Friday, August 04, 2023

Arsenic Exposure via Contaminated Water and Food Sources

People who live in areas with naturally high levels of arsenic in the soil and water are at particular risk. In the U.S., for example, that includes regions in the Southwest such as Arizona, Nevada and New Mexico. Additionally, human activities such as mining and agriculture can also increase arsenic in food and water sources. 

Arsenic is a naturally occurring element found in the Earth’s crust. Exposure to arsenic, often through contaminated food and water, is associated with various negative health effects, including cancer.
Arsenic exposure is a global public health issue. A 2020 study estimated that up to 200 million people wordwide are exposed to arsenic-contaminated drinking water at levels above the legal limit of 10 parts per billion set by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and World Health Organization. More than 70 countries are affected, including the United States, Spain, Mexico, Japan, India, China, Canada, Chile, Bangladesh, Bolivia and Argentina.

erica's water crisis

A series on the challenges many in the US face getting access to safe, clean, affordable water, and the injustices to those most at risk
1 day ago — Arsenic is a naturally occurring element found in the Earth's crust. Exposure to arsenic, often through contaminated food and water, is associated with ...
6 days ago — Contamination of soil and groundwater with cadmium is a global problem affecting food and drinking water supplies mainly in Asia and Africa [17].

Dowsing for danger

Arsenic is a metabolic poison that is present in minute quantities in most rock materials and, under certain natural conditions, can accumulate in aquifers and cause adverse health effects. Podgorski and Berg used measurements of arsenic in groundwater from ∼80 previous studies to train a machine-learning model with globally continuous predictor variables, including climate, soil, and topography (see the Perspective by Zheng). The output global map reveals the potential for hazard from arsenic contamination in groundwater, even in many places where there are sparse or no reported measurements. The highest-risk regions include areas of southern and central Asia and South America. Understanding arsenic hazard is especially essential in areas facing current or future water insecurity.
Science, this issue p. 845; see also p. 818

Abstract

Naturally occurring arsenic in groundwater affects millions of people worldwide. We created a global prediction map of groundwater arsenic exceeding 10 micrograms per liter using a random forest machine-learning model based on 11 geospatial environmental parameters and more than 50,000 aggregated data points of measured groundwater arsenic concentration. Our global prediction map includes known arsenic-affected areas and previously undocumented areas of concern. By combining the global arsenic prediction model with household groundwater-usage statistics, we estimate that 94 million to 220 million people are potentially exposed to high arsenic concentrations in groundwater, the vast majority (94%) being in Asia. Because groundwater is increasingly used to support growing populations and buffer against water scarcity due to changing climate, this work is important to raise awareness, identify areas for safe wells, and help prioritize testing.
The natural, or geogenic, occurrence of arsenic in groundwater is a global problem with wide-ranging health effects for humans and wildlife. Because it is toxic and does not serve any beneficial metabolic function, inorganic arsenic (the species present in groundwater) can lead to disorders of the skin and vascular and nervous systems, as well as cancer (12). The major source of inorganic arsenic in the diet is through arsenic-contaminated water, although ingestion through food, particularly rice, represents another important route of exposure (3). As a consequence, the World Health Organization (WHO) has set a guideline arsenic concentration of 10 μg/liter in drinking water (4).
At least trace amounts of arsenic occur in virtually all rocks and sediments around the world (5). However, in most of the large-scale cases of geogenic arsenic contamination in groundwater, arsenic accumulates in aquifers composed of recently deposited alluvial sediments. Under anoxic conditions, arsenic is released from the microbial and/or chemical reductive dissolution of arsenic-bearing iron(III) minerals in the aquifer sediments (69). Under oxidizing, high-pH conditions, arsenic can also desorb from iron and aluminum hydroxides (10). Furthermore, aquifers in flat-lying sedimentary sequences generally have a small hydraulic gradient, causing groundwater to flow slowly. This longer groundwater residence time allows dissolved arsenic to accumulate and its concentration to increase. Other processes responsible for arsenic release into groundwater include oxidation of arsenic-bearing sulfide minerals as well as release from arsenic-enriched geothermal deposits.
That arsenic is generally not included in the standard suite of tested water quality parameters (11) and is not detected by the human senses means that arsenic is regularly being discovered in new areas. Since one of the greatest occurrences of geogenic groundwater arsenic was discovered in 1993 in the Bengal delta (51213), high arsenic concentrations have been detected all around the world, with hot spots including Argentina (1417), Cambodia (1819), China (2022), India (2325), Mexico (2627), Pakistan (2829), the United States (3031), and Vietnam (3233).
To help identify areas likely to contain high concentrations of arsenic in groundwater, several researchers have used statistical learning methods to create arsenic prediction maps based on available datasets of measured arsenic concentrations and relevant geospatial parameters. Previous studies have focused on Burkina Faso (34), China (2135), South Asia (2936), Southeast Asia (37), the United States (313839), and the Red River delta in Vietnam (33), as well as sedimentary basins around the world (40). The predictor variables used in these studies generally include various climate and soil parameters, geology, and topography (table S3).
Taking advantage of the increasing availability of high-resolution datasets of relevant environmental parameters, we use statistical learning to model what to our knowledge is the most spatially extensive compilation of arsenic measurements in groundwater assembled, which makes a global model possible. To focus on health risks, we consider the probability of arsenic in groundwater exceeding the WHO guideline. For this, we have chosen the random forest method, which our preliminary tests showed to be highly effective in addressing this classification problem. We use the resulting model to produce the most accurate and detailed global prediction map to date of geogenic groundwater arsenic, which can be used to help identify previously unknown areas of arsenic contamination as well as more clearly delineate the scope of this global problem and considerably increase awareness.

