You can see clusters of colors (income levels) throughout the city limits across all the six districts whose residents are represented for election purposes to the Mesa City Council.
Note the two areas in northeast Mesa with scattered clusters and concentrations of red that show higher-income levels.
Then note the larger distribution of dark-blue clusters that show clusters and concentrations of lower-income levels.
The shades-in-between on the entire income spectrum represent what's generally referred to as "the middle-class".
_________________________________________________________________________
In 2010 the district boundaries were redrawn from the original three districts to the six you see now. For what reasons were stated or not, those are the two richest areas.
Whether or not each and every district has received a fair and equitable share of the millions of investments financed by all taxpayers might be a good project for someone or group of interested people to look into . . .
____________________________________________________________________
Visualizing America’s Middle Class Squeeze
April 12, 2017
_________________________________________________________________________________
Notes from the author Max Galka:
- Household income data comes from: LTDB at Brown University and IPUMS National Historical Geographic Information System.
- For some of the cities, I used the urban agglomeration boundaries (as defined by the US Census), rather than the boundaries of the city proper. In these cases, the cities’ administrative boundaries included large areas of non-urban land, some of which may not have had tract-level data available as far back as 1970.
- Built with Blueshift.
Explore the map below to see how the distribution of incomes in American cities has changed since 1970.
Select one of the eight cities shown and toggle between years.
The color and height of each region correspond to that area’s median household income, adjusted for inflation.
(Blogger Note: For the purposes of this post, the first map Income Polarization in U.S. Cities from this referenced site http://metrocosm.com/income-us-cities-1970-2015/ has been omitted since it takes up a lot of memory space. You can access the entire full screen version of that map by going to the underlined link included if you want.)
> Each city is divided up by its Census tracts, small territorial units of roughly-equal population (about 4,000 people each).
> The color and height of each Census tract correspond to the inflation-adjusted median household income of its residents.
America’s “squashed” income distribution
Since 1970, the US economy has grown significantly larger.
Real US GDP per capita, a measure of the country’s average income, has more than doubled.
However, the median household income, a measure of what the typical American family earns, has not kept up. Across the US, median household income has increased by only about 20% over the same period.
Such a large disparity between the average and median incomes is possible because the economic gains have not been shared evenly.
> They have been realized predominantly by high-income households, with only a small share going to the lower majority of the income spectrum.
> And this uneven split has grown increasingly imbalanced over time, as shown in the following chart from The Upshot.
In the most recent period examined, between 2009 and 2012, a full 95% of the country’s economic gains were claimed by the top 1 percent of households.
Real US GDP per capita, a measure of the country’s average income, has more than doubled.
However, the median household income, a measure of what the typical American family earns, has not kept up. Across the US, median household income has increased by only about 20% over the same period.
Such a large disparity between the average and median incomes is possible because the economic gains have not been shared evenly.
> They have been realized predominantly by high-income households, with only a small share going to the lower majority of the income spectrum.
> And this uneven split has grown increasingly imbalanced over time, as shown in the following chart from The Upshot.
In the most recent period examined, between 2009 and 2012, a full 95% of the country’s economic gains were claimed by the top 1 percent of households.
The result is an income distribution that looks like it’s been “squashed,” as illustrated brilliantly in this animated chart by the FT.
The flattening income distributions of US cities
This trend is not only happening at the nationwide level. Income distributions within individual cities are also being flattened.
Since 1970, some cities, such as San Francisco, have fared well economically. Others, such as Detroit, have struggled. But nearly without exception, American cities have seen a sharp rise in inequality — a widening gap between those at the top of the income spectrum and those at the bottom.Like the map above. this graphic shows the distribution of median household income across each city’s Census tracts. It includes the eight cities from the map as well as 12 additional major US cities.
In 1970, each of these cities shows a near-symmetrical, bell-shaped income distribution —
a high concentration of people in the middle, with a narrow tail of low and high-income households on either end.
As of 2015, the distribution of each city has been compressed.
The concentration of middle-income households in the center has been squashed down and pushed out to one or both extremes — fewer middle-income households, more households in the low-income and/or high-income strata.
_________________________________________________________________________________
Is America’s middle class being “crushed”?
Contrary to the prevailing view that America’s middle class is in terrible shape, the typical US household today is earning about 20% more than in 1970, after adjusting for inflation. That’s small relative to the growth of the economy and even smaller compared to the income growth seen at the top of the spectrum. But it means the middle class is no worse off today income-wise than in 1970. So, to say the middle class is being “crushed” may be a stretch. On the other hand, there are real societal costs when wealth is distributed in a way that is perceived as unfair.
These contrasting views are explained well in the posts below, both from people greatly respect by the author of this report from Metrocosm
- Controversial essay by Paul Graham, founder of the startup accelerator Y Combinator, essentially arguing that as long as a society has economic mobility, inequality is a good thing. It’s drives of innovation and fuels the country’s economic engine.
- Article by Nobel laureate Joseph Stiglitz, someone I had the pleasure of meeting a few years ago, discussing inequality not as merely an economic problem, but one that comes down to fairness and social cohesion.
Max Galka
I'm an NYC-based entrepreneur (my newest project: Blueshift) and adjunct instructor at UPenn. I'm fascinated by data visualization and the ways that data is transforming our understanding of the world. I spend a lot of time with my face buried in Excel, and when I find something interesting I write about it here and also as a Guardian Cities and Huffington Post contributor.
More about my background
More about my background
__________________________________________________________
