Monday, August 22, 2016

Cities for People, Not Just Cars | Brent Toderian | Walrus Talks

Reconsider traffic infrastructure . . .
Published on Aug 9, 2016
Views: 57
 
From The Walrus Talks Resilience (Saskatoon 2015)

Re | Big Data, Cloud & Internet of Things


 

Fast-changing, human-driven events like expansion of cities and creation of assets for transportation are very vulnerable to old data. Any person who has been misled by car navigation systems can testify to the fact that the digital road network on their device is often out of date and does not show new features.
The need of the hour therefore is for speed of data delivery and crunching.
Where does this data come from and how can it be used in real-time or near-real-time for decision making?
Find out for yourself in this month’s Geospatial World magazine.
The Continuum: Big Data, Cloud & Internet of Things

If geospatial systems have to remain relevant in a fast-changing world, then data sources that go beyond imagery and maps must become a part of the analysts’ armory. Big Data, its analytics in the Cloud and the final Internet of Things are what the future holds.

Q: How many big data scientists does it take to screw in a lightbulb? A: Just a minute. Let me run the algorithm


Natural resources as well as social, political and economic activities have a strong bearing on the outcome of projects such as growth of cities, building of infrastructure and even a farmer’s decision to plant a specific crop. If geospatial systems have to remain relevant in a fast-changing world, then data sources that go beyond imagery and maps must become a part of the analyst’s armory.
Enter the world of Big Data, Big Data Analytics and Internet of Things.

More data is not always more intelligent data

“The rate at which we are generating data is rapidly outpacing our ability to analyze it,” says Dr. Patrick Wolfe, Data Scientist at the University College of London. “The trick here is to turn these massive data streams from a liability into a strength.” The extent to which we are missing extraordinarily valuable data analytic opportunities is incredible: right now, only 0.5% of our information is analyzed. We have more data, but it is not always more intelligent data. Part of the problem with Big Data is that it is not valuable until it is understood. “You have to start with a question and not with the data,” stresses Andreas Weigend, Lecturer at UC Berkeley. “The fact that data gets collected is a good thing,” he adds, but what we really need is to figure out what problems we can solve with it.. . ."
“Our world is ever changing and fresh and dynamic applications that are a combination of content, workflow, analytics and experience can be used in any area of application where we need to sense this change,” elaborates Atanu Sinha, Director, Hexagon Geospatial, India & SAARC. Hexagon, for instance, already has Smart M.Apps to analyze green space, road areas, crime incidents, snow cover, forest burn ratio, iron oxide index in rocks, crop health, UAV data processing and so on.

Read more >> http://www.geospatialworld.net/article/the-continuum-big-data-cloud-and-internet-of-things/
 

Sunday, August 21, 2016

Real Future: Predictive Policing (Episode 12)


Published on Mar 24, 2016
Views: 105,555
From citizens capturing police brutality on their smartphones to police departments using surveillance drones, technology is changing our relationship to the law.

One of the newest policing tools is called PredPol. It's a software program that uses big data to predict where crime is most likely to happen, down to the exact block. Dozens of police departments around the country are already using PredPol, and officers say it helps reduce crime by up to 30%. But some skeptics are worried that despite its futuristic promise, PredPol and similar tools might inflame relationships between local police departments and communities of color.

In this episode of REAL FUTURE, Alexis Madrigal visits the Santa Cruz Police Department, where officers are already using PredPol to augment their old-fashioned police work. And he asks: as crime-fighting goes digital, is there a risk of relying too heavily on an algorithm?

Watch REAL FUTURE on Fusion (Mondays at 10 p.m. Eastern), or on Apple TV or Roku.

More REAL FUTURE episodes:
http://www.realfuture.tv

PredPol: What Is It?

