18 minutes that's all the public face-time it took for Hizzoner John Giles to express disappointment that his choice of apparel didn't produce any 'wardrobe comments' when he's sporting a casual Chicago Cubs polo shirt... perhaps other councilmembers can take a cue from the mayor and start sporting their own personal choices for dress codes. It could be a new trend.
In case you have no idea what the meeting agenda was, you can find it here >> https://mesa.legistar.com/Calendar.aspx
There was another study session in the same week on Thursday 03.24
There's also another Mesa City Council meeting on Thu 03.31 but there's no agenda yet made available to the public
One item on this meeting's agenda was a spotlight top story on infamous Site 17 highlighted in a story by Mesa Tribune reporter Scott Shumaker
 
Please click or hover on the streaming YouTube video produced by Mesa TV - there's an Awards Ceremony for Diversity in Mesa that includes the city's token Hispanic district rep.

 

 

A TELLING LEAK FROM LOYALTY SWITCH TO TAIWAN: GREAT POWER RIVALRY IN THE PACIFIC

Intro: A leaked draft security agreement being negotiated between China and Solomon Islands could have security implications for the whole Pacific.
The draft document sets out a broad framework covering Chinese “police, armed police, military personnel and other law enforcement and armed forces” deployments to Solomon Islands.
The agreement also allows China, with the consent of Solomon Islands, to make ship visits, provide logistical support and have stopovers and transition in Solomon Islands

A security agreement between China and Solomon Islands could impact stability in the whole Pacific

Australia must figure out how to respond to an increasingly crowded Pacific, without increasing tensions in the region
By Mihai Sora /Research Fellow in the Pacific Islands Program at the Lowy Institute, and a former Australian diplomat to Solomon Islands.
Solomon Islands prime minister Manasseh Sogavare and Chinese premier Li Keqiang
‘The regional order is changing rapidly … Australia cannot, and does not, expect to be the only security partner for Pacific countries.’ Photograph: Wang Zhao/AFP/Getty Images
Fri 25 Mar 2022 19.00 EDT Last modified on Sat 26 Mar 2022 11.46 EDT
 
". . .A bilateral agreement such as the one proposed between China and Solomon Islands undermines that sentiment and shows a limited appreciation for security of the region as a whole by whomever was the leaked draft’s initial author. . .The ambitious scope of this draft agreement is further evidence of China’s strategic intent in the Pacific. Whether or not China will ultimately be able to establish a permanent military base in Solomon Islands is not yet certain – if anything, this is the first step of many towards such a goal. The leaked document is an early draft . . .
[. ] The scope of the agreement allows China to provide security assistance to major projects. With more than 90% of Solomon Islands’ extractive resources by weight going to China in 2019, and a slew of major infrastructure projects being promised by Chinese state-owned enterprises in the country, such an agreement could be tied to Sogavare’s attempt to deliver on his promise of increased economic benefits to Solomon Islands arising from the switch. . ."

The regional order is changing rapidly and will look very different over the next 10 years.

 
RELATED CONTENT

US to reopen Solomon Islands embassy amid moves to counter China

Washington promises more diplomatic and security resources to the South Pacific region as China’s influence grows

US Secretary of State Antony Blinken

The announcement comes as US Secretary of State Blinken visits Fiji for talks with Pacific island leaders [Kevin Lamarque/AFP]
 
 
"US Secretary of State Antony Blinken has confirmed the United States plans to open an embassy in the South Pacific nation of Solomon Islands in an effort to counter China’s influence in the politically troubled Pacific Islands.

The announcement on Saturday comes as Blinken visits Fiji for talks with Pacific Islands leaders, with Washington promising more diplomatic and security resources to the region.

In a notification to Congress, the State Department said Solomon Islanders cherished their history with Americans on the battlefields of World War II, but that the US was in danger of losing its preferential ties as China “aggressively seeks to engage” elite politicians and business people in the Solomon Islands. . .

The US previously operated an embassy in the Solomons for five years before closing it in 1993. Since then, US diplomats from neighbouring Papua New Guinea have been accredited to the Solomons, which has a US consular agency.

The embassy announcement fits with a new Biden administration strategy for the Indo-Pacific that was announced on Friday and emphasises building partnerships with allies in the region as a way to counter China’s growing influence and ambitions.

The State Department said China had been “utilising a familiar pattern of extravagant promises, prospective costly infrastructure loans, and potentially dangerous debt levels” when engaging with political and business leaders from the Solomon Islands.

“The United States has a strategic interest in enhancing our political, economic, and commercial relationship with Solomon Islands, the largest Pacific Island nation without a US embassy,” the State Department wrote.

The State Department said it did not expect to build a new embassy immediately but would at first lease space at an initial set-up cost of $12.4m. The embassy would be located in the capital, Honiara, and would start small, with two US employees and about five local staff.

> The State Department said the Peace Corps was planning to reopen an office in the Solomon Islands and have its volunteers serve there, and that several US agencies were establishing government positions with portfolios in the Solomons.

“The Department needs to be part of this increased US presence, rather than remaining a remote player,” it wrote.

Blinken arrived in Fiji on Saturday after visiting the Australian city of Melbourne where he had a meeting with his counterparts from Australia, India and Japan.

THE QUAD: The four nations form the so-called “Quad”, a bloc of Indo-Pacific democracies that was created to counter China’s regional influence.

In Fiji, Blinken plans to meet Pacific Islands leaders to discuss the climate crisis, the coronavirus pandemic and disaster assistance. It was the first visit by a US secretary of state to Fiji since 1985."

 
 
 

 

Chinese Ambassador Reveals China's Position in Russia Ukraine War

GREGORY BOVINO: Nazi Cosplay Time in Mineeapolis...Trump's ICE Enforcer

  UPDATE ON SUNDAY 25 JANUARY 2026 Top stories Federal agents fatally shoot Alex Pretti in Minneapolis Star Tribune Fact check: Video, witne...