24 February 2024

Ten years after Maidan: Why won’t the West admit that the coup was based on a lie? | RT

This feature was first published on February 6, 2023. On the occasion of the 10th anniversary of the events that took place in Kiev on February 22, 2014, we are again posting it on the front page.

Ten years after Maidan: Why won't the West admit that the coup was based on  a lie? — RT Russia & Former Soviet Union

Ten years after Maidan: Why won’t the West admit that the coup was based on a lie?

Evidence that external forces were involved has been suppressed for ‘political reasons’
Ten years after Maidan: Why won’t the West admit that the coup was based on a lie?


Political scientist Ivan Katchanovski – of the University of Ottawa – revealed last year, in a paper, that the February 2014 massacre of Ukrainian protesters by sniper fire, a defining moment of the Western-backed Maidan coup, was not published by an academic journal for “political reasons.”

‘The evidence is solid’

In a lengthy Twitter thread, Katchanovski first laid out the circumstances behind the rejection of his article, and the bombshell evidence included in it. The paper was initially accepted with minor revisions after peer review, and the journal's editor offered a glowing appraisal of his work, writing:

“There is no doubt that this paper is exceptional in many ways. It offers evidence against the mainstream narrative of the regime change in Ukraine in 2014… It seems to me that the evidence the study produces in favour of its interpretation on who was behind the massacre of the protesters and the police during the ‘Euromaidan’ mass protests on February 18-20, 2014, in Ukraine, is solid. On this there is also consensus among the two reviewers.”

As the editor noted, the massacre was a “politically crucial development,” which led to the “transition of powers in the country” from the freely elected Viktor Yanukovich to the illegitimate and rabidly nationalistic administration of Aleksandr Turchinov, a former security services chief. It was endlessly cited in Western media as a symbol of the brutality of Ukraine’s government and an unprovoked attack on innocent pro-WesternMaidan protesters, who allegedly sought nothing more than democracy and freedom.

Rumors that the killings were a false flag intended to inflame tensions among the vast crowds filling Maidan, and provoke violence against the authorities, began circulating immediately.

RT

No serious investigation into what happened was ever conducted by the Western media, with all claims that the sniper attacks were an inside job dismissed as Kremlin “disinformation.” However, even NATO’s Atlantic Council adjunct admitted in 2020 that the massacre was unsolved and that this “cast a shadow over Ukraine.”

Top stories

Did the U.S. participate in the 2014 coup in the Ukraine that ousted  President Yanukovych? - Quora
Nuland's cookies again: Maidan midwife's plan for US policy on Russia is  dumb, delusional, dangerous — Puppet Masters — Sott.net
How Fictitious "Heavenly Hundred" Was Used to Justify the Coup d'Etat and  Bloodbath in Ukraine - 17.02.2024, Sputnik Africa

No comments:

Ishiba Set to Become Japan's Next PM After Ruling Party Leadership Race Win

  Carnegie Endowment for International Peace Search inside image Russia's Frozen Assets Present a Policy Dilemma | Carnegie Endowment fo...