Official Police Business: Does predictive policing actually work?    
Crime forecasting tools are taking off, but good data is hard to find
By Matt Stroud on    @MattStroud
  
Official Police Business is a weekly column and newsletter by reporter Matt Stroud about new developments in police technology, and the ways technology is changing law enforcement think body cameras, cell-site simulators, surveillance systems, and electroshock weapons. Sign up to receive OPB in your email every Wednesday at officialpolicebusiness.com, or check for it here at The Verge.

Hunchlab's predictive policing, explained
Video >>  https://volume.vox-cdn.com/embed/ae6a05d46?placement=article&tracking=article%3Amiddle&player_type=null&start_time=null#ooid=VsM3FtMDE6nBxlgrY9L3T-H8BJkYGv4m

Predictive policing is everywhere . . . private company PredPol is supposedly helping police to identify where property crimes and robberies might occur. As those cities’ predictive programs have gotten more and more attention, police chiefs have done their best to get in on the action. . .
But does predictive policing actually work?
One study —touted seemingly every time a police department decides to contract with PredPol — shows that PredPol’s software can lead to a 7.4 percent reduction in "crime volume."
But that study was carried out by two of PredPol’s founders, P. Jeffrey Brantingham, and George Mohler, who sit on the company’s board of directors.
> What’s more, a French researcher replicated that study and found that police could get the same results if they sent officers to crime hotspots instead of paying to use predictive software.
It’s with similar skepticism that Andrew Ferguson, a law professor at the University of the District of Columbia, decided to take a hard look at predictive policing. In a paper titled "Policing Predictive Policing," forthcoming in the Washington University Law Review, Ferguson provides perhaps the most comprehensive critique of predictive policing yet published. His goal: encouraging lawmakers to scrutinize technology that "has far outpaced any legal or political accountability and has largely escaped academic scrutiny."
After delving into the history of predictive policing and the literature that’s studied it, Ferguson lays out an exhaustive list of "vulnerabilities" that any official should consider before signing onto a so-called predictive program. Those vulnerabilities include questions about how the Big Data feeding these programs are gathered; how those data are used; who’s accountable for how the predictive tools influence policing; how those tools are implemented; and more. To cite his most basic example: if crimes are reported in a specific geographic location, that doesn’t necessarily mean more crimes are happening there — or that crimes aren’t happening elsewhere. It could mean that police tend to be stationed nearby, or that police specifically target that area, or that people there tend to call-in crimes more frequently. But predictive software has no way of knowing that, and can thus lead to a self-fulfilling prophecy. Ferguson quotes former Electronic Frontier Foundation attorney Hanni Fakhoury: "[I]f the data is biased to begin with and based on human judgment, then the results the algorithm is going to spit out will reflect those biases."
Though predictive policing is spreading to police departments all over the world and "there is no real hope of going back," he writes, officials need to understand what they’re signing up for before they contract with PredPol, HunchLab, or any other company selling the Minority Report police solution.
There’s still not a ton of literature about the effectiveness of predictive policing. (There’s only really been one independent study; it was conducted by RAND researchers and its results were inconclusive.) But as Ferguson pointed out to me in an email last week, officials need someone other than police chiefs and company representatives to tell them about whether predictive policing works. "My hope was [this article will be] handed to mayors and city council members when someone proposes buying a predictive policing system."
. . . We’ll see if that’s the case.

Source: http://www.theverge.com/2016/5/4/11583204/official-police-business-predictive-policing-paper
  

Mesa City Council Meeting Tomorrow: Contract Authorizations for over $8 Million Dollars

Mesa City Council Meeting Final Agenda
Monday, August 22, 2016


Complete agendas and calendar schedule links can be found here >> http://mesa.legistar.com/Calendar.aspx



5 Take action on the following contracts

*5-a 
3-Year Term Contract @ $262,500 annually = $787,500
16-0864 Three-Year Term Contract for Uniform Garments for Citywide Use as requested by the Business Services Department (Citywide)
Through this contract, the City purchases and issues garments to certain job classifications.  Items include:  t-shirts, polo shirts, and jeans; poly/cotton and cotton uniform shirts and pants; and jackets, hats and ball caps.  Departments using this contract include Business Services, Energy Resources, Fleet Services, Parks, Recreation and Community Facilities, Environmental Management and Sustainability, and Water Resources.
The Business Services Department and Purchasing recommend authorizing a contract with International Corporate Apparel, Inc. (ICA); and Mission Linen Supply; at $262,500 annually, based on estimated requirements.