Results

Random forest modeling

We aggregated data from nearly 80 studies of arsenic in groundwater (see table S1 for references and statistics) into a single dataset (n > 200,000). Averaging into 1-km2 pixels resulted in more than 55,000 arsenic data points for use in modeling based on groundwater samples not known to originate from greater than 100-m depth (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1 Arsenic concentrations, excluding those known to originate from a depth greater than 100 m.
Values are from the sources listed in table S1. The geographical distribution of data is indicated by continent.
Arsenic Contamination Of Food And Water Is A Global Public Health Concern  Researchers Are Studying How It Causes Cancer
_________________________________________________________________________

Arsenic Exposure via Contaminated Water and Food Sources

Received: 23 May 2022 / Revised: 7 June 2022 / Accepted: 8 June 2022 / Published: 11 June 2022

Abstract

Arsenic poisoning constitutes a major threat to humans, causing various health problems. Almost everywhere across the world certain “hotspots” have been detected, putting in danger the local populations, due to the potential consumption of water or food contaminated with elevated concentrations of arsenic. According to the relevant studies, Asia shows the highest percentage of significantly contaminated sites, followed by North America, Europe, Africa, South America and Oceania. The presence of arsenic in ecosystems can originate from several natural or anthropogenic activities. Arsenic can be then gradually accumulated in different food sources, such as vegetables, rice and other crops, but also in seafood, etc., and in water sources (mainly in groundwater, but also to a lesser extent in surface water), potentially used as drinking-water supplies, provoking their contamination and therefore potential health problems to the consumers. This review reports the major areas worldwide that present elevated arsenic concentrations in food and water sources. Furthermore, it also discusses the sources of arsenic contamination at these sites, as well as selected treatment technologies, aiming to remove this pollutant mainly from the contaminated waters and thus the reduction and prevention of population towards arsenic exposure.
 Figure 1 shows the various routes of arsenic and arsenic-related compounds that can accumulate in an ecosystem due to anthropogenic activities, resulting in environmental deterioration.
Figure 1. Pathways through which arsenic and its relevant compounds may enter the environment and contaminate soil, atmosphere and water. Human and natural activities result in As accumulation, mainly in soil and water, where As(V) and As(III) are interconverted via oxidation and reduction bio/reactions. The respective methylated products can be produced from As(III) species, i.e., MMA, DMA and TMA, resulting in the formation of MMAA, DMAA and TMAA chemical compounds, mainly through volatilization, while the reverse process occurs through demethylation.

7. Conclusions

Arsenic concentration in food and drinking water above the maximum permissible concentration limit is a common water pollution problem in both developed and developing countries. 
  • The exposure to higher concentrations of arsenic may be life threatening. 
  • Water sources for drinking, such as surface water or groundwater, and food sources, such as fish, crops and cereals, can play a notorious role in exposing humans to arsenic. 
  • According to the literature, intense arsenic contamination is mainly attributed to mining and erosion activities, affecting mainly groundwater and surface water. 
  • By using arsenic-contaminated water for irrigation, the pollution problem can be transferred to the produced vegetation. In this case, most studies are focused on rice, as this crop requires large amounts of water for cultivation and, 
  • in addition, it is consumed in large quantities in highly populated areas. 
  • Similarly, through water, arsenic can accumulate in fish, mainly from freshwaters, and in other marine species, especially mussels. 
  • Taking into account these problems, the continuous monitoring of arsenic levels in water and food sources is mandatory in the future, allowing the application of proper treatment/removal process and the prevention of humans from arsenic intake.
REFERENCE: MDPI
__________________________________________________________________________

