Saturday, January 07, 2017

Questions Remain About $5Million Investment from 2012 Taxpayer-Approved Parks Bond Debt Issue

Food-for-Thought for New Year 2017:
Are we really seeing any of the so-called "downtown revitalization" that's the rallying cry for the success of the administration of John Giles and his Director of Downtown Transformation Jeff McVay?
A massive top-down mega-million-dollar proposal to radically transform The New Urban Downtown Mesa into a satellite ASU campus that devoured downtown Tempe - featured as the key cornerstone of Giles' plan for NextMesa - blew up big time, rejected by taxpayers.
Sure, Valley Metro Light Rail service started in August of last year after three years of construction along Main Street.
Yes, $100 Million was invested in the international design award winning Mesa Arts Center ten years ago to turn downtown into an Arts-and-Entertainment Mecca.
Mesa was hyped and touted as "a college town" back in 2012 when Scott Smith was mayor after luring out-of-state universities to occupy vacant under-used city-owned properties with lease incentives - three left town, with Benedictine University have some success this year to enroll about 500 students.
Apart from MAC, the world-famous Nile Theater built in 1924 has been a privately-owned mainstay for indoor entertainment for years attracting crowds just like the long-established financially solvent city-owned outdoor venue Mesa Amphitheater adjacent to the Mesa Convention Center. These - and Pop-Up events like MACFest [only operating 14 one-day arts-and-crafts market in 52 weeks], 1st, 2nd and 3rd Fridays every month, and live entertainment at Queens Pizzeria and Desert Eagle Brewery fill out what attracts people to downtown for entertainment. Mesa Musicfest is in year 2.
At least three retail establishments have closed their doors in 2016: Nebula Vaping, Lulubell's Toy Bodega, and Power Pill. A sandwich shop and another coffee house opened, with Jarrod's enlarging the coffeeshop concept with a gallery and lounge area.
Off to a start, but mebbe "sputtering"? Gotta wonder what is next for NextMesa Downtown.
It might be useful looking back in the rear-view mirror at what and how some monies from a 2012 taxpayer-approved Parks bond obligation debt issue got allocated, as well as seeing how one stalled project is getting along, or not, after getting a big focus back in March 2016.
Officials are saying one thing, while Arizona Republic reporter Maria Poletta covers a mixed-bag of interests.

Mesa Historical Museum Makeover:
Will $5M investment pay off?
Maria Polletta , The Republic
azcentral.com 11:13 a.m. MT March 28, 2016
"After nearly a decade of talks, plans to wholly reinvent the Mesa Historical Museum’s mission and image are finally taking off.
Demolition and other prep work is complete at what will be the museum’s new home — the former federal building at 26 N. Macdonald — and extensive renovations are expected to begin this summer. . . ."
Did that happen?
The article continues:
It’s the first step in a sweeping transformation officials say will leave the 50-year-old museum nearly unrecognizable. The institution’s focus, collections and even its name will likely have changed by the time it moves into the new facility, sometime in the next three years.
Although some City Council members have doubted whether the $5 million investment will pay off, given downward trends in museum attendance, voters’ support and museum officials’ persistence have convinced them to give the project a shot.
“As a Mesa native, it's of personal interest to me that a city of our size have a place where we preserve and present our history, both to those of us who have been here a long time and those who are new,” said Brian Allen, a member of the museum board.
“As we all drive by the federal building every day and think of what it could be, we are ready to deliver a world-class museum, a world-class facility … and create a new attraction.” 

‘New and different’??
For decades, the non-profit history museum operated out of Mesa’s 103-year-old Lehi School, on a historically significant but out-of-the-way corner. Its rarely rotating exhibits, peppered with old pictures and artifacts from the city’s pioneer families, gave first-time patrons little reason to return.
Much has changed since then, as Mesa’s population has become more diverse, regional-minded and tech-driven. The new museum wants to be all of those things, too.
“Our goal is to be a new and different organization, vibrant and vital to the life of the community we serve,” officials said in a conceptual plan submitted to the city.
The bond-funded move to the federal building will push the museum into the heart of a budding arts-and-cultural district downtown, within walking distance of the light rail, galleries and other museums.
“The overall objective of this project is accessibility for the community,” museum director Lisa Anderson said. “That's the endgame.” . . . Regional accessibility also is important, Anderson said. 
 