*5-b

3-Year Term Contract @ $476,500 annually = $1,429,500
16-0851 Three-Year Term Contract for Streetlight and Traffic Signal Poles, Mast Arms and Anchor Bolts for the Materials and Supply Warehouse (for the Transportation Department) (Citywide)
This contract will provide streetlight and traffic signal poles, mast arms and anchor bolts.  Streetlight and traffic signal poles are used for maintenance/replacement of existing poles as well as to be supplied to the contractor when the Transportation Department constructs smaller projects in-house.
The Business Services and Transportation Departments, and Purchasing recommend awarding the contract to the lowest, responsive and responsible bidders:  A & M Nut and Bolt, Inc.; Cem-Tec Corporation; and Valmont Industries, Inc.; cumulatively not to exceed $476,500 annually, based on estimated requirements.

Page 4 City of Mesa Printed on 8/18/2016
August 22, 2016City Council Meeting Agenda - Final


*5-c
3-Year Term contract @ $57,300 annually = $171,900
16-0852 Three-Year Term Contract for Spray Marking Paint for the Materials and Supply Warehouse (for various City Departments) (Citywide)
This contract will provide various types of spray marking paint for the City of Mesa and the City of Chandler.
The Business Services Department and Purchasing recommend awarding the contract to the lowest, responsive and responsible bidder, Arizona Water Works Supply, at $57,300 annually, based on estimated requirements.

*5-d
3-Year Term Contract @ $200,000 annually = $600,000
16-0853 Three-Year Term Contract for Siemens Ruggedized Switches for the Transportation and Information Technology Departments (Citywide)
This contract supports the planned lifecycle replacement of network switches that provide connectivity for remote sites for the City’s SCADA (Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition) environment as well as Transportation ITS (Intelligence Transportation System). 
These ruggedized switches also provide the security management and monitoring controls needed to mitigate security vulnerabilities and address communication errors occurring in current, aging devices.  
The Transportation and Information Technology Departments, and Purchasing recommend awarding a contract to the lowest, responsive and responsible bidders: TESSCO Incorporated; and L4 Technologies, LLC; cumulatively not to exceed $200,000 annually, based on estimated requirements.

*5-e
$250,000 annually
16-0857 Term Contract for Groundskeeping Materials for the Parks, Recreation and Community Facilities Department (Citywide)
This contract will provide groundskeeping materials such as fertilizer, pesticide, herbicide, grass seed and other related items.
The Parks, Recreation and Community Facilities Department and Purchasing recommend authorizing a Term Contract using the City of Tucson cooperative contract through the National Intergovernmental Purchasing Alliance with J.R. Simplot Co., dba Simplot Partners, at $250,000 annually, based on estimated requirements.

Page 5 City of Mesa Printed on 8/18/2016
August 22, 2016City Council Meeting Agenda - Final


*5-f
One-year Term Contract $150,000
16-0855 One-Year Term Contract for Reagents and Supplies for DNA Analysis for the Police Department (Sole Source) (Citywide) 
This contract will provide for ongoing purchases of the consumable reagents and supplies for the Biology Unit’s DNA analysts to complete DNA extractions and process DNA samples.
The Police Department and Purchasing recommend awarding the contract to the sole source vendor, QIAGEN, Inc., at $150,000 annually, based on estimated requirements.