_

New Report from The War Zone: Some Strange Things in Arizona's Military Training Ranges

It should be noted up front that not all of the reports about incidents in the skies over U.S. military training areas in Arizona during the 2020-2023 timeframe are necessarily notable, at least based on the information currently in hand. Some part of the uptick in overall incidents can be explained by the growing prevalence of consumer-grade drones, something that has appeared in other similar data sets in the past.  
At the same time, a number of the incidents that the FAA and the Air Force documented in the past three years include details that are very attention-grabbing.

Pilots Are Seeing Some Very Strange Things In Arizona’s Military Training Ranges

U.S. fighter jets are having worrisome aerial encounters in Arizona’s restricted air combat training areas, which fits with a broader trend.

BYJOSEPH TREVITHICKTYLER ROGOWAY|
Unidentified Arizona training ranges
Image credit: VFRMap.com/USAF.

> Encounters with small unidentified "objects," sometimes in swarm-like groups of as many as eight. Sightings of other objects, including some characterized as drones, flying at altitudes up to 36,000 feet and as fast as Mach 0.75. Another apparent small drone actually hitting the canopy of an F-16 Viper causing damage. 
  • These incidents and many more, all occurred in or around various military air combat training ranges in Arizona since January 2020.

The events are described in reports from the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) filed over roughly a three-year period. 

  • Overall, the data points to what are often categorized as drones, but many of which are actually unidentified objects, as well as what do appear to be drones, or uncrewed aerial systems (UAS), intruding into these restricted warning areas with alarming regularity.

A US Air Force F-35A Joint Strike Fighter, in the foreground, flies together with an F-16C Viper in the skies over Arizona. USAF
A US Air Force F-35A Joint Strike Fighter, in the foreground, flies together with an F-16C Viper in the skies over Arizona. USAF

Marc Cecotti, a contributor to The War Zone, has been able to obtain additional partially redacted reports about a number of these incidents from the U.S. Air Force's Safety Center via the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) that provide additional insights.

Cecotti, together with Adam Kehoe, another one of our contributors, had first begun to notice a clustering of reports of unusual aerial encounters in southwestern Arizona back in 2021. 


An interactive online tool they created for The War Zone that leverages the FAA's public database of drone-related incident reports helped highlight that trend.

The Reports

There have been a number of encounters between military aircraft and what are described as groups of craft flying together in the past three years or so in this specific part of the United States. . . .

A map showing the approximate locations of clusters of reports made to the FAA between 2016 and 2020 of encounters between military aircraft and unidentified uncrewed aerial systems (UAS) with unusual flight characteristics. <em>Marc Cecotti/Adam Keyhoe/The War Zone</em>
A map showing the approximate locations of clusters of reports made to the FAA between 2016 and 2020 of encounters between military aircraft and unidentified uncrewed aerial systems (UAS) with unusual flight characteristics. Marc Cecotti/Adam Keyhoe/The War Zone

Arizona Is Host To Major Air Combat Training Areas

When it comes to the Air Force, Arizona is home to Luke Air Force Base and Davis-Monthan Air Force Base. 

Luke has long been a major training hub for U.S. Air Force and foreign F-35 and F-16 pilots, though its work with the F-16 has been steadily diminishing in recent years. 

Davis-Monthan currently hosts units flying a variety of aircraft, including A-10 Warthog ground attack jets and EC-130H Compass Call electronic warfare planes, as well as the unit that oversees the U.S. military's famous boneyard that is part of the sprawling installation.

Arizona has a number of major training ranges with restricted airspace, including significant areas adjacent to Luke AFB and MCAS Yuma. 

  • In fact, a large swathe of Arizona's border with Mexico sits under these ranges, including the Barry M. Goldwater range. 
  • There are a number of other designated Military Operating Areas (MOA), which can readily, if temporarily be closed off for training, elsewhere in the state. 
  • Restricted airspace and MOAs are all included in what the FAA more broadly refers to as Special Use Airspace (SUA).