A viable plan?
Citizens voiced support for a downtown heritage museum leading up to the 2012 parks-bond election and again at the polls that year.
Some elected officials, though, have worried the museum’s new model might not be viable.
History museums aren’t meant to be money-makers. But given Mesa's burgeoning downtown renaissance, and the limited number of properties Mesa owns in the city’s core** [see footnote by blogger below], much is riding on the museum meeting attendance projections.
“I think we're all confident in our design and our ability to revitalize a really important part of downtown.” Mesa Historical Museum Director Lisa Anderson

Councilman Dave Richins said if it were up to him, he’d “probably build a new museum from scratch” rather than try to retrofit the federal building, but he understood the heritage element was “an important component of what we're trying to do downtown.”

Councilmen David Luna and Kevin Thompson both said they wanted to see the museum seek additional partnership and fundraising opportunities throughout the construction process, so that it wouldn’t rely so heavily on limited city funding.

City and museum officials clarified that the city's commitment to the museum involves revamping the building and that the museum would be responsible for any administrative costs after the move.
Anderson also stressed that the museum already has been innovating and revising its offerings in recent years, with positive results. For instance, the two exhibits on display at the museum’s temporary home on Main Street — one examining the roots of the Cactus League, and another about Arizona's beloved "Wallace and Ladmo Show" — have performed well.
The spring-training exhibit in particular, which is being shown at multiple sites in the region, has drawn thousands of visitors from the Valley and elsewhere, Anderson said.
“It was decided eight years ago that it would be our home. It just took several years to get the funding mechanism in place,” she said. “I think we're all confident in our design and our ability to revitalize a really important part of downtown."

Timeline: Downtown Mesa's evolution

FYI: Meeting Minutes Historic Preservation Board from 06 December 2016

Historic Preservation Board Meeting Minutes 
December 6, 2016  6:00 p.m.
Location: Fire Station 201, 360 E. First Street

Members Present
Laura Schaffer-Metcalfe, Ed.D., Chair
Janice Gennevois, Vice-Chair 
Greg Marek
Milagros Zingoni 
Annalisa Alvrus, Ph.D. 
Louise Swann 
Brandon Benzing (arrived after approval of minutes) 

Staff Present 
John Wesley
Lauren Allsopp
Jeff McVay 

Guests:Vic Linoff, Others

 2. Approval of the November 1, 2016 regular meeting minutes 
Board member Swann noted the members absent from November meeting needed to be corrected to show her as being absent. 
First Motion made by Board member Marek to approve the minutes as amended and seconded by Vice-chair Gennevois to approve the November 1 meeting minutes.

Motion carried 6-0 (Board member Benzing absent) 
 

4. Downtown façade improvement, colonnade removal, and historic designation 
Staff member Jeff McVay provided the Board with an update on progress to implement a colonnade removal and façade improvement program in the downtown area. 

Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds in the amount $100,000 have been allocated for this year to begin the design work on façade improvements. 
The City will contract with several architects to provide these design services. 
Property owners will apply for the program and a committee, which includes both Staff member Wesley and Board member Zingoni, will help select the top applications for funding.  It is hoped the paperwork required for the grant will be completed so the funds are available by April. 
Mr. McVay stated that the Council has determined that implementation of this program is a transformative program for the downtown area and, based on this, the staff that administers the CDBG program is already tentatively setting aside funding in subsequent years to assist with the colonnade removal. 

This next year of funding should be available about the time the first round of façade improvement designs are completed. 
Board member Marek asked about how the process will maintain historic integrity in the designs to help move toward a historic district. 

Mr. McVay stated that the application for the program and the points associated with the selection will strongly favor those that will maintain the historic look of the buildings. 
The architects that will be used to help implement the program will be ones with a background in historic preservation. 
Also, because this program is using Federal funds, the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) will have to sign off on the program. 
The review committee will also be reviewing the designs before the go to the Design Review Board and staff will be monitoring the work of the architects along the way. 
Board member Marek asked for clarification on the role SHPO will have in the program.  Staff member Allsopp responded that because Federal funds are involved SHPO has to review the program to ensure the funds are not being used in a way that would harm historic properties. 