*5-g

3-year Term Contract = $91,680
16-0856 Term Contract for License Plate Reader Software for the Police Department (Initial Purchase grant funded by the Arizona Automobile Theft Authority and Attorney General’s Office Settlement Funds) (Citywide)
This purchase will provide a web-based license plate national vehicle location service/license plate reader software for the Police Department’s East Valley Gang and Criminal Information Fusion Center.  This license plate recognition system allows Fusion Center personnel access to data related to license plate reader scans.  This analytic software will provide investigative and real-time support to the Mesa Police Department and partner agencies, allowing queries without the initial cost of purchasing a license plate reader camera system.
The Police Department and Purchasing recommend authorizing a contract using the City of Tempe cooperative contract with Vigilant Solutions, at $31,680 for the initial purchase; and $30,000 annually for years 2 and 3 for the annual subscriptions, based on estimated requirements.


*5-h

3-Year Contract = $170,200
16-0861 Three-Year Term Contract for Predictive Policing Subscription for the Police Department (Sole Source) (Citywide)
This contract will provide services, resources and tools to support a successful implementation of Predictive Policing (PredPol) services to support the City’s efforts to suppress, deter and reduce crime. 

PredPol software will provide easy to use predictions for where and when property crime, drug crime, gun violence, gang activity and traffic incidents are most likely to occur based on historical data, current crimes and mathematical modeling.
The Police Department and Purchasing recommend awarding the contract to the sole source vendor, PredPol; year 1 at $60,400; and years 2 and 3 at $54,900 annually, based on estimated requirements. 

The one-time setup fee of $5,500 and an annual subscription fee of $54,900 (for the first three years) are funded by the Asset Forfeiture (RICO) Funds.

Page 6 City of Mesa Printed on 8/18/2016
August 22, 2016City Council Meeting Agenda - Final


*5-i a
4-year contract for $127,000 annually = $508,000
16-0858 Four-Year Term Contract for a Consolidated Equipment Maintenance Program for the Police Department (Citywide)
This contract will provide a forensics equipment maintenance management program that will reduce the number of contracts in place, allow for additions and deletions of equipment, track repair requests and monitor equipment performance.  By consolidating 22 pieces of forensics equipment under one contract, the City will realize an anticipated 20% decrease in maintenance costs ($28,251). 
The Police Department and Purchasing recommend authorizing a contract using the State of Arizona cooperative contract with Specialty Underwriters, at $127,000 annually, based on estimated requirements.


*5-j

1-Year Renewal Contract $446,000
16-0854 One-Year Renewal of the Term Contract for Bio-Solids Removal and Reuse/ Disposal Services for the Water Resources Department (Citywide)
This contract provides for all materials, equipment and labor to load, transport, and reuse/dispose of dewatered bio-solids from Mesa’s Northwest and Greenfield Water Reclamation Plants.  Bio-solids dewatered during the previous 24-hours are removed from the plant site daily. The Greenfield Water Reclamation Plant expansion should be near completion in 2018.  Due to this expansion, the amount of bio-solids to be removed will significantly increase and the City intends to re-bid this contract next year. 
The Water Resources Department and Purchasing recommend authorizing a one-year renewal with Denalli Water Solutions, LLC, at $460,000, based on estimated requirements.


*5-k
Purchase of Security Cameras $43,648.96
16-0860 Purchase of 13 Security Cameras for Electric Utility Substations for the Energy Resources Department (Citywide)
This purchase will furnish and install 13 security surveillance cameras at 4 electric utility substations in Mesa:  Fraser Substation; Lewis Substation; Robson Substation and Kellwood Substation.  The contractor will supply the cameras, associated hardware, equipment, labor, tools, materials and testing required to complete the installation among the four electric substations.
The Energy Resources Department and Purchasing recommend awarding the contract to the lowest, responsible and responsive bidder, Goserco, Inc., at $43,648.96.

