Sunday, March 05, 2017

Falcon Field Capital Improvement Program

Falcon Field Airport plans and implements continuous improvements  to ensure a safe, pleasant experience for pilots and users and to improve the aesthetic appearance of the airport.
Projects are included in the approved Falcon Field Airport Master Plan and five-year Capital Improvement Program (CIP).
http://www.falconfieldairport.com/about-us/documents-forms
For projects that are grant eligible, Falcon Field must coordinate with other City of Mesa departments as well as the Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT) and the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on funding and construction schedules, so the airport does not have sole discretion on project timing. However, every effort is made to coordinate with airport businesses and tenants to minimize impacts.
The City of Mesa and contractors work to complete projects as quickly as possible while minimizing inconvenience to airport users. As with any construction projects, weather and unforeseen circumstances can cause delays.

D-1 Run-Up Area Realignment Project
The project to realign the D-1 run-up area is scheduled to begin  Monday, January 9, 2017. This realignment is required for the Airport to meet new FAA standards to reduce runway incursions and to improve safety.
The new FAA standard does not allow aircraft to have straight direct access from the ramp to the runway.  This project will consist of adding two islands in the D-1 run up area that will require pilots to make directional turns after a run-up and before proceeding to the hold short line of the runway. In addition, there will be six holding bay configurations along Taxiway D where pilots can conduct aircraft run-up operations.
This project will be phased (see diagram above).

Initially, the green area will be barricaded off and pilots will be able to use the run-up area at the D-1 taxiway connector (blue shaded area).  After the initial phase (green shaded area) is complete, it will be opened and the run-up area to the west (blue area) will be closed.  Taxiway D from D-2 to D-3 will be closed.  Pilots will be able to access Runway 4R via D-3 for an intersection departure or back taxi operation, or taxi on the ramp through to the D-1 run up area

New Non-Movement Boundary Location Change
In order to meet new FAA safety standards, the aircraft run-up area by Taxiway D-1 has been realigned. As part of this realignment, the non-movement area boundary line has been relocated (the marking which identifies the requirement to have tower permission to cross). To the right is an airfield diagram that identifies the new location of the non-movement area boundary line.
To ensure safety, it is critical that any person, ground vehicle, or aircraft contact the air traffic control tower for permission prior to crossing the non-movement boundary line. If a person, vehicle, or aircraft crosses the non-movement line without tower permission, it is classified as an incursion and the FAA will investigate the incident.
Please use caution when operating near the new realignment by the run up area at D-1, as the location of the non-movement area boundary line is in a new location.
If you have any questions or concerns, please contact Bradley Hagen, A.A.E. Airport Projects & Operations Supervisor, at 480-644-4230 or brad.hagen@mesaaz.gov.

  
4-1 History of Falcon Field Airport 
In 1940, the United Kingdom was deeply entrenched in war with Germany.  Two issues were pressing to Winston Churchill and the British: 1) Lack of trained pilots and 2) Airfields to train the recruits.   Churchill turned to the United States to help them with these problems.  In response the US military designated seven airfields to train Royal Air Force (RAF) pilots.  Since the United States was technically neutral to the war in Europe at this time, the RAF pilots were sent by trains to the Arizona desert in civilian clothing to avoid drawing attention.   
Construction of the airfield commenced on July 17, 1941, roughly 7 miles from the City of Mesa boundary at the time.  City Engineer, E.B. Tucker, conducted a contest to name the field. It was from this contest that the name “Falcon Field” was chosen. Some of the other entries were Superstition Field, Saguaro Field, and Sun Valley Field.   
The training was to be conducted by Southwest Airways (no connection to present-day Southwest Airlines).  In fact, the flying falcon on the Falcon Field logo came from the shoulder patches on Southwest Airways uniforms.  To pay for the training, the British government was charged $21.60 for primary training, $32.70 for basic training, and $25 a month for room and board. 

More than 1,500 pilots trained in the skies over Mesa until September 11, 1945 when the last of the RAF pilots left for England.   
After the war was over, the airfield was turned over the to the City of Mesa for one dollar.  The City of Mesa technically did not have the Falcon Field Airport inside the city boundary until 1978 when it was annexed into the city. 