Mr. McVay stated it is his expectation they will just look at the high level of the overall program; they will not be involved in review of specific designs. 
Board members were excited about the progress on this program and thanked Mr. McVay for his work on this


5. Review November neighborhood meeting and discuss future opportunities for neighborhood meetings 
Chair Schaffer-Metcalfe stated she was pleased with the turnout at the meeting and the level of questions and discussion.  She wished they had stayed for the regular business meeting. 
Board member Zingoni stated one of the concerns brought up was with traffic issues and wondered if there is a way to tie historic district designation to opportunities to address traffic issues. 

Board member Gennevois agreed noting the issue her neighborhood has with Hibbert Street. 
Mr. Wesley stated this would likely be a bit of a challenge given all the factors that go into street design and traffic patterns, and the costs associated with making changes, but it could be looked at. 
Board member Marek suggest it was something Ms. Allsopp could help explore. 
The Board decided to try and hold the next neighborhood meeting in the Evergreen District at the February meeting.

   
6. Receive information, review and discuss the Post World War II neighborhoods study and options for continuation of this study 
Staff member Wesley provided an overview of the study that had been done in 2003/2004 to prepare the report on Post World War II developments and the work that had been done by staff and the Board to start to narrow the focus on developments that should be considered for historic designation. 

Board member Marek provided some additional background on how the process worked to narrow the focus on key neighborhoods.  The Board agreed they would like to re-engage in this effort and move forward with identifying some neighborhoods for consideration. 
Staff member Allsopp stated she had walked all the neighborhoods identified in Mr. Wesley’s memo as being the top developments for consideration in 2004. 

Based on her review she suggested that Duke Manor, Telford Place, and Easton be at the top of the list for consideration. 
The first step will be to see if there is any support in those neighborhoods for working on a designation. 

7. Updates on ongoing items: 
a. Certificates of Appropriateness cases 
Staff member Wesley provided an overview of the property at 463 N. Grand that has a number of issues with modifications that have been done without permits, including the building of a carport over the north property line. 

Right now this is an item for consideration by the Board of Adjustment, but because it is a contributing structure in a historic district, may become an item for Board consideration in the future.
 
b. Westside Clark local historic district designation progress 
Lauren Allsopp provided an update on the work she has done with the neighborhood leaders. 

They are about 9 property owners short of having enough signatures to file the application.  They are focusing on getting those signatures. 
They are also considering the best way to address the condominium project in the middle of the neighborhood – is that one signature, or do all of them count? 
Finally, the group is very frustrated with having to get the Prop 207 Waivers and wondered if there is some way to be grandfathered in as to not needing it since they started the process in 2004. 
Mr. Wesley explained that there is no grandfathering of this provision, but he is hopefully that the Council will be willing to consider and approve the designation without everyone signing the waivers.
 
c. Student writing contest 
Chair Shaffer-Metcalfe noted we received only 6 applications this year despite significant outreach. 

Board members are going to rank the entries individual and submit those to Mr. Wesley no later than December 16.  He will then average the rankings to determine the top three and get the announcement out to the winners as soon as possible.
 
d. Draft Historic Landmark Sign Ordinance 
Staff member Wesley stated Board member Marek had found that Casa Grande was making some changes to their ordinances to historic signs in their community. 

Mr. Wesley contacted the staff there and obtained a copy of what they are doing.  They are more specifically recognizing signs as historic landmarks and will then have some exemptions for designated signs in their sign code. 
In discussing this with the staff they have not yet specifically reviewed this with regards to the Reed decision, but will do so. 
Mr. Marek asked if we could get the City Attorney’s office to provide some type of clear definition or description of what constitutes sign content as a means of better understanding how to craft an ordinance.  Mr. Wesley stated he would inquire about this


e. Involvement of older students in historic preservation activity 
The working committee of Board members Benzing, Zingoni, and Alvrus are going to get together soon after the first of the year to start crafting a program that could be implemented next year.