Page 7 City of Mesa Printed on 8/18/2016
August 22, 2016City Council Meeting Agenda - Final



*5-l
$24,277.44
16-0859 Purchase of Two Cargo Trailers for the Transportation Department (Citywide)
This contract will provide two enclosed cargo trailers:  one 8’ x 20.5’ and one 8’ x 16.5’ that will be used to support Transportation’s daily operations. 

The additional purchases on this existing contract will exceed the purchasing threshold and now requires Council approval.
The Fleet Services and Transportation Departments, and Purchasing recommend authorizing the purchase from the contract with Verde, Inc., at $24,277.44. 

This purchase is funded by Local Streets Sales Tax.
*5-m
$1,875,661.45 + change order allowance $187,566
16-0848 Falcon Field Airport Realign and Construct Taxiway ‘C’ and Runway ‘4R’ Run-up Area (District 5)
On July 11, 2016, Council accepted an Airport Improvement Program Grant Agreement from the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) that provides 91.06% of the necessary construction funding for this project. 

This project will enhance safety at Falcon Field by re-aligning the intersection of Taxiway ‘C’ with the approach end of Runway ‘22L’.  The project will also reconfigure the Aircraft Run-Up Area at Runway ‘4R’ to remove direct access from Falcon Ramp to the runway by introducing directional changes.
Staff recommends the project contract to the lowest, responsible bidder, J. Banicki Construction, Inc., in the amount of $1,875,661.45, and authorizing a change order allowance in the amount of $187,566. The FAA grant will fund 91.06% of the total estimated cost, with local matching funds required for the remaining 8.94%.  Falcon Field has applied to the Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT) for a matching grant to fund 4.47% and the Airport Enterprise Fund will fund the remaining 4.47%. If an ADOT grant is not received, Falcon Field will fund the entire local match of 8.94%, from the Falcon Field Capital Program.


*5-n

$2,130,937.96
16-0849 Val Vista Water Transmission Main Project - Phase 3 (District 1)
The City has initiated a three-phase project to build a new water transmission main to deliver water from the Val Vista Water Treatment Plant. 

The new Val Vista Water Transmission Main will serve as a dedicated water main for Mesa to fulfill the requirements of an Intergovernmental Agreement with the City of Phoenix.  This contract is the second Guaranteed Maximum Price (GMP) for construction of the third phase of the project.  
Staff recommends awarding the second GMP to Garney Construction in the amount of $2,130,937.96, which includes a 3% contingency for approved change orders.  Funding is available from the 2014 authorized Water Bonds.

Heads Up! The Clock Is Ticking: Early Voting Ends This Friday August 26

Early voting for the Aug. 30 Arizona Primary Election began on Aug. 3 and ends on Aug. 26.

Voters on the Permanent Early Voting List and voters wishing to receive an early ballot who are not registered with a declared political party must contact Maricopa County Elections at (602) 506-1511 to request which ballot they want to receive (Republican, Democrat, Green or non-partisan if it is a ballot for Mesa City candidates only).
Voters, not registered with a party, who plan on going to the polls to vote can request the ballot they want upon arrival at the polling site.
Voters may use the Mesa City Clerk's Office Aug. 3 through Aug. 25 to vote in person.
The office is located at Mesa City Plaza, 20 E. Main St., Suite 150.
Office hours: Mon-Thu only from 7 a.m. to 6 p.m.
 
As of August 4, 2016, the City Clerk's Office will now serve as a ballot drop-off site Monday, Aug. 29 and Tuesday, Aug. 30 (Election Day).
 
On Election Day, you may drop off your ballot at the Clerk's Office or at any of the following locations near Mesa City Plaza, before 7:00 p.m.:
 
American Legion Post #26
505 W. 2nd Avenue
Mesa, AZ 85210
 
First Presbyterian Church
161 N. Mesa Drive
Mesa, AZ 85201

Maricopa County Recorder's Southeast Mesa Office
222 E. Javelina Ave.
Mesa, AZ 85210

For more information, call the Mesa City Clerk's Office at (480) 644-4868 or visit www.mesaaz.gov/city-hall/city-clerk.