The remainder of the territory came into the City of Mesa in a series of seven annexations that spanned the years of 1978-1984.  
Another milestone for this area is also in the year 1984 - this is when the first AH-64 Apache Attack Helicopter rolled out of the Hughes Helicopter factory.  Hughes Helicopter eventually became Boeing, providing an anchor for the area as an aviation center for the entire Phoenix area. 
Sixty-five years after the initial construction, Mesa’s Falcon Field Airport ranked among the nation’s “top 10” general aviation airports in terms of based aircraft and handles more than 270,000 flight operations annually (Falcon Field Employment Center Strategy Plan). 

Falcon Field Airport ranked third in terms of economic impact in the state of Arizona behind Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport and Tucson International Airport

Surrounding Areas 
Located in North East Mesa, the Falcon Field Airport enjoys advantageous access to views of Red Mountain, the Red Mountain Freeway (Loop 202), and US-60.  On the east, west, and southwest, airport operations are limited, but not impeded by existing single-family residential development. 

This essential and scarce operational space will have to be carefully protected for its current and future operations.   
Of particular note is the proximity of the airport to the Citrus Sub-Area. 

Buffering of its existing residential areas will need to be a consideration for future airport operations and area development. 
In particular, consideration will need to be given in relation to land use impacts, activity based impacts, and the preservation of the character of this neighboring Sub-Area. 
The airport also enjoys proximity to a large amount of vacant land that is mostly planned and zoned for industrial and business park uses. 

The majority of this land is on the airport property, immediately to the west, and to the north. 
This is an asset that permits tremendous future opportunity to influence the character of the area. 
This also presents a tremendous opportunity for direct and indirect economic and business linkages that can generate a large number of jobs.  
Existing industrial developments, such as Boeing, have a strong association with the airport, providing a number of economic anchors that will ensure the long-term viability of the airport.  However, retail and services establishments necessary to serve the area have only begun to develop in recent years, occupying land to the south of the airport.  


Airport Land 
More than 100 acres are available for development on Falcon Field Airport. 

The property is now being listed and marketed through a broker.  Infrastructure is being planned to provide direct taxiway access to virtually every location on the Airport.  These vacant holdings may be leased and improved with aviation related businesses. 
There is also airport owned property that is located across the street at the northwest and southwest corners of McKellips and Greenfield Roads.

Due to the lack of aviation value for the majority of the parcel at the northwest corner of  McKellips and Greenfield Roads, the City of Mesa will be requesting a release from the Federal Aviation Administration to change the land use from aeronautical to non-aeronautical use.  

Bob Worsley anti 2nd Amendment 02/28/2017


Published on Mar 4, 2017
Views: 5
Unfortunately, Senate Bill 1243 failed by a 14-16 vote on Tuesday. SB 1243 is now dead for the 2017 legislative session, but rest assured, your NRA-ILA will be back next year to fight for the passage of this important legislation. Sponsored by state Senator John Kavanagh (R-23), SB 1243 would have made changes to existing law and would have expanded the list of places where law-abiding gun owners can exercise their fundamental right to self-defense to include some additional public areas where certain security measures are not in place.
https://www.nraila.org/articles/20170...

http://votesmart.org/candidate/141302...

SB1243 02/28/2017

Silent Coup: Obama, FISA, NSA, Deep State vs. President Donald Trump

RAD + Mad Media
Published on Mar 5, 2017
Views: 10,143
Duration: 34:19
It is full-blown McCarthyism front and center. A brutal, ham-fisted and inappropriate use of governmental might and force to subvert an election and the 45th POTUS. Herein I explicate and limn the bill of particulars and gravamen of my indictment against Obama and the Deep State.

This is Not Edited FEAR NOT >> The Fear of Language.

Orwellian?
Published on Mar 5, 2017
Views: 26,272
Pie berates the policing of language and the sensitivity of Uni campuses.

Where Is It? Accurate Data for Public Pension Defenders

SUBJECT: UNFUNDED LIABILITIES
Rob Fellner, the guest opinion writer of an article for Forbes cited in this post, brings up some interesting points in reference to projected budget shortfalls here in the City of Mesa for public employee pensions [including police and fire/medical unions], that were under discussion in last week's City Council meetings.
If you weren't attending the public meetings, or watched the proceedings, check out previous posts on this blogsite. The important thing to keep in mind is that one way or another taxpayers here in Mesa will be footing the skyrocketing costs unless there is some reform in the public pension system.
More discussion is needed, especially around some of the issues in Fellner's reporting and he should know - he's the director of research for TransparentCalifornia, the state’s largest database of public employee pay and pension information.
Now we all know that California and Arizona are way different states of mind, but's it's that 'Transparency Thing' that caught your MesaZona blogger's eye: it's not here yet in the State of Arizona or in the City of Mesa.
Questions that were not asked were
- What are the management fees for the equity firms?
- What are the payouts for retirees? [a huge number of people who retire after 25-31 years]
Yes these payouts are negatively effecting the city's budget
- It is important to accurately state how much public retirees are making
- Feller states that taxpayers in California are paying at least 2-3 times as much for public employees’ pensions than public employees themselves. Is this the case here in Mesa?
For example, California Highway Patrol officers contribute 11.5% of their pay towards pension costs, with taxpayers contributing a historical high rate of 46.7%, which will rise to 50% by 2019.
- Growing pension contributions are also crowding out education spending