 
8. Updates on Museums, Exhibits, Committees and Events related to Historic Preservation 
Vic Linoff addressed the Board stating that they are continuing to work on saving some of the historic signs along Main Street by finding people who will help with taking them down when the property is being redeveloped and then finding places to store them until a new location can be found. 

He also stated that he and Ron Peters have entered into a contract to write a book about the Buckhorn Baths
   





9. Board Member comments, questions, and future agenda items 
The Board agreed with Staff member Wesley suggestion to invite the new SHPO to come to a future Board meeting.

 
10. Adjournment
 Chair Schaffer-Metcalfe adjourned the meeting at 7:23 pm.  
First Motion made by Chair Schaffer-Metcalfe and seconded by Board member Alvrus. Motion carried 7-0     

Supporting data is available for public review in the Planning Division, Municipal Building, 55 N. Center St., Mesa, Arizona 85201 

Friday, January 06, 2017

Council Study Session - 1/5/2017 > Happy About A Clean Audit

Review of items goes fast... City officials unusually exuberant about getting "a clean audit" for a change, while Dennis Kavanagh, the longest-serving member on the Mesa City Council, chimes in how pleased he is that the clean audit happened after years of hiring-and-firing different independent accounting firms critical of certain practices for the CAFR, the city's required annual financial review
Mr. Brady asks to pull Item 4-g to take off agenda
Item 5-d request by Kevin Thompson for use of eminent domain, addressed by City Attorney Jim Smith about condemnation and acquisition of pieces of property. Role of title insurance companies explained. Kavanaugh and Luna speak and negotiations to acquire, reviewed by appraisers. Chris Brady brings up "3rd party determinations about price of land to be acquired [reasonable property value]
Giles brings up Item 5-f CAFR Annual Financial Report, with auditors called to explain the process and so-called "gap adjustments" between fiscal year and calendar year calendars. No material findings found by outside auditor - "a clean audit"

One-Night Count "To Better Understand" The Homeless in Mesa?? Point In Time


Volunteers needed for count of homeless in Mesa
01-05-2017 at 2:11:03 PM
The goal is to better understand how many individuals are experiencing homelessness in our community and be better equipped to meet their needs. The City of Mesa is looking for volunteers to participate in the Maricopa Association of Governments (MAG) 2017 Point-In-Time Homeless Count on Tuesday, Jan. 24 from 5 a.m. to noon.
How about DOING something to reduce the numbers of the homeless? [See above]
From 2015-2016 the number increased by 26%
These one-day counts are estimates only that fall way off the mark to get an accurate count.
It's been your MesaZona blogger's experience that the visible homeless on the streets are reluctant to get noticed, especially when there is a notice - or word gets around - that they are going to get counted.
The MAG 2017 Point-In-Time Homeless Count is a one-day street count to determine the number of people experiencing homelessness in Maricopa County during a given point in time. 
The count includes a brief survey to identify some of the characteristics of people experiencing homelessness in our community. Cities, such as Mesa, that receive federal funding for homeless assistance from  HUD are required to conduct an annual comprehensive count. This helps local governments and nonprofit organizations more effectively allocate resources necessary to meet the needs of the homeless population.
Volunteers, who must be 18 or older, will be deployed in groups of three or four to count and interview homeless individuals and their families in various parts of Mesa. The volunteers will be required to attend a volunteer training session prior to the count. The training session will be held Wednesday, Jan. 18 from 5:30 p.m. to 7 p.m. at Fire Station 201, 360 E. 1st St. An alternate training session will be held Monday, Jan. 23 in Phoenix at Bethany Bible Church, 6060 N. 7th Ave., from 5:30 p.m. to 7 p.m.
To register, visit www.mesaaz.gov/PITCount. The deadline for registration is Monday, Jan. 16 at 5:30 p.m.