Anyone Interested How Planning & Zoning Works? Clue = It Is Complicated

 
This post if mostly cut-and-dry and detailed to illustrate the multiple facets of what goes on at PZ meetings, study sessions and hearings. The tentative and final agendas are listed on a meetings calendar you can find on mesaaz.gov .
Here's a link >> http://mesa.legistar.com/Calendar.aspx
Condensed below are five pages taken from published agendas, with hard copies available at the meetings as well as a sign-in sheet.
Individual items on agendas have links to the documents and maps associated with each for you to either download or open prior to scheduled meeting times, viewing the materials and plans can take hours! What "average citizen" can really do that??

Nonetheless, your MesaZona blogger took the time on Tue 16 August 2016 to go to the 7:30a.m. PZ Study Session the day before a public hearing took place [didn't attend, but anyone can watch a video-on-demand for the hearing ].
The Agenda for the Tuesday Study Session caught my eye for a presentation that was on the published agenda the day before for a Downtown Mesa Update Presentation by Jeff McVay that, as it turned out didn't happen - it was postponed, rescheduled to be heard at the Sept 20, 2016 Study Session.
You gotta have extraordinary patience to get this: take the time to scan over the items and then watch the video-on-demand for the public. 
On the day before what did happen was a review of the items on the tentative agenda for the next day's regular PZ Board Hearing whose final agenda [5 pages] is shown below - the same items.
[Readers should note that all the board members are nominated by the mayor and approved by the Mesa City Council.]
Staff planners, and John Wesley Powell, were on one side and board members on the other facing each other in the front of Room 170 at City Hall. There was a lively give-and-take on all the agenda items I had the time to listen to, noting that Tim Boyle and Steve Ikeda were the most engaged with the staff planners

These are the Items on the final consent agenda the next day: [13]
  • 3 Zoning cases *3-a through *3e reviewed were for an assisted living facility, a medical facility, a 3.1-acre single-residential subdivision, a 9+-acre light industrial development and associated storage yards, a 365 plus/minus-acres to establish a Development Unit Plan for Unit 5 North @ Eastmark,
  • 4 Discussion and recommendations to the City Council were made on the following zoning cases *4a through *4-c for: a 1.67-acre development for development of 16 attached single residences within a multi-residential district, a 15-acre development of a multi-residential project, and a 1.16-acre for an outpatient surgical facility.
  • 5 Discussion and action on preliminary plats *5-a through *5-e  for: 17+-acre Sunland Spring [condos], a 1.67-acre for Pasadena Estates, a 2.7-acre for Villa Rialto II, a 3.1-acre for Diamond Court, and a 9-acre Red mountain Business Park

6 Items not on the consent agenda: Take action on
   6-a Rezone and Site Plan Review for a 2.7-acre multi-residential development


City of Mesa Planning and Zoning Board - Public Hearing
Meeting Agenda - Final

Wed 17 August 2016

Chair Michael Clement

Vice Chair Michelle Dahlke
Board members:
Dane Astle

Steve Ikeda
Jessica Sarkissian
Jennifer Duff
Tim Boyle

Consent Agenda - All items listed with an asterisk (*) will be considered as a group by the Board and will be enacted with one motion. 

There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Boardmember or citizen requests, in which the item will be removed from the consent agenda, prior to the vote, and considered as a separate item.     
Items on this agenda that must be adopted by ordinance and/or resolution will be on a future City Council agenda. 