Here's an excerpt from Fellner:
Without reform, costs would rise even more
With so much at stake, its unsurprising that the public pension industry funds an organization, the National Institute of Retirement Security (NIRS), to advocate on its behalf. One of NIRS’ main arguments, repeated by Hiltzik, is that “shutting down a pension plan actually costs taxpayers money” due to the loss of contributions from future employees.
Yet employees only pay half of the projected cost for their own, future benefit.
Precisely because taxpayers already bear the entire cost of paying down the unfunded liability, the “changing demographics” argument is invalid.
This is why a recent Mercatus Center study concluded that, “While converting public pension plans won’t make their unfunded liabilities go away, it will prevent the liabilities from getting worse. Arguments for maintaining failing pension systems due to perceived transition costs are not based on empirical reality.”
. . . Finally, Hiltzik cites three states that offered a 401(k)-style alternative and then experienced increased costs for their existing defined benefit plan. Left unsaid was that without reform, costs would have risen further.
If this is the best the public pension industry can offer in their defense, reform might just have a shot after all.

Public Pension Defenders Can't Stand Their Ground If They Used Accurate Data
Guest post written by Robert Fellner
Mr. Fellner is director of research for TransparentCalifornia, the state’s largest database of public employee pay and pension info.
 

Saturday, March 04, 2017

Agenda for Economic Development Advisory Board Meeting

First some pre-notes and comments from your MesaZona blogger who frequently attends and pays attention at these early morning sessions:
1. Once again there is glaring proof that city governance has failed big time in community engagement:  the public: rarely, if ever, show up to express an interest or point-of-view on any item appearing on the agenda.
When I filled out a blue card and spoke to the board a couple of months ago, one member remarked it was the first time in over 10 years that any public input was heard.
2. The published meeting agendas are sketchy - with scant details or links to anything prepared ahead of time either for presentations or discussion details. Is this simply an oversight or lack of effort?
For example: not even a brief outline of what David Luna has in mind for 'discussion'
3. Even though both Mesa City Manager Chris Brady and Mesa Mayor John Giles are ex-officio members by virtue of holding office earning a salary to perform their duties  for their public obligations to citizens, neither one has bothered to show up for at least 6 months.
The last time the mayor attended he promised to be 'a good member' ...for what that's worth
4. By the time meeting minutes do get published, they are more than 2 months old.
That's way too long and hardly timely, transparent, open or accountable.

Meeting Notice & Agenda
Economic Development Advisory Board
City Council Chambers 57 E. 1st Street, Lower Level
Tues 07 March 7 2017 @ 07:30 AM    

1. Chair’s Call to Order
2. Items from Citizens Present
3. Approval of Minutes from February 7, 2016 meeting [11 pages from 05 Jan 2017]
4. Discussion with Vice Mayor Luna 
5. Visit Mesa Update 
6. Falcon Strategic Plan Update
7. Director’s Update
8. Other Business
 Next EDAB Meeting- April 4th  
9. Adjournment


Link to access of approved meeting minutes from 3 months go back in January 2017 >>
http://apps.mesaaz.gov/meetingarchive/meetings?body=EDAB

KEEPING YOU INFORMED: Anyone Here in Mesa Howling About This Yet?

Not just one but two reports in the last two days have put the focus on off-the-field behind-the-scenes speculation flying under the mainstream media radar.This is just early research and who knows what’s going to happen at this point in the Rio Salgado Crossing - will the deal get sealed by crossing the 'T's and dotting the 'I's ??? . . . and who's playing ball?
Just warming-up now in the bullpen of a new media blitz to use a legislative trickery in another play for taxpayer money to finance yet another stadium here in Mesa

BEA News: Gross Domestic Product by State and Personal Income by State, 3rd Quarter 2025

  BEA News: Gross Domestic Product by State and Personal Income by S...