Public Information and Communications
Contact: Kevin Christopher
Tel. 480-644-4699
kevin.christopher@mesaaz.gov

BLOGGER NOTES ON RELATED RESEARCH

Published 12.05.16
1. Homeless Increases Skew toward the West Coast/Pacific
A new NHIP Report using recently released HUD data on 2016 Point-in-Time sheltered and unsheltered homeless estimate show that 13 of the 15 Continuums with the largest increases in unsheltered homeless are all from West Coast/Hawaii states or those neighboring (Idaho or Arizona). The 15 areas include:
 
 
Published 12.20.16
Homelessness among Adults with Serious Mental Illness rises
In the latest 2016  estimates for one-day homelessness collected in January 2016, data show a rise of 3.6 percent in the estimated prevalence of homelessness among adults with serious mental illness (SMI).  The 2016 estimates from 402 Continuums across the country totaled 107,801 compared to 104,083 in 2015. Increases in sheltered and unsheltered homelessness among SMI persons were reported with a total of 61,846 in emergency or transitional shelters and 45,955 living in the streets, parks and other places not fit for human habitation.
The NHIP has compiled a state-by-state prevalence report from the individual subpopulation reports.

Never Miss a Ding Dong @ Home >> IvedaHome – Doorbell Camera

See who's at the door and talk to them whether you're home or away. They won't know the difference!
Press release
Iveda Launches IvedaHome Doorbell Camera Worldwide 
 
Cloud-based video surveillance for Home Sweet Home
 
 
MESA, AZ–(Marketwired – Jan 5, 2017) – Iveda® (OTCQB: IVDA), worldwide enabler of cloud-based video surveillance and data management through the licensing of its Sentir® platform, today announced the launch of its IvedaHome doorbell security camera. The doorbell camera is a standalone product that retails for about $149 in the U.S. It can also be bundled with Iveda’s IvedaHome automation and security system.
Iveda’s doorbell camera is a DIY (do-it-yourself) product that can easily be installed to replace the existing doorbell in most homes or offices. It serves as eyes and ears to what’s outside the front door using a smartphone or tablet.
“Seeing how well the product works from initial reseller installations overseas and how cool the features are, I installed one myself at my house and got everything up and running within half an hour,” said David Ly CEO of Iveda. “If you’re not a DIY person, it’s a low-voltage device that any handyman can set up for you.”
When someone rings the doorbell, all family members with the app on their devices will get an alert. ..
Iveda will sell the doorbell cameras through worldwide security integrators, telecoms and other distributors. 
“Before we focused on telecoms, we had a reseller program with security integrators in the U.S. I think a good way to re-engage is with a functional, cool new product that will excite their customers,” said Ly. “It’s a simple but effective product that does what it’s supposed to do: see who’s on the other side of the door before you open it and doubles as a remotely-accessible security camera.”
For more information call (480) 307-8700 or visit www.iveda.com.
To follow Iveda visit www.facebook.com/ivedasolutions, www.twitter.com/ivedasolutions or www.linkedin.com/company/iveda-solutions.

Thursday, January 05, 2017

Fund-Raising Event 2-5 PM on 28 Jan 2017 for Bruce Nelson New Vet Documentary

Details please see graphic

Falcon Field Community/Airport Tenants Meeting 18 Jan 2017

Falcon Field Airport Community/Tenant Check-In Meeting
Post Date: 01/04/2017 7:00 PM
Mesa residents are cordially invited to attend the upcoming Community/Airport Tenants Check-In Meeting to be held at 6:30 p.m. Wednesday, January 18, 2017 in the Falcon Field Airport terminal building, 4800 E. Falcon Drive.
Refreshments will be served.
Please see the meeting agenda below.
For more information
call 480-644-2450 or email airport.info@mesaaz.gov

Falcon Field Airport
Community/Airport Tenants Check-in Meeting 

Agenda
6:30 p.m.
Wednesday, January 18, 2017 Falcon Field Airport Terminal Building
4800 East Falcon Drive
Mesa, AZ  85215

I. Call to Order

II. Introductions

III. Airport Capital Improvement Projects

IV. FY 2017-18 Fees and Charges

V. Airport Master Plan Update

VI. Falcon Tech Center

VII. ‘Fly Friendly’ Program

VIII. Other Items

IX. Community/Airport Tenants Comments/Questions/Ideas

X. Upcoming Events

XI. Adjourn

Light refreshments will be served.

Zelensky Calls for a European Army as He Slams EU Leaders’ Response

      Jan 23, 2026 During the EU Summit yesterday, the EU leaders ...