Anyone interested in attending the City Council public hearing should call the Planning Division at (480) 644-2385 or review the City Council agendas on the City's website at www.mesaaz.gov to find the agenda on which the item(s) will be placed.
Call meeting to order.
1 Take action on all consent agenda items.
Items on the Consent Agenda

2 Approval of minutes from previous meetings.
PZ 16203 Minutes from the July 19, 2016 and July 20, 2016 Study Sessions and Regular Hearing


*2-a
Page 1 City of Mesa Printed on 8/16/2016
August 17, 2016Planning and Zoning Board - Public Hearing Meeting Agenda - Final


3 Take action on the following zoning cases: [5]

   3 Approved with conditions, 2 continued to Sept 21 meeting

*3-a

PZ 16193 Z16-037 District 1. 2810 North Val Vista Drive and 3558 East McDowell Road.  Located at the northwest corner of McDowell Road and Val Vista Drive.  (1.69± acres).  Site Plan Review.  This request will allow development of an assisted living facility. (PLN2016-00379). 
Staff Planner:   Jennifer Gniffke Staff Recommendation:   Continuance to the September 21, 2016 Meeting

  
*3-b
PZ 16194 Z16-038 District 1. 1310 through 1322 East McKellips Road. Located east of Stapley Drive on the north side of McKellips Road. (2.16 ± acres).  Site Plan Review.  This request will allow development of a medical facility.  (PLN2016-00321). 
Staff Planner:   Kaelee Wilson Staff Recommendation:   Approval with Conditions 


*3-c
PZ 16195 Z16-040 District 6.  The 600 block of South Signal Butte Road (west side).  Located south of Broadway Road on the west side of Signal Butte Road.  (3.1± acres). Rezoning from RS-43 to RSL-3.0 PAD and Site Plan Review. This request will allow for the development of a single-residential subdivision (PLN2016-00377). 
Staff Planner:   Tom Ellsworth Staff Recommendation:   Continuance to the September 21, 2016 Meeting

  
*3-d
PZ 16196 Z16-041 District 5.  The 3200 through 3400 block of North Higley Road (west side).  Located south of the Loop 202 Red Mountain Freeway on the west side of Higley Road. (9 ± acres).   Site Plan Review. This request will allow for a light industrial development and associated storage yards. (PLN2016-00327). 
Staff Planner:   Tom Ellsworth Staff Recommendation:   Approval with Conditions 


*3-e
PZ 16197 Z16-042 District 6.  The 9600 to 10400 blocks of East Elliot Road (south side). Located on the south side of Elliot Road and east of Ellsworth Road. (365± acres).  Development Unit Plan Review. This request will establish a Development Unit Plan for Development Unit 5 North of the Eastmark (Mesa Proving Grounds) Community Plan. (PLN2016-00504). 
Staff Planner:   Kim Steadman Staff Recommendation:   Approval with Conditions

 

Page 2 City of Mesa Printed on 8/16/2016
August 17, 2016Planning and Zoning Board - Public Hearing Meeting Agenda - Final


4 Discuss and make a recommendation to the City Council on the following zoning cases: [9]

7 Approvals with conditions, 2 continued to Sept 21 meeting

*4-a
PZ 16189 Z16-035 District 4. 500 block of South Pasadena (east side), between 521 and 551 South Pasadena excluding 525, 531, 537, but including the property behind (east of) those three addresses.  Located south of Broadway Road and west of Mesa Drive. (1.67 ± acres).   Rezoning from RM-2 and RM-3-PAD to RM-2-BIZ and Site Plan Review. This request will allow development of attached single residences within a multi-residential district (PLN2016-00278).  
Staff Planner:   Andrew Spurgin  Staff Recommendation:   Approval with Conditions


*4-b
PZ 16190 Z16-034 District 6. 3117 South Signal Butte Road with a connection south of East Pampa Avenue to the future extension of South Willow Wood.  Located south of Guadalupe Road and east of Signal Butte Road.  (15 ± acres).  Rezoning from RS-6-PAD to RM-2-PAD-PAD and Site Plan Review.  This request will allow development of a multi-residential project. (PLN2015-00306).    
Staff Planner:   Lesley Davis  Staff Recommendation:   Approval with Conditions