A map showing designated restricted airspace (outlined in red) and MOAs (outlined in purple) used for military training in Arizona and neighboring states. <em>DOD</em>
A map showing designated restricted airspace (outlined in red) and MOAs (outlined in purple) used for military training in Arizona and neighboring states. DOD
A VFR map of southwestern Arizona that also various Special Use Airspace (SUA) zones. <em>VFRmap.com</em>
A VFR map of southwestern Arizona that also various Special Use Airspace (SUA) zones. VFRmap.com

The reports of unidentified objects, especially the ones involving groups of them flying together, are particularly interesting given the surge in interest in recent years in what are now often referred to as unidentified aerial phenomena (UAP), but have previously been more commonly known as unidentified flying objects (UFO).

Members of Congress are increasingly pushing for more declassification and general transparency from the U.S. military and Intelligence Community on these matters. These calls from legislators have only grown in the wake of allegations of a massive coverup from intelligence official and Air Force veteran turned whistleblower David Grusch, which you can read more about here.


... 

A growing national security and flight safety problem

The War Zone has pointed out in the past how reports about incidents involving UAPs, drones, and other things, such as balloons, are clearly being passed through multiple U.S. military reporting streams
The Chinese spy balloon, as seen from the cockpit of an Air Force U-2S Dragon Lady spy plane, which was subsequently shot down. <em>USAF</em>
The Chinese spy balloon, as seen from the cockpit of an Air Force U-2S Dragon Lady spy plane, which was subsequently shot down. USAF
The incidents involving the balloon and other 'objects' also revealed that the U.S. military, in particular, was not necessarily attuned to certain kinds of lower-end aerial threats, including literally when it came to what kinds of data its air defense radars were set up to collect.
  • Radars and other sensors may be part of another possible emerging trend based on what we're seeing from the FAA logs and newly released HATR reports. This has to do with the sensitivity of the F-35's sensor suite coupled with its immense data fusion capabilities. 
  • The War Zone has previously pointed out that a growing number of UAP reports from Navy pilots in the past two decades may well be tied, at least in part, to the introduction of newer, more sensitive active electronically scanned array (AESA) radars to the mix through the fielding of later block F/A-18E/F Super Hornet fighter jets and the new E-2D Hawkeye airborne early warning and control aircraft.
Especially without having more details about the final investigations into these incidents, this also raises questions about whether advanced sensors suites on the F-35 and other U.S. military aircraft may also be picking up things and not necessarily categorizing them correctly, in at least some instances.
At the same time, the F-35, in particular, has immediate additional ways to help positively identify any object of interest, including its Distributed Aperture System (DAS) and Electro-Optical Targeting System (EOTS). The jet's powerful electronic intelligence gathering (electronic support measures or ESM) suite is also a factor. 
  • The jet's AN/APG-81 radar, DAS, EOTS, and its ESM system can work together to detect, track and engage targets. Those targets can be detected in the infrared or radio frequency spectrum. If one sensor detects something either passively or actively, all those sensors can be immediately brought to bear on the target. 
  • This would all point to a significant amount of data being collected in encounters involving Joint Strike Strike Fighters even in the absence of direct visual (eyeball) confirmation. 
  • Older fighters also commonly carry targeting pods now that can be slaved to the jet's radar for long-range visual identification of aerial targets, as well. 
  • Even more advanced sensors are hitting the fleet, which you can read more about here.

If nothing else, the publicly available FAA logs together with the newly released Air Force data point to an increasing number of worrisome and potentially dangerous encounters with drones and other unidentified aerial objects. This includes ones that are clearly a very real hazard, as proven by the mid-air collision between the F-16 and the drone, in heavily trafficked military airspace in Arizona.

This adds to previous evidence that military training ranges on the east and west coasts of the United States have been focal points for increasing encounters with drones and other unidentified objects in the past decade. 

All this begs the question, what are these things, some of which are seen in groups or with high-performance capabilities, doing in America's sensitive training ranges? Where are they coming from? In the case of the Arizona events, are some of them flying across the Mexican border? 

The data also serves as further proof that this issue, in relation to America's sensitive domestic aerial training ranges, extends well beyond what has occurred in the warning areas off America's coasts.

You can take a look at all the documentation discussed in this report here and here.

Contact the author: joe@thedrive.com and tyler@thedrive.com


CONTINUE READING

Maricopa County asking residents for help to improve air quality

 




Race-to-Space >> China’s LATEST Satellites Launch Touches New Height