*4-c
PZ 16191 Z16-036 District 1.  2626 East University Drive. Located west of Lindsay Road on the north side of University Drive.   (1.16± acres).  Rezoning from OC-PAD to NC-PAD, PAD Modification and Site Plan Review.  This request will allow repurposing of the existing building to an outpatient surgical facility.  (PLN2016-00486). 
Staff Planner:   Andrew Spurgin Staff Recommendation:   Approval with Conditions


*4-d
PZ 16192 Z16-039 District 6. 7800 block of East Baseline Road (north side). Located east of Sossaman Road on the north side of Baseline Road.  (2.7 ± acres).  Rezone from RS-6 and OC to RM-3-PAD and Site Plan Review.  This request will allow a multi-residential development. (PLN2016-00376). 
Staff Planners:   Andrew Spurgin and Lesley Davis Staff Recommendation:   Approval with Conditions

 
Page 3 City of Mesa Printed on 8/16/2016
August 17, 2016Planning and Zoning Board - Public Hearing Meeting Agenda - Final


5 Discuss and take action on the following preliminary plats:



*5-a
PZ 16198 "Sunland Springs Village”. District 6. 3117 South Signal Butte Road with a connection south of East Pampa Avenue to the future extension of South Willow Wood.  Located south of Guadalupe Road and east of Signal Butte Road.  (17 ± acres).  Preliminary Plat.  Tim R. Nielsen, Farnsworth Construction Co., applicant; RAF Investments, LLC, Guadalupe/Signal Butte 36 Investments LLLP, Sunland Springs Apts LL, Meridian Prop, ETAL, owners. (PLN2015-00306).    Companion case to Z16-034
Staff Planner:  Lesley Davis Staff Recommendation: Approval with Conditions


*5-b
PZ 16199 "Pasadena Estates”.  District 4.  500 block of South Pasadena (east side), between 521 and 551 South Pasadena excluding 525, 531, 537, but including the property behind (east of) those three addresses.  Located south of Broadway Road and west of Mesa Drive. (1.67 ± acres).   Preliminary Plat.  Bruce Tulley, Trapezium Consulting Group, applicant; Kevin Zirk, CFZ Development LLC, owner.  (PLN2016-00278).  Companion case to Z16-035
Staff Planner:  Andrew Spurgin Staff Recommendation:  Approval with Conditions


*5-c
PZ 16200 "Villa Rialto II”.  District 6.  7800 block of East Baseline Road (north side). Located east of Sossaman Road on the north side of Baseline Road.  (2.7 ± acres).  Preliminary Plat.  Reese L. Anderson, Pew and Lake, PLC, applicant; Light in the Desert Baptist Church and Baseline Road Southern Baptist Church, owners.  (PLN2016-00376). Companion case to Z16-039 
Staff Planner:  Andrew Spurgin and Lesley Davis Staff Recommendation: Continuance to the September 21, 2016 Meeting


*5-d
PZ 16202 "Diamond Court”. District 6.  The 600 block of South Signal Butte Road (west side).  Located south of Broadway Road on the west side of Signal Butte Road. (3.1± acres).  Preliminary Plat.  Sean Lake, Pew and Lake, PLC, applicant; Leon Rick’s, Ricks Investments, owner.  (PLN2016-00377).  Companion case to Z16-040
Staff Planner:   Tom Ellsworth Staff Recommendation:   Continuance to the September 21, 2016 Meeting

  
*5-d
Page 4 City of Mesa Printed on 8/16/2016
August 17, 2016Planning and Zoning Board - Public Hearing Meeting Agenda - Final


PZ 16201 "Red Mountain Business Park”. District 5 The 3200 through 3400 block of North Higley Road (west side).  Located south of the Loop 202 Red Mountain Freeway on the west side of Higley Road. (9 ± acres).   Preliminary Plat.  Corey Smith, DCSJ, LLC, applicant; Higley Land Investments, owner.  (PLN2016-00327). Companion case to Z16-041
Staff Planner:  Tom Ellsworth Staff Recommendation:  Approval with Condition
s